Syfert Injury Law Firm

DIVESTON MERLIEN v. JM FAMILY ENTERPRISES, INC., SHERIDIAN 441, LLC and BENDLES RENTALS, LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2020-07-22T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Statutes—the court found that it also violated N.J.S.A. 34:15-39 (Section 39)—a statutory provision without a Florida…declared to be against public policy.” N.J.S.A. 34:15-39. 8 damages

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2015-03-26T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Minor Child(ren) (03/15) - 39 - Administration. SELF-REPRESENTED

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2014-12-17T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: Affidavit (Long Form) (01/15) - 39 - Retirement

CHACKAL v. Staples

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2008-10-22T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 991 So. 2d 949

Snippet: waterway); and planted sod on the approximately 15'; by 34' of land lying to the west of the guardrail

Paoli v. NATHERSON & CO., PA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1999-07-09T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 750 So. 2d 46

Snippet: judgment that awards Natherson & Co. $90,015.39 for breach of an employment agreement, together

Department of Highway Safety v. Schluter

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1997-12-30T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 705 So. 2d 81

Snippet: On their face, they comply with section 120.52(15)';s definition of a rule as agency statements of …not be considered to comply with section 120.52(15)';s definition of rule. In espousing this position…, which otherwise complies with section 120.52(15)';s definition of rule, cannot be considered a rule

State v. Manfredonia

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1995-02-08T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 649 So. 2d 1388

Snippet: decision as to Slayton. Alves held that section 856.015';s "requirement that one control the behavior

Bernard v. Town Council of Palm Beach

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1990-11-06T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 569 So. 2d 853

Snippet: being 5' from East property line instead of 15'; setback as now required by zoning ordinance in

Young v. TORTOISE ISLAND HOMEOWNER'S

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1987-07-23T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 511 So. 2d 381

Snippet: other homes. You may also want to reconsider the 15'; width of your driveway... . He concluded that

Seaboard Coastline R. Co. v. Addison

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-11-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 481 So. 2d 3

Snippet: Section 316.1575 obligates a driver to stop within 15'; of railroad tracks when a train blows its whistle

Nash v. Fort Lauderdale Bd. of Adjustment

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-01-08T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 462 So. 2d 88

Snippet: yard, which shall not be less than fifteen feet (15';), and where the lot abuts upon a waterway, the

BMZ CORP. v. City of Oakland Park

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-05-05T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 415 So. 2d 735

Snippet: the ordinance. [4] 5 Municipal Corporations § 15-39 (McQuillin ed. 1981). [5] Black's Law Dictionary

Biltmore Systems, Inc. v. Mai Kai, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-05-05T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 413 So. 2d 458

Snippet: This distinction is further evidenced by paragraph 15';s heading which reads: "Additional Vehicles

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1980-04-23T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: county (see ss. 142.11, 142.12, 939.08, and 939.15).'; (Emphasis supplied.) But see AGO 076-183'

Hemisphere Equity Realty Co. v. KEY BISCAYNE, ETC.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1979-04-16T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 369 So. 2d 996

Snippet: from the side street (S) property line, setback 15'; from the side (N) property and setback 25'

Bd. of Cty. Com'rs of Metro. Dade Cty. v. Lowas

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1977-06-14T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 348 So. 2d 13

Snippet: fence (8' permitted) to setback 7 1/2' (15'; required) from side (W) property line. "The

Lawyers Title Guaranty Fund v. Milgo Electronics

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1975-07-22T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 318 So. 2d 416

Snippet: the closing of *418 the transaction disclosed a 15'; easement outside of tract 17 to the east [see … The Executive Center, Inc. from the use of the 15'; strip in question. Executive answered, contending…Executive, that court in effect determining that the 15'; was not within tract 17.[3] Thereafter, Milgo …its purchase of tract 17] demonstrated that the 15'; was outside of tract 17. Schedule B, § 6 of the

General Development Corporation v. Kirk

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1971-07-14T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 251 So. 2d 284

Snippet: parcel commencing at a point which bears South 4° 15'; East from the center of the foot of a cattle dock…24 1913 Begin at a point which bears South 4° 15'; E. 257. ft. from center of foot

Charnofree Corporation v. City of Miami Beach

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1954-12-13T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 76 So. 2d 665

Snippet: permitted in `Use District RE' and `Area District 15'; under said zoning ordinance No. 289. "D. … under `Use District RE' and `Area District 15'; in and by said zoning ordinance." (Underscoring

Wheeler v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1954-02-11T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 72 So. 2d 364

Snippet: letter like that? A. I did. "Q. On January 15, ';52, three days after you were arrested on Crystal