Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 538.05 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 538.05 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 538.05

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 538
SECONDHAND DEALERS AND SECONDARY METALS RECYCLERS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 538.05
538.05 Inspection of records and premises of secondhand dealers.—
(1) The entire registered premises and required records of each secondhand dealer are subject to inspection during regular business hours by any law enforcement officer having jurisdiction.
(2) The inspection authorized by subsection (1) shall consist of an examination on the registered premises of the inventory and required records to determine whether the records and inventory are being maintained on the registered premises as required by s. 538.04 and whether the holding period required by s. 538.06 is being complied with.
History.—s. 2, ch. 89-533; s. 1, ch. 90-192; s. 3, ch. 90-318; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 2, ch. 93-97; s. 3, ch. 2006-201.

F.S. 538.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 538.05 on Casetext

Amendments to 538.05


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 538.05
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 538.05.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 538.05

Total Results: 4

MARIA MESA v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-03-01

Snippet: abuse of discretion. Id. at 538. 5 that the witness has personal

J.M. v. Gargett

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-10-04

Citation: 101 So. 3d 352, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 611, 2012 WL 4666695, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 1925

Snippet: of confinement for each offense.” 975 So.2d at 538.5 Moreover, the interpretation of the statute adopted

Rivera v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-09-11

Citation: 859 So. 2d 495

Snippet: requirements of law was impaired. Rivera, 561 So.2d at 538.[5] The record also reflects that Dr. Ceros-Livingston's

Camp Phosphate Co. v. Anderson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1904-06-15

Citation: 48 Fla. 226

Snippet: 84 Pa. St. 238; Christy’s Appeal, 110 Pa. St. 538, 5 Atl. Rep. 205; Appeal of Wistar, 115 Pa. St. 241