Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 104.22 (2025)
Stealing and destroying records, etc., of election.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
104.22 Stealing and destroying records, etc., of election.—Any person who is guilty of stealing, willfully and wrongfully breaking, destroying, mutilating, defacing, or unlawfully moving or securing and detaining the whole or any part of any ballot box or any record tally sheet or copy thereof, returns, or any other paper or document provided for, or who fraudulently makes any entry or alteration therein except as provided by law, or who permits any other person so to do, is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 104.22
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§104.22LARCSTEAL MOVE SECURE DETAIN BALLOT BOX REC ETC
§104.22FRAUDPERMIT ENTRY OR ALTER BALLOT BOX RECORDS
§104.22DAMAGE PROP-PUBLICDESTROY MUTILATE DEFACE BALLOT BOX RECORDS ETC
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1974–1988 · leading case: News-Press Publ'g Co. v. Firestone, 527 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).
News-Press Publ'g Co. v. Firestone, 527 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). “20 (prohibiting any elector allowing his ballot to be seen or endeavoring to get an elector to show how he voted and other offenses); § 104.22 (providing penalties for stealing and destroying election records); § 104.”
State v. Brown, 298 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). “However, the charge contained in Count II may constitute a violation of § 104.22, F.S., which proscribes certain conduct relative to election materials and records.”
News-Press Pub. Co., Inc. v. Firestone, 527 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). “20 (prohibiting any elector allowing his ballot to be seen or endeavoring to get an elector to show how he voted and other offenses); § 104.22 (providing penalties for stealing and destroying election records); § 104.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.