Florida Statute 463.008 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS

Chapter 463
OPTOMETRY

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 463.008

463.008 Inactive status.—

(1) The board shall adopt rules relating to application procedures for inactive status, for the biennial renewal of inactive licenses, and for the reactivation of licenses. The board shall prescribe by rule an application fee for inactive status, a renewal fee for inactive status, a delinquency fee, and a fee for the reactivation of a license. None of these fees may exceed the biennial renewal fee established by the board for an active license.

(2) The department may not reactivate a license unless the inactive or delinquent licensee has paid any applicable biennial renewal or delinquency fee, or both, and a reactivation fee.

History.—ss. 1, 6, ch. 79-194; s. 316, ch. 81-259; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; s. 100, ch. 83-329; ss. 9, 20, 21, ch. 86-289; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 174, ch. 94-119.

F.S. 463.008 on Google Scholar

F.S. 463.008 on Casetext

Amendments to 463.008

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 463.008

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 463.008.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 463.008

Total Results: 4

State v. Yanes

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1970-02-04T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 231 So. 2d 212, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2854

Snippet: final judgment of the trial court holding Section 463.08, Florida Statutes 1967, F.S.A., unconstitutional….’ * * * It is the Court’s finding that Chapter 463.08 is unconstitutional in that it deprives the Defendant…the final judgment, although referring to Section 463.08 in several instances, are obviously directed to…a registered optometrist, being in violation of 463.08 Florida Statutes.” . 114 Fla. 670, 154 So. 690

Jacksonville Express. Auth. v. Henry G. Du Pree Co.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1959-01-20T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 108 So. 2d 289

Snippet: Authority of Shreveport v. Green, 1942, 200 La. 463, 8 So.2d 295, 299. This burden cannot be met by mere

Weber v. Florida State Board of Optometry

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1954-06-15T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 73 So. 2d 408, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1541

Snippet: that the exemption to “physicians” under Section 463.08, F.S.A. included and authorized him to practice…question turns on the ‘interpretation of Section 463.08, F.S.A. ás follows: “It shall be unlawful for anyone… “physicians” as used in the proviso to Section 463.08, F.S.A. did not include licensed naturopaths and…were not “physicians” as contemplated by Section 463.08, F.S.A. and in thereby refusing to exempt naturopaths…appellant was a physician as contemplated by Section 463.08, F.S.A. It is not denied that Dr. Weber has the

Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Peters

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1949-12-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 43 So. 2d 448, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 1068

Snippet: Skinner v. Henderson, 1890, 26 Fla. 121, 7 So. 463, 8 L.R.A. 55, we held that the construction of a bridge