Fields v. State, 666 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Fields v. State, 666 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Jeffrey a Helms v. State of Florida, 271 So. 3d 1030 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 554 [I]f there was any error in the admission of this evidence, that error was harmless in light of the solid eyewitness identification of the defendant.1 citing case1 citing court put it this way
  • Jeffrey a Helms v. State of Florida, 271 So. 3d 1030 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019).published
    ([I]f there was any error in the admission of this evidence, that error was harmless in light of the solid eyewitness identification of the defendant.)
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rod FIELDS
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 95-485.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 15, 1995.
Published opinion
666 So. 2d 554
1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11987
1995 WL 676060
De la 0, Marko & Wang and Miguel M. de la 0, Miami, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Wanda Raiford, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Baskin, Cope, Goderich.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 82%
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (1)
PER CURIAM.

After a careful review of the record, we find that the trial court did not abuse its broad discretion regarding the admissibility of evidence. Jent v. State, 408 So.2d 1024, 1029 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1111, 102 S.Ct. 2916, 73 L.Ed.2d 1322 (1982). Additionally, if there was any error in the admission of this evidence, that error was harmless in light of the solid eyewitness identification of the defendant. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.