Hammad v. Hammad, 146 So. 3d 532 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014). · Go Syfert
Search
Hammad v. Hammad, 146 So. 3d 532 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Amal Crane v. Matthew Harrison Crane, No. 3D2024-2262 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 14, 2026)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 533 reversing and remanding the award of attorney’s fees where the trial court failed to make the required findings in the final judgment regarding one spouse’s financial need and the other spouse’s ability to pay1 citing case1 citing court put it this way
  • Amal Crane v. Matthew Harrison Crane, No. 3D2024-2262 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 14, 2026).published
    (reversing and remanding the award of attorney’s fees where the trial court failed to make the required findings in the final judgment regarding one spouse’s financial need and the other spouse’s ability to pay)
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ihab J. HAMMAD
v.
Thamina J. HAMMAD
No. 5D14-577.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sep 12, 2014.
Published opinion
146 So. 3d 532
2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14200
2014 WL 4471635
Bradley S. Sherman, Orange City, for Appellant., Ivan K. Clements, Jr., of Ivan K. Clements, Jr., P.A., DeLand, for Appellee.
Cohen, Evander, Lambert.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Ihab Hammad (Former Husband) appeals a final judgment that dissolved his marriage to Thamina Hammad (Former Wife). On appeal, he argues that the trial court abused its discretion by awarding Former Wife durational alimony and ordering Former Husband to pay seventy-five percent of Former Wife’s attorney’s[*533] fees -without making the requisite findings of fact. Regarding the alimony award, Former Wife concedes error because the final judgment lacks the factual findings required under section 61.08(2), Florida Statutes (2013). See Roth v. Cortina, 59 So.3d 163, 165-66 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). Likewise, Former Wife concedes error as to the award of attorney’s fees, again acknowledging that the final judgment is devoid of factual findings regarding Former Wife’s financial need and Former Husband’s ability to pay. See Allen v. Allen, 114 So.3d 1102, 1104 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

EVANDER, COHEN and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.