Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 517.072 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 517.072 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 517.072

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 517
SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 517.072
517.072 Viatical settlement investments.
(1) The exemptions provided for by s. 517.051(6) and (11) do not apply to a viatical settlement investment.
(2) The offering of a viatical settlement investment is not an exempt transaction under s. 517.061(10), (12), (13), and (18), regardless of whether the offering otherwise complies with the conditions of that section, unless such offering is to a qualified institutional buyer.
(3) The registration provisions of ss. 517.07 and 517.12 do not apply to any of the following transactions in viatical settlement investments; however, such transactions in viatical settlement investments are subject to s. 517.301:
(a) The transfer or assignment of an interest in a previously viaticated policy from a natural person who transfers or assigns no more than one such interest in a single calendar year.
(b) The provision of stop-loss coverage to a viatical settlement provider, financing entity, or related provider trust, as those terms are defined in s. 626.9911, by an authorized or eligible insurer.
(c) The transfer or assignment of a viaticated policy from a licensed viatical settlement provider to another licensed viatical settlement provider, a related provider trust, a financing entity, or a special purpose entity, as those terms are defined in s. 626.9911, or to a contingency insurer, provided that such transfer or assignment is not the direct or indirect promotion of any scheme or enterprise with the intent of violating or evading this chapter.
(d) The transfer or assignment of a viaticated policy to a bank, trust company, savings institution, insurance company, dealer, investment company as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, pension or profit-sharing trust, qualified institutional buyer, or an accredited investor, provided such transfer or assignment is not for the direct or indirect promotion of any scheme or enterprise with the intent of violating or evading any provision of this chapter.
(e) The transfer or assignment of a viaticated policy by a conservator of a viatical settlement provider appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction who transfers or assigns ownership of viaticated policies pursuant to that court’s order.
(4) The commission may establish by rule requirements and standards for disclosures to purchasers of viatical settlement investments and recordkeeping requirements for sellers of viatical settlement investments.
History.s. 2, ch. 2005-237; s. 3, ch. 2009-242; s. 2, ch. 2023-205; s. 21, ch. 2024-168.

F.S. 517.072 on Google Scholar

F.S. 517.072 on Casetext

Amendments to 517.072


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 517.072
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 517.072.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 517.072

Total Results: 3

Walker v. Willis

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1916-07-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 72 Fla. 119, 72 So. 517

Snippet: Administratrix, in Error 26 July 1916 72 So. 517, 72 Fla. 119 Shackleford, J., dissents., Sanders &

Pate v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1916-07-25T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 72 Fla. 97, 72 So. 517

Snippet: Florida, in Error Ellis 25 July 1916 72 So. 517, 72 Fla. 97 Mathis, Price & Weeks> for Plaintiffs

Myers v. Hodges

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1907-01-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 53 Fla. 197

Snippet: Am. Rep. 598; Crockett v. McLanahan, 109 Tenn. 517, 72 S. W. Rep. 950; Cooley v. Galyon, 109 Tenn. 1,