Florida Statute 298.005 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXI
DRAINAGE

Chapter 298
DRAINAGE AND WATER CONTROL

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 298.005

298.005 Definitions.—As used in this chapter, the term:

(1) “Jurisdictional water management district” means the chapter 373 water management district or districts within which the lands encompassed by a water control district are located.

(2) “Owner” means the owner of the freehold estate, subject to assessment pursuant to this chapter, as appears by the deed record. The term does not include reversioners, remaindermen, or mortgagees, who are not to be counted and need not be notified by publication or served by process, but are to be represented by the present owners of the freehold estate in any proceeding under this chapter.

(3) “Water control plan” means the comprehensive operational document that describes the activities and improvements to be conducted by a water control district authorized under this chapter and includes any district “plan of reclamation,” “water management plan,” or “plan of improvement” that details the system of water management improvements implemented by a water control district.

History.—s. 38, ch. 6458, 1913; RGS 1135; CGL 1490; s. 1, ch. 97-40; s. 1, ch. 98-329; s. 4, ch. 2000-308.

Note.—Former s. 298.68.

F.S. 298.005 on Google Scholar

F.S. 298.005 on Casetext

Amendments to 298.005

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 298.005

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 298.005.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 298.005

Total Results: 18

Shands Jacksonville Medical Center, Inc., and University of Florida Board of Trustees

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-11

Snippet: erroneous exercise of jurisdiction. 348 So. 2d at 298. 5 This 5 Cf. Art. V, § 5(b), Fla. Const. (“The

Shands Jacksonville Medical Center, Inc., and University of Florida Board of Trustees

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-11

Snippet: erroneous exercise of jurisdiction. 348 So. 2d at 298. 5 This 5 Cf. Art. V, § 5(b), Fla. Const. (“The

The Florida Bar v. Jonathan Stephen Schwartz & The Florida Bar v. Jonathan Stephen Schwartz

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-01-18

Snippet: See Schwartz II, 334 So. 3d 298. -5- party sought review of the referee’s

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2011-02-25

Snippet: Fla. 02-30 (2002) and 04-48 (2004). 9 Section 298.005(3), Fla. Stat. And see Roach v. LoxahatcheeGroves

Estate of Jones v. MARINER HEALTH CARE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-03-16

Citation: 955 So. 2d 43, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3857, 2007 WL 776524

Snippet: or for negligence." Id. Blankfeld, 902 So.2d at 298. [5] Not only are the jury instructions different

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2000-05-24

Snippet: supervisors of water control districts. 6 Section 298.005(2), Fla. Stat. 7 Section 298.11(3), Fla. Stat.

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1999-06-02

Snippet: shall have been elected and qualified."6 Section 298.005(2), Florida Statutes, defines "Owner" as "the owner

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1990-08-07

Snippet: Butterworth Attorney General RAB/tjw 1 See, s. 298.005, F.S., defining "owner." 2 See, s. 298.11(1), F

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1983-04-06

Snippet: formation of water control districts. See, ss 298.01-298.05, F.S. (1979), repealed by Ch. 80-281, Laws of Florida

Hasam Realty Corp. v. City of Hallandale

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-01-07

Citation: 393 So. 2d 561, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18654

Snippet: is shown. State ex rel. Moody v. Barnes, 25 Fla. 298, 5 So. 722 (Fla. 1889). The term “abuse of discretion”

Tappy v. State ex rel. Ervin

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1955-07-08

Citation: 82 So. 2d 161, 1955 Fla. LEXIS 3888

Snippet: So. 506; State ex rel. Moody v. Barnes, 25 Fla. 298, 5 So. 722. See also Opinion of the Justices, 14 Fla

Nelson v. Lindsey

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1942-10-23

Citation: 10 So. 2d 131, 151 Fla. 596, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1226

Snippet: v. State, 3 Fla. 202; State v. Barnes, 25 Fla. 298,5 So. 722, or to require an illegal act to be done

Peninsula Land Company v. Howard

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1942-04-10

Citation: 6 So. 2d 389, 149 Fla. 786, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 873

Snippet: v. Gamble, 16 Fla. 687; State v. Barns,25 Fla. 298, 5 So. 722; City of Tampa v. Kaunitz, 39 Fla. 683

State Ex Rel. Allen v. Rose

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1936-03-30

Citation: 167 So. 21, 123 Fla. 544, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1010

Snippet: 61 Fla. 233, 34 So. 370; State v. Barnes,25 Fla. 298, 5 So. 722. In the case of State, ex rel. Pinellas

State Ex Rel. Simmons v. Lee

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1935-04-03

Citation: 160 So. 886, 119 Fla. 745

Snippet: ex rel. Moody v. Barnes, Comptroller, 25 Fla. 298,5 So.2d 722, the judgment and discretion of the Comptroller

Attorney General Ex Rel. Taylor v. Crawford

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1928-03-09

Citation: 116 So. 41, 95 Fla. 438

Snippet: Rep. 698; State ex rel. Moody v. Barnes, 25 Fla. 298, 5 So.2d Rep. 722; State ex rel. Kennerly v. Amos

City of Pensacola v. Bear

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1922-04-06

Citation: 83 Fla. 484, 91 So. 360

Snippet: Fla. 202; State ex rel. Moody v. Barnes, 25 Fla. 298, 5 South. *494Rep. 722; State ex rel. Kennerly v.

State ex rel. Bonsteel v. Allen

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1922-02-10

Citation: 83 Fla. 214, 91 So. 104

Snippet: Fla. 610; State ex rel. Moody v. Barnes 25 Fla. 298, 5 South. Rep. 722; Pensacola & A. R. Co. v. State