Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 81 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 81 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 81

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 81
PROHIBITION
View Entire Chapter
CHAPTER 81
CHAPTER 81
PROHIBITION
81.011 Petition for prohibition.
81.021 Prohibition; supersedeas.
81.031 Prohibition; procedure.
81.011 Petition for prohibition.The petitioner shall file a petition stating the nature of the action, the proceedings in the inferior court, tribunal or body presuming to exercise jurisdiction sought to be prohibited, and demand that writ of prohibition be granted in that behalf. When the matters appear on the face of the proceedings in the body presuming to exercise jurisdiction, the certified transcript of the record of all the proceedings shall accompany the petition. When the matters are not matters of record, they shall be verified by affidavit of petitioner or petitioner’s agent, or attorney.
History.s. 1, ch. 1873, 1872; s. 2, ch. 3002, 1877; RS 1785; GS 2262; RGS 3585; CGL 5450; s. 32, ch. 67-254; s. 422, ch. 95-147.
Note.Former s. 80.06.
81.021 Prohibition; supersedeas.If in its judgment a prima facie case is made, the court shall issue an order directed to the body presuming to exercise jurisdiction and to plaintiff to show cause why the writ of prohibition should not issue. The order is a supersedeas and shall be served on the body presuming to exercise jurisdiction and the parties at such time as the court directs and those served shall defend within the time set in the writ. In case of failure to make an answer, it may be enforced by contempt.
History.s. 2, ch. 1873, 1872; s. 3, ch. 3002, 1877; RS 1786; GS 2263; RGS 3586; CGL 5451; s. 32, ch. 67-254; s. 29, ch. 73-333.
Note.Former s. 80.07.
81.031 Prohibition; procedure.In the circuit court the petition shall be accompanied by a supporting brief in the same manner as required for mandamus in that court.
History.s. 32, ch. 67-254.

F.S. 81 on Google Scholar

F.S. 81 on Casetext

Amendments to 81


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 81
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S601.81 - HEALTH-SAFETY - REPEALED 87-44 - M: F



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 81

Total Results: 20

Ortiz v. Winn-Dixie, Inc., Travelers Insurance, and Sedgwick CMS

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-23

Snippet: McNeilly v. Farm Stores, Inc., 553 So. 2d 1279, 1280–81 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) (noting that “so long as a doctor

Rogers, Rogers v. Gregor, Skipper

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-23

Snippet: Inc. v. Brown (Genesis I), 186 So. 3d 1074, 1080-81 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (“The notice provisions in section

Ricardo Ferreira v. MTGLQ Investors, L.P.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-18

Snippet: reversal.”); Zarate v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr. Co., 81 So. 3d 556, 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“Where there

Williams v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-18

Snippet: so. See Giambrone v. State, 109 So. 3d 1279, 1280–81 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). Even so, it is clear from the

Diane Scott v. Erica Stewart

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-18

Snippet: 1993))); Zarate v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr. Co. as Tr., 81 So. 3d 556, 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“Where there

Keystone Towers Condominium Association Inc. v. Hamid R. Rahimi

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-04

Snippet: (quoting Zarate v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr. Co., 81 So. 3d 556, 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)) (internal brackets

J.B. Harris, P.A. v. Virage Capital Management LP

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-27

Snippet: corporation. State Bd. of Accountancy v. Eber, 149 So. 2d 81, 82 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963). That changed in 1961 when

Gould v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-27

Snippet: DCA 2022) (quoting M.P. v. State, 682 So. 2d 79, 81 (Fla. 1996)). The Legislature has outlined three

April Thomason v. the State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-20

Snippet: postconviction attack under Strickland.” Mendoza v. State, 81 So. 3d 579, 581 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (emphasis added)

Donahue v. Donahue

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-15

Snippet: ' " (quoting Scott v. Scott, 888 So. 2d 81, 83 (Fla. 1st DCA

Eduardo Acosta v. the State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-06

Snippet: videotape.”) with Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 380–81 (2007) (“Respondent’s version of events is so utterly

Barbara Altomare v. Boca West Country Club, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-23

Snippet: White v. Marine Transp. Lines, Inc., 372 So. 2d 81, 84 (Fla. 1979); see also Bogdanoff v. Broken Sound

BAM Trading Services, Inc., D/B/A Binance.US v. State of Florida, Office of Financial Regulation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-17

Snippet: Dept. of Financial Servs. v. Fugett, 946 So. 2d 80, 81 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)). Respectfully, this is an incorrect

Homeowners Choice Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Deborah Albury

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-16

Snippet: arriving at a conclusion.”); cf. Evors v. Bryan, 81 So. 513, 513 (Fla. 1919) (“It is well settled that

Florida Department of Health v. Kenneth Woliner, M.D.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-02

Snippet: in declaratory judgment proceedings, section 86.081, Florida Statutes (2005), provides that ‘[t]he court

Kim Braddock v. City of Port Orange Pension Fund

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-02

Snippet: duties, or position of his employment. See id. at 1280–81. I agree with the majority’s determination that the

Curtis Leroy Sherrod, II v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-02

Snippet: (post-indictment interrogation); Iowa v. Tovar, 541 U.S. 77, 81 (2004) (plea hearing); Gardner v. Florida, 430 U

Rachael Morelli v. Sean J. Bordelon

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-27

Snippet: Court] for decision.” Lynn v. City of Ft. Lauderdale, 81 So. 2d 511, 513 (Fla. 1955). Instead, “the duty rests

OptumRX, as Successor by Merger to Catamaran Corporation, and Optumrx in Its Own Right v. Bay Pharmacy Inc., Bay Pharmacy Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-27

Snippet: instance of either party.” Damora, 324 So. 2d at 81–82. It is important to note that Damora interpreted

Jean-Philippe Schneider v. Christian Tirikian

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-25

Snippet: still be prevented.” Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, 81 (1972). “The notice must be of such nature as reasonably