Reader v. State, 586 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Reader v. State, 586 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Reader v. State (fla, 1992-04-02)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Reader v. State
Fla. · 1992 · confidence medium
We have for review Reader v. State, 586 So.2d 71, 72 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), in which the Fifth District Court of Appeal certified the following question of great public importance: DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Glenn READER
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 91-46.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jul 23, 1991.
586 So. 2d 71
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kenneth Witts, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nancy Ryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
Cobb, Griffin, Harris.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COBB, HARRIS and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Rehearing

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING/CERTIFICATION

HARRIS, Judge.

We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing solely for the purpose of certifying the following question to be of great public importance:

DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONTRAINT?

COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.