|
|
The 2025 Florida Statutes
|
|
|
|
|
F.S. 458.331458.331 Grounds for disciplinary action; action by the board and department.—(1) The following acts constitute grounds for denial of a license or disciplinary action, as specified in s. 456.072(2):(a) Attempting to obtain, obtaining, or renewing a license to practice medicine by bribery, by fraudulent misrepresentations, or through an error of the department or the board. (b) Having a license or the authority to practice medicine revoked, suspended, or otherwise acted against, including the denial of licensure, by the licensing authority of any jurisdiction, including its agencies or subdivisions. The licensing authority’s acceptance of a physician’s relinquishment of a license, stipulation, consent order, or other settlement, offered in response to or in anticipation of the filing of administrative charges against the physician’s license, shall be construed as action against the physician’s license. (c) Being convicted or found guilty of, or entering a plea of nolo contendere to, regardless of adjudication, a crime in any jurisdiction which directly relates to the practice of medicine or to the ability to practice medicine. (d) False, deceptive, or misleading advertising. (e) Failing to report to the department any person who the licensee knows is in violation of this chapter or of the rules of the department or the board. However, a person who the licensee knows is unable to practice medicine with reasonable skill and safety to patients by reason of illness or use of alcohol, drugs, narcotics, chemicals, or any other type of material, or as a result of a mental or physical condition, may be reported to a consultant operating an impaired practitioner program as described in s. 456.076 rather than to the department. (f) Aiding, assisting, procuring, or advising any unlicensed person to practice medicine contrary to this chapter or to a rule of the department or the board. (g) Failing to perform any statutory or legal obligation placed upon a licensed physician. (h) Making or filing a report which the licensee knows to be false, intentionally or negligently failing to file a report or record required by state or federal law, willfully impeding or obstructing such filing or inducing another person to do so. Such reports or records shall include only those which are signed in the capacity as a licensed physician. (i) Paying or receiving any commission, bonus, kickback, or rebate, or engaging in any split-fee arrangement in any form whatsoever with a physician, organization, agency, or person, either directly or indirectly, for patients referred to providers of health care goods and services, including, but not limited to, hospitals, nursing homes, clinical laboratories, ambulatory surgical centers, or pharmacies. The provisions of this paragraph shall not be construed to prevent a physician from receiving a fee for professional consultation services. (j) Exercising influence within a patient-physician relationship for purposes of engaging a patient in sexual activity. A patient shall be presumed to be incapable of giving free, full, and informed consent to sexual activity with his or her physician. (k) Making deceptive, untrue, or fraudulent representations in or related to the practice of medicine or employing a trick or scheme in the practice of medicine. (l) Soliciting patients, either personally or through an agent, through the use of fraud, intimidation, undue influence, or a form of overreaching or vexatious conduct. A solicitation is any communication which directly or implicitly requests an immediate oral response from the recipient. (m) Failing to keep legible, as defined by department rule in consultation with the board, medical records that identify the licensed physician or the physician extender and supervising physician by name and professional title who is or are responsible for rendering, ordering, supervising, or billing for each diagnostic or treatment procedure and that justify the course of treatment of the patient, including, but not limited to, patient histories; examination results; test results; records of drugs prescribed, dispensed, or administered; and reports of consultations and hospitalizations. (n) Exercising influence on the patient or client in such a manner as to exploit the patient or client for financial gain of the licensee or of a third party, which shall include, but not be limited to, the promoting or selling of services, goods, appliances, or drugs. (o) Promoting or advertising on any prescription form of a community pharmacy unless the form shall also state “This prescription may be filled at any pharmacy of your choice.” (p) Performing professional services which have not been duly authorized by the patient or client, or his or her legal representative, except as provided in s. 743.064, s. 766.103, or s. 768.13. (q) Prescribing, dispensing, administering, mixing, or otherwise preparing a legend drug, including any controlled substance, other than in the course of the physician’s professional practice. For the purposes of this paragraph, it shall be legally presumed that prescribing, dispensing, administering, mixing, or otherwise preparing legend drugs, including all controlled substances, inappropriately or in excessive or inappropriate quantities is not in the best interest of the patient and is not in the course of the physician’s professional practice, without regard to his or her intent. (r) Prescribing, dispensing, or administering any medicinal drug appearing on any schedule set forth in chapter 893 by the physician to himself or herself, except one prescribed, dispensed, or administered to the physician by another practitioner authorized to prescribe, dispense, or administer medicinal drugs. (s) Being unable to practice medicine with reasonable skill and safety to patients by reason of illness or use of alcohol, drugs, narcotics, chemicals, or any other type of material or as a result of any mental or physical condition. In enforcing this paragraph, the department shall have, upon a finding of the State Surgeon General or the State Surgeon General’s designee that probable cause exists to believe that the licensee is unable to practice medicine because of the reasons stated in this paragraph, the authority to issue an order to compel a licensee to submit to a mental or physical examination by physicians designated by the department. If the licensee refuses to comply with such order, the department’s order directing such examination may be enforced by filing a petition for enforcement in the circuit court where the licensee resides or does business. The licensee against whom the petition is filed may not be named or identified by initials in any public court records or documents, and the proceedings shall be closed to the public. The department shall be entitled to the summary procedure provided in s. 51.011. A licensee or certificateholder affected under this paragraph shall at reasonable intervals be afforded an opportunity to demonstrate that he or she can resume the competent practice of medicine with reasonable skill and safety to patients. (t) Notwithstanding s. 456.072(2) but as specified in s. 456.50(2):1. Committing medical malpractice as defined in s. 456.50. The board shall give great weight to the provisions of s. 766.102 when enforcing this paragraph. Medical malpractice shall not be construed to require more than one instance, event, or act. 2. Committing gross medical malpractice. 3. Committing repeated medical malpractice as defined in s. 456.50. A person found by the board to have committed repeated medical malpractice based on s. 456.50 may not be licensed or continue to be licensed by this state to provide health care services as a medical doctor in this state. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to require that a physician be incompetent to practice medicine in order to be disciplined pursuant to this paragraph. A recommended order by an administrative law judge or a final order of the board finding a violation under this paragraph shall specify whether the licensee was found to have committed “gross medical malpractice,” “repeated medical malpractice,” or “medical malpractice,” or any combination thereof, and any publication by the board must so specify. (u) Performing any procedure or prescribing any therapy which, by the prevailing standards of medical practice in the community, would constitute experimentation on a human subject, without first obtaining full, informed, and written consent. (v) Practicing or offering to practice beyond the scope permitted by law or accepting and performing professional responsibilities which the licensee knows or has reason to know that he or she is not competent to perform. The board may establish by rule standards of practice and standards of care for particular practice settings, including, but not limited to, education and training, equipment and supplies, medications including anesthetics, assistance of and delegation to other personnel, transfer agreements, sterilization, records, performance of complex or multiple procedures, informed consent, and policy and procedure manuals. (w) Delegating professional responsibilities to a person when the licensee delegating such responsibilities knows or has reason to know that such person is not qualified by training, experience, or licensure to perform them. (x) Violating a lawful order of the board or department previously entered in a disciplinary hearing or failing to comply with a lawfully issued subpoena of the department. (y) Conspiring with another licensee or with any other person to commit an act, or committing an act, which would tend to coerce, intimidate, or preclude another licensee from lawfully advertising his or her services. (z) Procuring, or aiding or abetting in the procuring of, an unlawful termination of pregnancy. (aa) Presigning blank prescription forms. (bb) Prescribing any medicinal drug appearing on Schedule II in chapter 893 by the physician for office use. (cc) Prescribing, ordering, dispensing, administering, supplying, selling, or giving any drug which is a Schedule II amphetamine or a Schedule II sympathomimetic amine drug or any compound thereof, pursuant to chapter 893, to or for any person except for:1. The treatment of narcolepsy; hyperkinesis; behavioral syndrome characterized by the developmentally inappropriate symptoms of moderate to severe distractability, short attention span, hyperactivity, emotional lability, and impulsivity; or drug-induced brain dysfunction; 2. The differential diagnostic psychiatric evaluation of depression or the treatment of depression shown to be refractory to other therapeutic modalities; or 3. The clinical investigation of the effects of such drugs or compounds when an investigative protocol therefor is submitted to, reviewed, and approved by the board before such investigation is begun. (dd) Failing to supervise adequately the activities of those physician assistants, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, advanced practice registered nurses, or anesthesiologist assistants acting under the supervision of the physician. (ee) Prescribing, ordering, dispensing, administering, supplying, selling, or giving growth hormones, testosterone or its analogs, human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), or other hormones for the purpose of muscle building or to enhance athletic performance. For the purposes of this subsection, the term “muscle building” does not include the treatment of injured muscle. A prescription written for the drug products listed above may be dispensed by the pharmacist with the presumption that the prescription is for legitimate medical use. (ff) Prescribing, ordering, dispensing, administering, supplying, selling, or giving amygdalin (laetrile) to any person. (gg) Misrepresenting or concealing a material fact at any time during any phase of a licensing or disciplinary process or procedure. (hh) Improperly interfering with an investigation or with any disciplinary proceeding. (ii) Failing to report to the department any licensee under this chapter or under chapter 459 who the physician or physician assistant knows has violated the grounds for disciplinary action set out in the law under which that person is licensed and who provides health care services in a facility licensed under chapter 395, or a health maintenance organization certificated under part I of chapter 641, in which the physician or physician assistant also provides services. (jj) Being found by any court in this state to have provided corroborating written medical expert opinion attached to any statutorily required notice of claim or intent or to any statutorily required response rejecting a claim, without reasonable investigation. (kk) Failing to report to the board, in writing, within 30 days if action as defined in paragraph (b) has been taken against one’s license to practice medicine in another state, territory, or country. (ll) Advertising or holding oneself out as a board-certified specialist, if not qualified under s. 458.3312, in violation of this chapter. (mm) Failing to comply with the requirements of ss. 381.026 and 381.0261 to provide patients with information about their patient rights and how to file a patient complaint. (nn) Violating any provision of this chapter or chapter 456, or any rules adopted pursuant thereto. (oo) Providing deceptive or fraudulent expert witness testimony related to the practice of medicine. (pp) Applicable to a licensee who serves as the designated physician of a pain-management clinic as defined in s. 458.3265 or s. 459.0137:1. Registering a pain-management clinic through misrepresentation or fraud; 2. Procuring, or attempting to procure, the registration of a pain-management clinic for any other person by making, or causing to be made, any false representation; 3. Failing to comply with any requirement of chapter 499, the Florida Drug and Cosmetic Act; 21 U.S.C. ss. 301-392, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; 21 U.S.C. ss. 821 et seq., the Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act; or chapter 893, the Florida Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act; 4. Being convicted or found guilty of, regardless of adjudication to, a felony or any other crime involving moral turpitude, fraud, dishonesty, or deceit in any jurisdiction of the courts of this state, of any other state, or of the United States; 5. Being convicted of, or disciplined by a regulatory agency of the Federal Government or a regulatory agency of another state for, any offense that would constitute a violation of this chapter; 6. Being convicted of, or entering a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, regardless of adjudication, a crime in any jurisdiction of the courts of this state, of any other state, or of the United States which relates to the practice of, or the ability to practice, a licensed health care profession; 7. Being convicted of, or entering a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, regardless of adjudication, a crime in any jurisdiction of the courts of this state, of any other state, or of the United States which relates to health care fraud; 8. Dispensing any medicinal drug based upon a communication that purports to be a prescription as defined in s. 465.003 or s. 893.02 if the dispensing practitioner knows or has reason to believe that the purported prescription is not based upon a valid practitioner-patient relationship; or 9. Failing to timely notify the board of the date of his or her termination from a pain-management clinic as required by s. 458.3265(3). (qq) Failing to timely notify the department of the theft of prescription blanks from a pain-management clinic or a breach of a physician’s electronic prescribing software within 24 hours as required by s. 458.3265(3). (rr) Promoting or advertising through any communication media the use, sale, or dispensing of any controlled substance appearing on any schedule in chapter 893. (ss) Dispensing a controlled substance listed in Schedule II or Schedule III in violation of s. 465.0276. (tt) Willfully failing to comply with s. 627.64194 or s. 641.513 with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice. 1(uu) Issuing a physician certification, as defined in s. 381.986, in a manner out of compliance with the requirements of that section and rules adopted thereunder. (vv) Performing a liposuction procedure in which more than 1,000 cubic centimeters of supernatant fat is removed, a Level II office surgery, or a Level III office surgery in an office that is not registered with the department pursuant to s. 458.328 or s. 459.0138. (ww) Implanting a patient or causing a patient to be implanted with a human embryo created with the human reproductive material, as defined in s. 784.086, of the licensee, or inseminating a patient or causing a patient to be inseminated with the human reproductive material of the licensee. (2) The board may enter an order denying licensure or imposing any of the penalties in s. 456.072(2) against any applicant for licensure or licensee who is found guilty of violating any provision of subsection (1) of this section or who is found guilty of violating any provision of s. 456.072(1). In determining what action is appropriate, the board must first consider what sanctions are necessary to protect the public or to compensate the patient. Only after those sanctions have been imposed may the disciplining authority consider and include in the order requirements designed to rehabilitate the physician. All costs associated with compliance with orders issued under this subsection are the obligation of the physician. (3) In any administrative action against a physician which does not involve revocation or suspension of license, the division shall have the burden, by the greater weight of the evidence, to establish the existence of grounds for disciplinary action. The division shall establish grounds for revocation or suspension of license by clear and convincing evidence. (4) The board shall not reinstate the license of a physician, or cause a license to be issued to a person it deems or has deemed unqualified, until such time as it is satisfied that he or she has complied with all the terms and conditions set forth in the final order and that such person is capable of safely engaging in the practice of medicine. However, the board may not issue a license to, or reinstate the license of, any medical doctor found by the board to have committed repeated medical malpractice based on s. 456.50, regardless of the extent to which the licensee or prospective licensee has complied with all terms and conditions set forth in the final order and is capable of safely engaging in the practice of medicine. (5) The board shall by rule establish guidelines for the disposition of disciplinary cases involving specific types of violations. Such guidelines may include minimum and maximum fines, periods of supervision or probation, or conditions of probation or reissuance of a license. “Gross medical malpractice,” “repeated medical malpractice,” and “medical malpractice,” under paragraph (1)(t) shall each be considered distinct types of violations requiring specific individual guidelines. (6) Upon the department’s receipt from an insurer or self-insurer of a report of a closed claim against a physician pursuant to s. 627.912 or from a health care practitioner of a report pursuant to s. 456.049, or upon the receipt from a claimant of a presuit notice against a physician pursuant to s. 766.106, the department shall review each report and determine whether it potentially involved conduct by a licensee that is subject to disciplinary action, in which case the provisions of s. 456.073 shall apply. However, if it is reported that a physician has had three or more claims with indemnities exceeding $50,000 each within the previous 5-year period, the department shall investigate the occurrences upon which the claims were based and determine if action by the department against the physician is warranted. (7) Upon the department’s receipt from the Agency for Health Care Administration pursuant to s. 395.0197 of the name of a physician whose conduct may constitute grounds for disciplinary action by the department, the department shall investigate the occurrences upon which the report was based and determine if action by the department against the physician is warranted. (8) If any physician regulated by the Division of Medical Quality Assurance is guilty of such unprofessional conduct, negligence, or mental or physical incapacity or impairment that the division determines that the physician is unable to practice with reasonable skill and safety and presents a danger to patients, the division shall be authorized to maintain an action in circuit court enjoining such physician from providing medical services to the public until the physician demonstrates the ability to practice with reasonable skill and safety and without danger to patients. (9) When an investigation of a physician is undertaken, the department shall promptly furnish to the physician or the physician’s attorney a copy of the complaint or document which resulted in the initiation of the investigation. For purposes of this subsection, such documents include, but are not limited to: the pertinent portions of an annual report submitted to the department pursuant to s. 395.0197(6); a report of an adverse incident which is provided to the department pursuant to s. 395.0197; a report of peer review disciplinary action submitted to the department pursuant to s. 395.0193(4) or s. 458.337, providing that the investigations, proceedings, and records relating to such peer review disciplinary action shall continue to retain their privileged status even as to the licensee who is the subject of the investigation, as provided by ss. 395.0193(8) and 458.337(3); a report of a closed claim submitted pursuant to s. 627.912; a presuit notice submitted pursuant to s. 766.106(2); and a petition brought under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, pursuant to s. 766.305(2). The physician may submit a written response to the information contained in the complaint or document which resulted in the initiation of the investigation within 45 days after service to the physician of the complaint or document. The physician’s written response shall be considered by the probable cause panel. (10) A probable cause panel convened to consider disciplinary action against a physician assistant alleged to have violated s. 456.072 or this section must include one physician assistant. The physician assistant must hold a valid license to practice as a physician assistant in this state and be appointed to the panel by the Council of Physician Assistants. The physician assistant may hear only cases involving disciplinary actions against a physician assistant. If the appointed physician assistant is not present at the disciplinary hearing, the panel may consider the matter and vote on the case in the absence of the physician assistant. The training requirements set forth in s. 458.307(4) do not apply to the appointed physician assistant. Rules need not be adopted to implement this subsection. (11) The purpose of this section is to facilitate uniform discipline for those acts made punishable under this section and, to this end, a reference to this section constitutes a general reference under the doctrine of incorporation by reference. History.—ss. 1, 8, ch. 79-302; s. 2, ch. 80-354; s. 297, ch. 81-259; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 2, 4, ch. 82-32; s. 15, ch. 83-329; s. 1, ch. 85-6; s. 4, ch. 85-175; ss. 18, 25, 26, ch. 86-245; s. 25, ch. 88-1; s. 18, ch. 89-275; s. 16, ch. 89-283; ss. 11, 72, ch. 89-374; s. 2, ch. 90-44; s. 4, ch. 90-60; s. 26, ch. 90-228; s. 60, ch. 91-220; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 39, ch. 92-149; s. 1, ch. 92-178; s. 83, ch. 92-289; s. 218, ch. 96-410; s. 1090, ch. 97-103; s. 106, ch. 97-261; s. 23, ch. 97-264; s. 37, ch. 98-89; s. 46, ch. 98-166; s. 222, ch. 99-8; s. 99, ch. 99-397; s. 105, ch. 2000-160; ss. 21, 76, ch. 2001-277; s. 25, ch. 2003-416; s. 2, ch. 2004-303; s. 3, ch. 2005-240; s. 3, ch. 2005-266; s. 1, ch. 2006-242; s. 73, ch. 2008-6; s. 6, ch. 2010-211; s. 6, ch. 2011-141; s. 2, ch. 2011-233; s. 2, ch. 2013-166; s. 17, ch. 2016-145; s. 9, ch. 2016-222; s. 22, ch. 2016-224; s. 8, ch. 2017-41; ss. 1, 4, ch. 2017-232; s. 14, ch. 2018-13; s. 50, ch. 2018-106; s. 6, ch. 2019-112; s. 4, ch. 2019-130; s. 4, ch. 2020-31; s. 14, ch. 2022-35. 1Note.—Section 1, ch. 2017-232, provides that “[i]t is the intent of the Legislature to implement s. 29, Article X of the State Constitution by creating a unified regulatory structure. If s. 29, Article X of the State Constitution is amended or a constitutional amendment related to cannabis or marijuana is adopted, this act shall expire 6 months after the effective date of such amendment.” If such amendment or adoption takes place, paragraph (1)(uu), as created by s. 4, ch. 2017-232, is repealed.
| |
Annotations, Discussions, Cases:
Cases Citing Statute 458.331
Total Results: 125
129 F.3d 1196
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 21, 1997 | Docket: 421872
Cited 53 times | Published
Medicine,
anyway. See Fla. Stat. Ann. § 458.331(1)(c) and (q).
Whether characterized as
129 F.3d 1196, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 33310, 1997 WL 725218
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 21, 1997 | Docket: 817270
Cited 52 times | Published
Medicine, anyway.
See
Fla. Stat. Ann. § 458.331(l)(c) and (q).
Whether characterized as “voluntary”
789 So. 2d 405, 2001 WL 608969
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2001 | Docket: 107039
Cited 25 times | Published
medicine also provide guidance on this issue. Section 458.331, Florida Statutes (1991),[2] enumerates grounds
819 So. 2d 997, 2002 WL 1389304
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2002 | Docket: 1750101
Cited 20 times | Published
deviated from the standard of care defined by section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2000).[2] Gross asserts
959 So. 2d 176, 2007 WL 1498968
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2007 | Docket: 528349
Cited 16 times | Published
his or her license and other discipline. See § 458.331(1)(nn), Fla. Stat. (2006) (stating that "[violating]
456 So. 2d 939
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1984 | Docket: 1447050
Cited 16 times | Published
complaint with thirteen counts of violations of section 458.331(1), Florida Statutes, concerning the inappropriate
458 So. 2d 302
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1984 | Docket: 1453004
Cited 14 times | Published
replaced in chapter 79-302, Laws of Florida, by section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (1979).[2] With regard
808 So. 2d 243, 2002 WL 83679
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 2002 | Docket: 2191393
Cited 13 times | Published
rule 64B8-9.009(4)(b), the Board relied on section 458.331(1)(v), Florida Statutes (1999), which authorizes
611 So. 2d 1305, 1992 WL 386387
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1992 | Docket: 1674161
Cited 11 times | Published
identical terms are broader in scope. For example, section 458.331(1)(i), proscribing payment or acceptance of
463 So. 2d 328
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1985 | Docket: 448873
Cited 11 times | Published
never practiced medicine in the United States.
Section 458.331(1), Florida Statutes (1979) empowers the Board
831 So. 2d 692, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15253, 2002 WL 31355613
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2002 | Docket: 2570213
Cited 10 times | Published
505(1)(a) prohibit any split fee arrangement. Section 458.331(1)(i) provides that it is grounds for disciplinary
433 So. 2d 544
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1983 | Docket: 1727557
Cited 8 times | Published
also by the use of the phrase "any person" in Section 458.331(2), Florida Statutes. The Board likewise rejects
948 So. 2d 803, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21558, 2006 WL 3780681
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2006 | Docket: 1769930
Cited 7 times | Published
evidence in any administrative or civil action.
Section 458.331 entitled "Grounds for disciplinary action;
864 So. 2d 79, 2003 WL 23008852
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 2003 | Docket: 1426075
Cited 7 times | Published
default and sanctioning Patz for violations of section 458.331 of the Florida Statutes. We affirm.
On October
816 So. 2d 1237, 2002 WL 1070896
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2002 | Docket: 2524521
Cited 7 times | Published
part because of referrals, is a violation of section 458.331(1)(k), Florida Statutes. Payment of a reasonable
574 So. 2d 164, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9454, 1990 WL 205438
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1990 | Docket: 1436530
Cited 7 times | Published
proceedings was appellant's alleged violation of section 458.331(1)(l), Florida Statutes (1983), which prohibits
463 So. 2d 215, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 90, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3200
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1985 | Docket: 1509692
Cited 7 times | Published
reasonable skill and safety" as provided in section 458.331(1)(s), Florida Statutes (1981). Petitioner
943 So. 2d 909, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20073, 2006 WL 3454494
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2006 | Docket: 1526773
Cited 6 times | Published
conviction, the ALJ found that Appellant violated section 458.331(1)(c), Florida Statutes (2002), which provides
806 So. 2d 633, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1359, 2002 WL 205796
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2002 | Docket: 1712986
Cited 6 times | Published
complaint, DOH alleged that Ocampo violated section 458.331(1)(b), Florida Statutes, by having
a license
675 So. 2d 666, 1996 WL 329512
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1996 | Docket: 1694405
Cited 6 times | Published
against Dr. Borrego, alleging that he violated section 458.331(1)(c), Florida Statutes, which authorizes disciplinary
534 So. 2d 782, 1988 WL 122614
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1988 | Docket: 1359035
Cited 6 times | Published
appellant charging him with violations of Section 458.331, Florida Statutes (1987), which enumerates
489 So. 2d 883, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1321, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8249
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1986 | Docket: 545981
Cited 6 times | Published
prescription practices for the patients as covered by section 458.331(1)(g), (h), (q) and (t), Florida Statutes (1985)
482 So. 2d 501, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 239
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1986 | Docket: 1770033
Cited 6 times | Published
charging him with violation of four provisions of section 458.331(1), Florida Statutes (1982). After a hearing
481 So. 2d 61, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 34
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1985 | Docket: 548649
Cited 6 times | Published
patient. Count two alleged a violation of Section 458.331(1)(k) which prohibits exercising influence
481 So. 2d 61, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 34
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1985 | Docket: 548649
Cited 6 times | Published
patient. Count two alleged a violation of Section 458.331(1)(k) which prohibits exercising influence
478 So. 2d 1116, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2525, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16667
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1985 | Docket: 1741548
Cited 6 times | Published
stated that appellant was in violation of section 458.331(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1983), which provides
454 So. 2d 795
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1984 | Docket: 77212
Cited 6 times | Published
clear and convincing evidence, violations of Section 458.331(1)(n), Florida Statutes, in that the Respondent
443 So. 2d 373
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1983 | Docket: 1459050
Cited 6 times | Published
conclusions of law, but mistakenly applied Section 458.331(2)(e), Florida Statutes (1979), when it determined
432 So. 2d 117
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1983 | Docket: 1677353
Cited 6 times | Published
v. J.W.C. Co., Inc. (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
[8] § 458.331(2), Fla. Stat. (1981); § 893.11, Fla. Stat. (1981)
962 So. 2d 1011, 2007 WL 2254544
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2007 | Docket: 480814
Cited 5 times | Published
the Department with regard to violations of section 458.331(1)(m), (q) and (t), Florida Statutes. Further
920 So. 2d 27, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16464, 2005 WL 2649177
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2005 | Docket: 1730593
Cited 5 times | Published
misconduct encompassed by the language of Section 458.331(1)(q), Florida Statutes, was discussed at length
890 So. 2d 1165, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19698, 2004 WL 2964085
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2004 | Docket: 1690371
Cited 5 times | Published
judge (ALJ) finding that he did not violate section 458.331(1)(m), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1996),[1] which
886 So. 2d 1007, 2004 WL 2402638
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2004 | Docket: 1380164
Cited 5 times | Published
disciplinary provision of the Medical Practice Act, section 458.331(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1999), which is worded
881 So. 2d 682, 2004 WL 1905731
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2004 | Docket: 1466250
Cited 5 times | Published
alleging that Dr. Malave had violated (1) section 458.331(1)(j), Florida Statutes (2002), by exercising
776 So. 2d 1073, 2001 WL 99193
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2001 | Docket: 2553229
Cited 5 times | Published
been fined and suspended for violations of section 458.331, Florida Statutes. In analyzing the issue,
196 B.R. 641, 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 398, 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 615, 29 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 162
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: May 30, 1996 | Docket: 1758738
Cited 5 times | Published
the judgment (emphasis added).
Florida Statute § 458.331 provides:
(1) The following acts shall constitute
172 B.R. 686, 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 204, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 1491
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Sep 19, 1994 | Docket: 1868298
Cited 5 times | Published
by Gerard D. Grau of F.S. § 458.320(5)(g) and § 458.331(1)(a) and (g) for failure to pay Branham's adverse
536 So. 2d 1094, 1988 WL 122616
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1988 | Docket: 1760014
Cited 5 times | Published
minimum requirements for safe practice," and section 458.331(3), forbidding the Board from issuing a license
880 So. 2d 667, 2004 WL 1574024
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2004 | Docket: 1294933
Cited 4 times | Published
amendment, if adopted, clearly would supercede section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2003),[1] and revoke
879 So. 2d 1244, 2004 WL 825514
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2004 | Docket: 1514435
Cited 4 times | Published
administrative law judge found Dr. Aldrete violated section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (1999), count I of
654 So. 2d 205
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1995 | Docket: 1710337
Cited 4 times | Published
that appellant had on two occasions violated section 458.331(1)(j), Florida Statutes. Because the administrative
638 So. 2d 574, 1994 WL 231283
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1994 | Docket: 1168826
Cited 4 times | Published
reverse.
Dr. McCarthy was charged with violating section 458.331(1)(m) and (t), Florida Statutes,[1] in his
492 So. 2d 697, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1500
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1986 | Docket: 478179
Cited 4 times | Published
exist.
Appellant was found to have violated section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes, by engaging in gross
490 So. 2d 987, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1343
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1986 | Docket: 1743101
Cited 4 times | Published
virtue of his past impairment he had violated Section 458.331(1)(s), Florida Statutes (1983) (Grounds for
465 So. 2d 1324, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 722
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1985 | Docket: 1324410
Cited 4 times | Published
Sternberg had violated paragraphs (l) and (o) of section 458.331(1), Florida Statutes (1981).[1] We affirm in
5 F. Supp. 3d 1350, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28824, 2014 WL 888644
District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2014 | Docket: 64293751
Cited 3 times | Published
prohibition against physician fee-splitting, § Fla. Stat. 458.331(l)(i). In addition, United alleges that defendants
902 So. 2d 893, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8085, 2005 WL 1262871
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2005 | Docket: 1257080
Cited 3 times | Published
care profession is prohibited.
In addition, section 458.331(1)(j) sets out the following additional ground
838 So. 2d 676, 2003 WL 728388
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2003 | Docket: 461452
Cited 3 times | Published
probable cause to believe that Spuza had violated section 458.331(1)(c), Florida Statutes (2001), and it directed
852 So. 2d 254, 2001 WL 111037
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2001 | Docket: 1305594
Cited 3 times | Published
his or her license to practice medicine. See § 458.331(2), Fla. Stat. (1999); see also Jones, 640 So
714 So. 2d 1113, 23 Fla. L. Weekly 1677, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8471, 1998 WL 390443
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1998 | Docket: 461581
Cited 3 times | Published
circumstances. Nevertheless, Dr. Ghani violated section 458.331, Florida Statutes (1993), by failing to practice
676 So. 2d 1380, 1996 WL 346971
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1996 | Docket: 1693025
Cited 3 times | Published
treatment for seven patients in violation of section 458.331(m). The agency did not pursue the records charge
655 So. 2d 197, 1995 WL 316546
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1995 | Docket: 1696756
Cited 3 times | Published
review granted, 525 N.W.2d 732 (Wis. 1994); see § 458.331, Fla. Stat. (1993).
[8] In accordance with the
638 So. 2d 542, 1994 WL 180383
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1994 | Docket: 1652554
Cited 3 times | Published
Ferris v. Turlington, 510 So.2d 292 (Fla. 1987); § 458.331(3), Fla. Stat. (1991). The Vermont Board rejected
581 So. 2d 1375, 1991 WL 103462
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1991 | Docket: 1683795
Cited 3 times | Published
that criteria for reinstatement are found in Section 458.331(3), Florida Statutes (1983),[2] which provided:
567 So. 2d 469
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1990 | Docket: 1721404
Cited 3 times | Published
treatment of a patient in accordance with section 458.331(1)(m), Florida Statutes (1987). Because there
563 So. 2d 805, 1990 WL 89759
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1990 | Docket: 1281321
Cited 3 times | Published
appellant was guilty of ten violations of Section 458.331(1), Florida Statutes (1981, 1983, & 1985).
531 So. 2d 411, 1988 WL 98573
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1988 | Docket: 544204
Cited 3 times | Published
that Dr. Major had not violated, as charged, Section 458.331(1)(s), Florida Statutes (1985). The hearing
454 So. 2d 683, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1689, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14453
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 1984 | Docket: 444525
Cited 3 times | Published
reasonable skill and safety as required by Section 458.331(3), Florida Statutes."
In July, 1983, Griffith
421 So. 2d 573
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1982 | Docket: 1719432
Cited 3 times | Published
unconstitutional ex post facto application of Section 458.331, Florida Statutes (1979), and the failure of
405 So. 2d 465, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21381
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1981 | Docket: 2590034
Cited 3 times | Published
appellant's argument that Florida Statutes Section 458.331(4) requires appellant's reinstatement because
107 So. 3d 1139, 2012 WL 6603033, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21666
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2012 | Docket: 60228564
Cited 2 times | Published
Count 1 charged Gonzalez-Gomez with violating section 458.331(l)(c), Florida Statutes (2009), by being convicted
669 So. 2d 1160, 1996 WL 124204
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1996 | Docket: 146083
Cited 2 times | Published
determination that the proposal would not violate section 458.331(1)(i), Florida States. The petition explained:
542 So. 2d 457, 1989 WL 43361
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1989 | Docket: 468876
Cited 2 times | Published
safely engaging in the practice of medicine." § 458.331(3), Fla. Stat. (1987). The Board's reason for
528 So. 2d 908
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1988 | Docket: 1717311
Cited 2 times | Published
this case, has been in effect since 1979. See § 458.331(1)(n), Fla. Stat. (1985). According to a pleading
448 So. 2d 1087
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1984 | Docket: 429663
Cited 2 times | Published
basis for disciplining a physician pursuant to Section 458.331, as required by Section 458.313(1)(b), Florida
797 F.3d 859, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13070, 2015 WL 4530452
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 28, 2015 | Docket: 2677703
Cited 1 times | Published
disclose information regarding the procedure); id. § 458.331 (listing various grounds for disciplinary action
175 So. 3d 815, 2015 WL 3516737
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2015 | Docket: 2662141
Cited 1 times | Published
So.2d 542, 542 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Although section 458.331, Florida Statutes, allowed the board to revoke
19 So. 3d 392, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8694, 2009 WL 1883893
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2009 | Docket: 1651187
Cited 1 times | Published
committed medical malpractice pursuant to section 458.331(1)(t)1., Florida Statutes (2005), by failing
994 So. 2d 416, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 16424, 2008 WL 4643822
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2008 | Docket: 1666674
Cited 1 times | Published
reasonably prudent physician in violation of section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2007). Because the
882 So. 2d 402, 2004 WL 1621440
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2004 | Docket: 1289633
Cited 1 times | Published
establish rules governing standards of practice. Section 458.331, Florida Statutes (2002), sets forth grounds
716 So. 2d 873, 1998 WL 569171
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 1998 | Docket: 1521949
Cited 1 times | Published
disciplinary statute which Boedy violated, section 458.331, Florida Statutes, authorized the Board to
547 So. 2d 948, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1486, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3515, 1989 WL 65896
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1989 | Docket: 64644439
Cited 1 times | Published
subject to disciplinary action pursuant to section 458.331(l)(w), Florida Statutes (1983), and which suspended
528 So. 2d 1, 1988 WL 8096
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1988 | Docket: 1717589
Cited 1 times | Published
avoid discipline under section 458.331, Florida Statutes.
Under section 458.331(1)(t) "gross or repeated"
501 So. 2d 740, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 438
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1987 | Docket: 2569630
Cited 1 times | Published
medicine or to the ability to practice medicine," section 458.331(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1985), so as to form
471 So. 2d 1305, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1492
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1985 | Docket: 1396932
Cited 1 times | Published
provide grounds for disciplinary action under Section 458.331, Florida Statutes. Respondent seeks to deny
453 So. 2d 842
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1984 | Docket: 1651277
Cited 1 times | Published
*843 cites Section 455.241(1) and (2) and Section 458.331(1)(n), Florida Statutes (1983), and contends
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2024 | Docket: 68511409
Published
appellant regardless of license status. Id. (citing
§ 458.331(2), Fla. Stat.).
Appellant attempts to distinguish
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2024 | Docket: 68443448
Published
certificate
on his office wall, thereby violating section 458.331(1)(nn), Florida Statutes
(2021), through a
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2022 | Docket: 65346491
Published
averred that in doing so,
Appellee violated section 458.331(1)(n), Florida Statutes, which
authorizes imposition
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2021 | Docket: 59295936
Published
order alleged that Dr. Stover had violated section
458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes, and Rule 64B8-9.009(2)(f)
271 So. 3d 1178
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019 | Docket: 14988965
Published
(declaring that appellate courts may no longer
2 Section 458.331(1)(t), Fla. Stat. (2012) (subjecting a licensee
255 So. 3d 515
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2018 | Docket: 8015402
Published
4
Section 458.331(1)(v), Florida Statutes (2017), subjects a
249 So. 3d 1278
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2018 | Docket: 7254059
Published
nine-count complaint
that Dr. Omulepu violated § 458.331(1), Florida Statutes (2014).
According to the
814 F.3d 1159, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 21573, 2015 WL 8639875
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 14, 2015 | Docket: 3020788
Published
disclose information regarding the procedure); id. § 458.331 (listing various grounds for disciplinary action
161 So. 3d 416, 2014 WL 941904, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3491
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2014 | Docket: 60247134
Published
(reversing the finding that Ghani violated section 458.331, Florida Statutes (1993), by failing to order
109 So. 3d 296, 2013 WL 811824, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3501
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2013 | Docket: 60229546
Published
the applicable standard of care or violate section 458.331(l)(t), are supported by substantial, competent
983 So. 2d 632, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 6689, 2008 WL 1986267
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2008 | Docket: 1756361
Published
ALJ. Appellant was found to have violated section 458.331, Florida Statutes. The ALJ recommended, and
963 So. 2d 790, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10978, 2007 WL 2043453
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 2007 | Docket: 64852011
Published
non-compliance with the notification requirements of section 458.331(l)(kk), Florida Statutes, despite the fact
908 So. 2d 1108, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11062, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1719
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2005 | Docket: 64840009
Published
prudent similar physician in violation of section 458.331(l)(t), Florida Statutes, and with failing to
885 So. 2d 873, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8396, 2004 WL 1336447
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 2004 | Docket: 64833875
Published
physicians, which contains the following, in Section 458.331:
(1) The following acts constitute grounds
869 So. 2d 1221, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3879, 2004 WL 592159
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2004 | Docket: 64829551
Published
exploitation of a patient in violation of section 458.331(l)(n), Florida Statutes (2002). Because the
866 So. 2d 733, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 934
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2004 | Docket: 64828352
Published
complaint against Lusskin, finding a violation of section 458.331(l)(s), Florida Statutes, and citing Lusskin’s
862 So. 2d 920, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19784, 2003 WL 23094595
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2003 | Docket: 64827318
Published
cause existed to believe that Liss violated section 458.331(1)(c), Florida Statutes (2001), and it directed
852 So. 2d 254, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1217
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2001 | Docket: 64824348
Published
his or her license to practice medicine. See § 458.331(2), Fla. Stat. (1999); see also Jones, 640 So
Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jul 9, 1999 | Docket: 3258333
Published
initiate the investigation of a physician. Section 458.331(9), Florida Statutes (1998 Supplement), provides:
715 So. 2d 285, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 6160, 1998 WL 281345
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1998 | Docket: 64782024
Published
penalties provided by the disciplinary guidelines. § 458.331(2), Fla. Stat. (1997); Fla. Admin. Code R. 64-B8-8
700 So. 2d 383, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8622, 1997 WL 422524
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1997 | Docket: 64776161
Published
practice medicine with reasonable skill and safety.” § 458.331(1)(s), Florida Statutes (1995).
Because we reverse
688 So. 2d 388, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 380, 1997 WL 43862
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1997 | Docket: 64771230
Published
statute governing his licensing proceeding, section 458.331(l)(c), specifically provided that a nolo contendere
668 So. 2d 1062, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1599, 1996 WL 82194
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1996 | Docket: 64762745
Published
violating section 458.331(l)(m), Florida Statutes, and four counts of violating section 458.331(l)(t), Florida
654 So. 2d 205, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4171, 1995 WL 232499
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1995 | Docket: 64755881
Published
that appellant had on two occasions violated section 458.331(1)©, Florida Statutes. Because the administrative
615 So. 2d 755, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2383, 1993 WL 53141
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 1993 | Docket: 64695074
Published
requirement) is invalid because it is unauthorized by section 458.-331(2), Florida Statutes.
*756We strike the imposition
608 So. 2d 75, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10956, 1992 WL 296130
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1992 | Docket: 64691775
Published
the complaint.
. The Ayala court construed section 458.-331(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1983), which sets
590 So. 2d 477, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11951, 1991 WL 253374
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1991 | Docket: 64663720
Published
The Board relies upon the express language of § 458.-331(4), Florida Statutes (1987), which provides:
573 So. 2d 349, 1990 WL 192306
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1991 | Docket: 1518819
Published
J., L.I., and D.B., Lieberman had violated section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (1985), by failing
568 So. 2d 486, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7916, 1990 WL 154772
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 1990 | Docket: 64653812
Published
action, as appellant was charged with violating section 458.-331(l)(b), Florida Statutes, which specifies that
574 So. 2d 153, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4516, 1990 WL 85424
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1990 | Docket: 64656303
Published
similar conditions and circumstances, under section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes. Count II charged a
556 So. 2d 766, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 595, 1990 WL 7628
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1990 | Docket: 64648055
Published
specific finding that the statutory provision, § 458.331(l)(t), Florida Statutes (1985), challenged by
542 So. 2d 1010, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 681, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1349, 1989 WL 21430
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1989 | Docket: 64642246
Published
physician’s financial interest, is sanctioned by section 458.331(l)(gg), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1986). Thus
532 So. 2d 47, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2269, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4478, 1988 WL 103938
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 1988 | Docket: 64637469
Published
appellant was guilty of gross malpractice under Section 458.331(t), Florida Statutes, by underestimating A
528 So. 2d 908, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4303
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1988 | Docket: 64636126
Published
this case, has been in effect since 1979. See § 458.331(1)(n), Fla.Stat. (1985). According to a pleading
522 So. 2d 77, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 581, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 852, 1988 WL 17829
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1988 | Docket: 64633563
Published
allegations of sexual misconduct with patients. Section 458.331(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1983) provides that
518 So. 2d 390, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 66, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11845, 1987 WL 31985
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1987 | Docket: 64631985
Published
1985), in which a mandatory interpretation of section 458.-331(l)(c), providing that a nolo plea “shall be
519 So. 2d 1019, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2768, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11417, 1987 WL 39239
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1987 | Docket: 64632612
Published
to note my agreement that the language of section 458.331(l)(n), Florida Statutes (1985), requiring that
498 So. 2d 481, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2188, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10214
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 1986 | Docket: 64623454
Published
(Fla. 1st DCA 1985), Dr. Maravel argues that Section 458.331(3) is inapplicable because it relates to reinstatement
492 So. 2d 481, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1784, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9347
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 1986 | Docket: 64620978
Published
reasonable skill and safety as required by Section 458.-331(3), F.S.” Thereafter Griffith filed a petition
473 So. 2d 761, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1711, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15169
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1985 | Docket: 64613499
Published
conditions and circumstances.” See Fla. Stat. section 458.331(l)(t)(1981). Appellant contends that the Department’s
461 So. 2d 200, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2630, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16496
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1984 | Docket: 64608960
Published
necessary for adequate review by this court.
. § 458.331(3), F.S., provides:
“(3) The board shall not reinstate
458 So. 2d 302, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1732, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14576
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1984 | Docket: 64607796
Published
replaced in chapter 79-302, Laws of Florida, by section 458.-331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (1979).2 With regard
448 So. 2d 1087, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12398
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1984 | Docket: 64604296
Published
basis for disciplining a physician pursuant to Section 458.331, as required by Section 458.-313(l)(b), Florida
446 So. 2d 186, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11737
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1984 | Docket: 64603264
Published
Florida Statutes (1977), is now codified at section 458.331(l)(g), Florida Statutes (1981). This statute
444 So. 2d 503, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11363
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1984 | Docket: 64602400
Published
skill and safety” under the provisions of Section 458.-331(l)(s), Florida Statutes (1981). This subsection
432 So. 2d 117, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19924
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1983 | Docket: 64597266
Published
v. J.W.C. Co., Inc. (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
. § 458.331(2), Fla.Stat. (1981); § 893.11, Fla. Stat. (1981)
428 So. 2d 758, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18939
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1983 | Docket: 64595882
Published
or other disciplinary action, pursuant to section 458.331, Florida Statutes (1981). Power to act finally
429 So. 2d 1225, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18828
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1983 | Docket: 64596454
Published
find that the standard of conduct required by section 458.331(1)(t), Fla.Stat. (1981)4 is not so nebulous
429 So. 2d 1225, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18828
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1983 | Docket: 64596454
Published
find that the standard of conduct required by section 458.331(1)(t), Fla.Stat. (1981)4 is not so nebulous
