Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 560.116 (2025)
Civil immunity.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
560.116 Civil immunity.—Any person having reason to believe that a provision of this chapter is being violated, has been violated, or is about to be violated, may file a complaint with the office setting forth the details of the alleged violation. Such person is immune from civil liability unless the information provided is false and has been provided with reckless disregard for the truth.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2015–2025 · leading case: Steven J. Pincus v. Am. Traffic Solutions, Inc., 986 F.3d 1305 (11th Cir. 2021).
Steven J. Pincus v. Am. Traffic Solutions, Inc., 986 F.3d 1305 (11th Cir. 2021). “See Fla. Stat. § 560.116 (providing that “[a]ny person having reason to believe that a provision of this chapter is being violated, has been violated, or is about to be violated, may file a complaint with the [Financial Services Commission’s Office of Financial Regulation]”).”
Cross v. Point & Pay, LLC, 274 F. Supp. 3d 1289 (M.D. Fla. 2017). “113 (3); see also Fla. Stat. § 560.116 (“Any person having reason to believe that a provision of this chapter is being violated, has been violated, or is about to be violated, may file a complaint with the office setting forth the details of the alleged violation.”
Hucke v. Kubra Data Transfer Ltd., 160 F. Supp. 3d 1320 (S.D. Fla. 2015). “113 (3) (emphasis added); see also Fla. Stat. § 560.116 (“Any person having reason to believe that a provision of this chapter is being violated, has been violated, or is about to be violated, may file a complaint with the office setting forth the details of the alleged…”
Kevin Vericker v. Norman Christopher Powell (Fla. 2025). “(2024) (law enforcement immunity); § 560.116, Fla. Stat. (2024) (money services business immunity); § 631.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.