Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 538.04 (2025)
Recordkeeping requirements; penalties.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
538.04 Recordkeeping requirements; penalties.—
(1) A secondhand dealer shall complete a secondhand dealers transaction form at the time of the actual transaction. A secondhand dealer shall maintain a copy of a completed transaction form on the registered premises for at least 1 year after the date of the transaction. However, the secondhand dealer shall maintain a copy of the transaction form for not less than 3 years. Unless other arrangements are agreed upon by the secondhand dealer and the appropriate law enforcement official, the secondhand dealer shall, within 24 hours after acquiring any secondhand goods, deliver to such official a record of the transaction on a form approved by the Department of Law Enforcement. Such record shall contain:
(a) The time, date, and place of the transaction.
(b) A complete and accurate description of the goods acquired, including the following information, if applicable:
1. Brand name.
2. Model number.
3. Manufacturer’s serial number.
4. Size.
5. Color, as apparent to the untrained eye.
6. Precious metal type, weight, and content if known.
7. Gemstone description, including the number of stones, if applicable.
8. In the case of firearms, the type of action, caliber or gauge, number of barrels, barrel length, and finish.
9. Any other unique identifying marks, numbers, or letters.
(c) Digital photographs of the goods, clearly showing the items required to be included on the record as provided in paragraph (b).
(d) A description of the person from whom the goods were acquired, including:
1. Full name, current residential address, workplace, and home and work phone numbers.
2. Height, weight, date of birth, race, gender, hair color, eye color, and any other identifying marks.
3. The right thumbprint, free of smudges and smears, of the person from whom the goods were acquired.
(e) Any other information required by the form approved by the Department of Law Enforcement.
(2) The secondhand dealer shall require verification of the identification by the exhibition of a government-issued photographic identification card such as a driver license or military identification card. The record shall contain the type of identification exhibited, the issuing agency, and the number thereon.
(3) The seller shall sign a statement verifying that the seller is the rightful owner of the goods or is entitled to sell, consign, or trade the goods.
(4) Any person who knowingly gives false verification of ownership or who gives a false or altered identification, and who receives money from a secondhand dealer for goods sold, consigned, or traded commits:
(5) Secondhand dealers are exempt from the provisions of this section for all transactions involving secondhand sports equipment except secondhand sports equipment that is permanently labeled with a serial number.
(6) If the appropriate law enforcement official supplies a secondhand dealer with appropriate software and the secondhand dealer has computer capability, the secondhand dealer must electronically transmit secondhand dealer transactions required by this section to such official. If a secondhand dealer does not have computer capability, the appropriate law enforcement official may provide the secondhand dealer with a computer and all equipment necessary to electronically transmit secondhand dealer transactions. The appropriate law enforcement official shall retain ownership of the computer, unless otherwise agreed upon, and the secondhand dealer shall maintain the computer in good working order, except for ordinary wear. A secondhand dealer who transmits secondhand dealer transactions electronically is not required to also deliver the original or paper copies of the secondhand transaction forms to the appropriate law enforcement official. However, such official may, for purposes of a criminal investigation, request the secondhand dealer to deliver the original transaction form that was electronically transmitted. The secondhand dealer shall deliver the form to the appropriate law enforcement official within 24 hours after receipt of the request.
(7) If the original transaction form is lost or destroyed by the appropriate law enforcement official, a copy may be used by the secondhand dealer as evidence in court. When an electronic image of a customer’s identification is accepted for a transaction, the secondhand dealer must maintain the electronic image in order to meet the recordkeeping requirements applicable to the original transaction form. If a criminal investigation occurs, the secondhand dealer shall, upon request, provide a clear and legible copy of the image to the appropriate law enforcement official.
(8) When secondhand goods are purchased by means of an automated kiosk, the serial number reported pursuant to this section may be the International Mobile Station Equipment Identity (IMEI), the mobile equipment identifier (MEID), or another unique identifying number assigned to the device by the manufacturer. If the IMEI, MEID, or other unique identifying number is not available at the time of receipt or purchase, the report filed pursuant to this section must be updated with the IMEI, MEID, or other unique identifying number as soon as possible, but no later than 10 business days after the date of acquisition. If such identifying numbers are not available at the time of the transaction, the business shall assign another unique identifier to the item which directly associates the item to the transaction that it was purchased in. Upon entering or updating any information on the transaction form, a law enforcement official, as designated by the sheriff or the chief of police of the jurisdiction in which the item was purchased, must be timely notified in writing or by electronic means, as required by the sheriff or chief of police of the jurisdiction. If, upon receiving the device and correcting the missing information, the company finds that the item was misappropriated or stolen, the appropriate law enforcement official must be notified. The holding requirements of ss. 538.06 and 538.09(3) do not begin until all required reports are complete and submitted to the appropriate law enforcement official.
History.—s. 2, ch. 89-533; s. 1, ch. 90-192; s. 2, ch. 90-318; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 2, ch. 98-30; s. 2, ch. 2006-201; s. 2, ch. 2012-179; s. 2, ch. 2016-59.
Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 538.04
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§538.04(4a)FRAUD-IMPERSONPENALTY INCREASED. SEE REC# 6125
§538.04(4a)FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENTFALSE VERIF OWNERSHIP 2NDHAND DEALER LT 0
§538.04(4a)FRAUD-IMPERSONPRESENT FALSE ID TO 2NDHAND DEALER LT 0
§538.04(4a)FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENTPENALTY INCREASED. SEE REC# 6126
§538.04(4a)PASS FORGEDPENALTY INCREASED. SEE REC# 6124
§538.04(4a)PASS FORGEDPRESENT ALTERED ID TO 2NDHAND DEALER LT 0
§538.04(4b)PASS FORGEDPENALTY INCREASED. SEE REC# 6127
§538.04(4b)FRAUD-IMPERSONPENALTY INCREASED. SEE REC# 6128
§538.04(4b)FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENTPENALTY INCREASED. SEE REC# 6129
§538.04(4b)PASS FORGEDPRESENT ALTERED ID SECONDHAND DEALER 0+
§538.04(4b)FRAUD-IMPERSONPRESENT FALSE ID SECONDHAND DEALER 0+
§538.04(4b)FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENTFALSE VERIFICATION OWNERSHIP 2NDHAND DLR 0+
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1993–2019 · leading case: Haugabrook v. State, 827 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
Haugabrook v. State, 827 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). “As to the final charge, obtaining money from a second-hand dealer by fraud in violation of section 538.04, Florida Statutes (1999), we hold that there was substantial, competent evidence to sustain that conviction.”
State v. Hodges, 614 So. 2d 653 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). “Hodges was charged with violating the record keeping requirements of section 538.04, Florida Statutes. His defense was that his business was a "flea market" and, therefore, exempted from such requirements by the provisions of section 538.”
Bailey v. State, 637 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). “The appellant claims that section 538.04, Florida Statutes (1989) [2] was violated by use of his thumbprint from the pawn forms to identify him where there was no issue of probable cause that the gun he pawned was stolen.”
David Rincon v. State of Florida, 264 So. 3d 956 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019). “” § 538.04(1)(d), and (3), Fla. Stat. Here, there was no testimony that the appellant claimed to be the owner of the property.”
Delisser v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). “However, the judgment and order of probation reflect a conviction for false verification of ownership to a secondhand dealer in violation of section 538.04(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2014).”
Delisser v. State, 209 So. 3d 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). “However, the judgment and order of probation reflect a conviction for false verification of ownership to a secondhand dealer in violation of section 538.04(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2014).”
United States v. Mento, 635 F. App'x 854 (11th Cir. 2016). “See Fla. Stat. § 538.04 (4). A preponderance of the evidence demonstrated that Mentó committed both of these offenses.”
Zeigler v. State, 714 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). “525(3), Florida Statutes (1995) and the offense of falsely verifying ownership, and receiving money for goods pledged or sold, in violation of section 538.04(4)(b), was one and the same — appellant’s signing a form at a pawn shop in which he declared ownership of the property he…”
— 538.04(1)(d) — 1 case
David Rincon v. State of Florida, 264 So. 3d 956 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019). “” § 538.04(1)(d), and (3), Fla. Stat. Here, there was no testimony that the appellant claimed to be the owner of the property.”
— 538.04(4)(a) — 3 cases
Delisser v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). “However, the judgment and order of probation reflect a conviction for false verification of ownership to a secondhand dealer in violation of section 538.04(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2014).”
David Rincon v. State of Florida, 264 So. 3d 956 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019). “” § 538.04(1)(d), and (3), Fla. Stat. Here, there was no testimony that the appellant claimed to be the owner of the property.”
Delisser v. State, 209 So. 3d 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). “However, the judgment and order of probation reflect a conviction for false verification of ownership to a secondhand dealer in violation of section 538.04(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2014).”
— 538.04(4)(b) — 1 case
Zeigler v. State, 714 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). “525(3), Florida Statutes (1995) and the offense of falsely verifying ownership, and receiving money for goods pledged or sold, in violation of section 538.04(4)(b), was one and the same — appellant’s signing a form at a pawn shop in which he declared ownership of the property he…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.