Florida Statute 570.33 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 570
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 570.33

570.33 Director; qualifications; duties.—

(1) The director of the Division of Plant Industry shall be appointed by the commissioner and shall serve at the commissioner’s pleasure.

(2) The director shall be responsible for protecting the plant industry of the state, and shall, under the direction of the commissioner, direct, coordinate, and enforce the activities described in this chapter, in chapters 581 and 586, and in other chapters and applicable rules.

History.—s. 1, ch. 59-54; ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 70-389; s. 1, ch. 70-439; s. 2, ch. 79-127; s. 18, ch. 92-291; s. 18, ch. 93-169.

F.S. 570.33 on Google Scholar

F.S. 570.33 on Casetext

Amendments to 570.33

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 570.33

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 570.33.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 570.33

Total Results: 9

In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-03-09

Citation: 83 So. 3d 597, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 181, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 507, 2012 WL 753122

Snippet: (2002) (invalid); Hartung v. Bradbury, 332 Or. 570, 33 P.3d 972 (2001) (invalid); Holt v. 2011 Legislative

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. DeLoach

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-08-21

Citation: 603 So. 2d 702, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9181, 1992 WL 201060

Snippet: given; “that claimant’s average weekly wage was $570.33 ..., plus the value of group insurance which [has

Handley v. Anclote Manor Foundation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-10-15

Citation: 253 So. 2d 501

Snippet: Missouri, K. & T.R. Co. v. Wulf, 1913, 226 U.S. 570, 33 S.Ct. 135, 57 L.Ed. 355; Williams v. United States

Richardson v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-11-04

Citation: 228 So. 2d 117

Snippet: 15 (1938); and Fla.R.Cr.Pr. 1.510, 1.530 and 1.570, 33 F.S.A.

Puleston v. Alderman

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1941-10-31

Citation: 4 So. 2d 704, 148 Fla. 353, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 895

Snippet: 917; Missouri, K. T. R. Co. v. Wulf,226 U.S. 570, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 135; 3 Ency. L. P. 655. The action

Hambrick v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1920-11-08

Citation: 80 Fla. 672, 86 So. 623

Snippet: offense. 16 C. J. 1322; State v. DeHart, 109 Ia. 570, 33 South. Rep. 605; Johnson v. State, 106 Miss. 94

Gibbs v. McCoy

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1915-11-02

Citation: 70 Fla. 245, 70 So. 86

Snippet: 917; Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. Wulf, 226 U. S. 570, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 135; 3 Ency. L. & P. 655. The action

Phifer v. Abbott

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1915-02-16

Citation: 69 Fla. 162, 67 So. 917

Snippet: See Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. Wulf, 226 U. S. 570, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 135. The order is affirmed. Taylor

Flanders v. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1914-12-09

Citation: 68 Fla. 479, 67 So. 68

Snippet: (see Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. Wulf, 226 U. S. 570, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 135) ; and as it is clear that under