Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 88.0011 (2025)

Short title.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

88.0011 Short title.—This act shall be known and may be cited as the “Uniform Interstate Family Support Act.”

History.—s. 1, ch. 96-189.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1999–2012 · leading case: Trissler v. Trissler, 987 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Trissler v. Trissler, 987 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008). “§ 1738B; §§ 88.0011-.9051, Fla. Stat. (2007). Both the FFCCSOA and the UIFSA grant "continuing, exclusive jurisdiction" concerning a child support order to the state issuing the order.”

Dep't of Revenue Ex Rel. Sloan v. Sloan, 743 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). · cites it 2× “See § 88.0011, Fla. Stat. (1997). See Department of Revenue v.”

Dep't of Revenue v. Cascella, 751 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). “§ 88.0011, et seq. It applies to all proceedings for support or for modification of support orders, or proceedings for determination of parentage, commenced on or after that date.”

Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Meire v. Bander, 734 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). · cites it 2× “At oral argument, Bander's counsel conceded this issue after he was advised that the petition met the requirements of section 88.0011, Florida Statutes (1997), the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act formerly known as URESA.”

Dep't of Revenue v. Ortiz, 84 So. 3d 1206 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). “§§ 88.0011-88.9051, Fla. Stat. (2010). . The parties submitted statements pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.”

Hedge v. Hedge, 816 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). · cites it 2× “See § 88.0011, Fla. Stat. (1997). The Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA) was its statutory predecessor.”

In re Marriage of Hartman (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “See F.S.A. §§88.0011 to 88.9031 (1998). Although the IDPA may initiate a foreign proceeding under the provisions of the Uniform Act, Illinois courts do not necessarily lose jurisdiction over child support matters that were originally adjudicated here.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.