The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 76
ATTACHMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 76.08

76.08 Procurement of attachment; generally.—Upon motion by plaintiff, a writ of attachment may issue when the grounds relied on for the issuance of the writ clearly appear from specific facts shown by a verified complaint or a separate affidavit of the plaintiff, and all applicable requirements of s. 76.09, s. 76.10, or s. 76.11 are met.

History.—RS 1641; GS 2105; RGS 3406; CGL 5259; s. 26, ch. 67-254; s. 2, ch. 78-38.

F.S. 76.08 on Google Scholar

F.S. 76.08 on Casetext

Amendments to 76.08

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 76.08

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 76.08.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

R- BOC REPRESENTATIVES, INC. v. T. MINEMYER, T. v. R- BOC, 233 F. Supp. 3d 647 (N.D. Ill. 2017)

. . . couplers were: 73.96 & 75.97; 74.76 & 75.52; 78.59 & 79.11; 76.19 & 77.45; 75.64 & 75.15; 75.82 & 76.10; 76.08 . . .

IN RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 191 So. 3d 411 (Fla. 2016)

. . . Forcible felonies-are-Ust-edr4n-§-7-76.08, Fla. ■ Stat- Aggressor ■§ -776,0MyFla. . . .

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CHULY INTERNATIONAL, LLC,, 118 So. 3d 325 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . § 76.08, Fla. Stat. (2018). . . .

BADEN- WINTERWOOD, v. LIFE TIME FITNESS INC., 729 F. Supp. 2d 965 (S.D. Ohio 2010)

. . . hours = $38.04 x 5 weeks = $190.20 The remaining h overtime hours: $12.68 x 1.5 = $19.02 x 4 hours = $76.08 . . .

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE, v. PERIODICALS PUBLICACOES TECNICAS,, 581 F. Supp. 2d 1248 (S.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . Plaintiffs obtained the writ pursuant to Section 76.08 of the Florida Statutes. . . . Stat. 76.08. . . .

J. PAGAN, v. FRUCHEY, 492 F.3d 766 (6th Cir. 2007)

. . . § 452.09 (1969) Wapakoneta, § 452.08 Warren, § 351.06 Warrensville Heights, § 351.12 Waynesville, § 76.08 . . .

D. CARTON, III, C. D. Jr. v. CHOICE POINT, 450 F. Supp. 2d 489 (D.N.J. 2006)

. . . time the stock was converted by Choice Point, its value was $49.60 per share; it reached a high of $76.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SCARBOROUGH,, 203 F. App'x 184 (10th Cir. 2006)

. . . September 5, 2003, during an undercover sting in Wagoner, Oklahoma, law enforcement officers recovered 76.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ABRAMS,, 494 F. Supp. 2d 657 (S.D. Ohio 2005)

. . . official procedure authorizing police officers employed by Dayton to have vehicles towed is set forth in § 76.08 . . . Defendant argues that § 76.08(C) did not authorize Hooper and Elworth to tow his vehicle, since Steeleman . . . dispute Defendant’s factual predicate, it cannot agree that the failure to arrest Steeleman means that § 76.08 . . . Therefore, the Court concludes that § 76.08(C) authorized Hooper and Elworth to have the Chevrolet Caprice . . .

D. FRASHER, v. FOX DISTRIBUTING OF S. W. FLORIDA, INC., 813 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 76.08, Florida Statutes (2000), allows the trial court to issue a prejudgment writ of attachment . . .

FOX RIVER VALLEY RAILROAD CORPORATION v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF STATE OF WISCONSIN D. W., 863 F. Supp. 893 (E.D. Wis. 1994)

. . . . § 76.08. This argument is without merit. . . .

HORDIS BROTHERS, INC. v. SENTINEL HOLDINGS, INC., 562 So. 2d 715 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . .” § 76.08, Fla.Stat. (1989) (emphasis added); see ch. 78-38, Laws of Fla.; North Georgia Finishing, . . . Section 76.08, Florida Statutes (1989), provides that an attachment is procured upon motion by plaintiff . . .

M. SIMPSON, v. S. SIMPSON,, 524 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . .-05, Fla.Stat.), verification of specific facts (§ 76.08, Fla.Stat.), and bond (§ 76.12, Fla. . . .

BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD CO. Co. Co. Co. B. St. Co. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF STATE OF WISCONSIN,, 570 F. Supp. 585 (W.D. Wis. 1983)

. . . . § 76.08. . . .

v., 34 T.C. 664 (T.C. 1960)

. . . The import division of Schoonmaker supplied an average of 76.08 per cent of the raw mica needs of petitioner . . .