Cases from cite.case.law:

LOPEZ, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE,, 139 So. 3d 402 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Lopez’s claim for attorney’s fees, contending that because the policy was issued in Texas, section 627.401 . . . However, section 627.401(2) provides: No provision of this part of this chapter applies to: (2) Policies . . . Notwithstanding the unambiguous language of section 627.401(2), Lopez nonetheless seeks to avail himself . . . of Florida law is not warranted under the instant facts and based on the plain language of section 627.401 . . . Lopez alternatively maintains that if section 627.401 prevents recovery of attorney’s fees under section . . .

NATIONAL TRUST INSURANCE COMPANY, v. GRAHAM BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. LLP,, 916 F. Supp. 2d 1244 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . Indeed, Section 627.401(2), Florida Statutes, specifically provides that “No provision of this part of . . . Accordingly, Section 627.401(2) removes the Policy from the requirements of the Claims Administration . . . Co., 504 So.2d 776, 778 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (“[Section 627.401(2) ... limits the applicability of [Section . . .

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. SALGADO,, 22 So. 3d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Part II of Chapter 627, sections 627.401-627.442, is entitled “The Insurance Contract” and lays out the . . . , and 627.428. (5) Credit life or credit disability insurance, except ss. 627.419(5) and 627.428. § 627.401 . . . Part II, Chapter 627, it would have included that type of insurance in the list enumerated in section 627.401 . . . In this case, the express language of section 627.401 directly refutes Saiga-do’s position that United . . .

ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, v. ZOTA,, 985 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 2008)

. . . .” §§ 627.021 (emphasis supplied), 627.401, 627.451, 627.501, 627.601, 627.676, 627.801, 627.911, 627.9403 . . . Section 627.401, Florida Statutes, the "scope of this part" provision for part II of chapter 627, does . . . See §§ 627.401-627.4302, Fla. Stat. (2003) (part II of chapter 627); but see § 627.4085, Fla. . . .

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. FRANKEL ENTERPRISES, INC. a C. B., 509 F. Supp. 2d 1303 (S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . Section 627.401(2) excepts policies not issued or delivered in Florida. . . . One of the provisions of Part II is section 627.401(2), which limits the applicability of that section . . .

ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, v. ZOTA, R. A. Co., 466 F.3d 981 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . They cite Florida Statute § 627.401 in support of their position. . . . Stat. § 627.401. . . . did apply to the whole chapter there would be no need for the legislature to include reinsurance in § 627.401 . . . to the entire chapter, it would not have included “Reinsurance” under both sections §§ 627.[021] and 627.401 . . . to apply to the entire chapter, the legislature would only have excluded joint reinsurance under § 627.401 . . .

ROYAL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, v. COACHMEN INDUSTRIES, INC., 229 F.R.D. 695 (M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . Nevertheless, section 627.401(2) plainly limits the subject provision’s scope to cases where the insurance . . .

TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, v. ROYAL OAK ENTERPRISES, INC. a, 359 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . Section 627.401(2) states that the provisions of Part II of chapter 627, which includes § 627.428(1), . . .

PRIME INSURANCE SYNDICATE, INC. v. B. J. HANDLEY TRUCKING, INC. d. b. a., 363 F.3d 1089 (11th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 627.401(2), however, provides a safe harbor for insurance contracts not delivered in Florida nor . . . Stat. § 627.401(2) removes this insurance policy from the coverage of the casualty insur-anee provision . . . [S]ection 627.401(2) . . . limits the applicability of that section to policies issued for delivery or . . . Stat. § 627.401(2) and is outside the coverage of Fla. . . . Stat. § 627.401(2). . . . .

L. MATHASON, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS,, 855 So. 2d 261 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . It relied on section 627.401(2), Florida Statutes (1999), which provides that no provision of this part . . .

UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a v. A. MURRAY, C. C. J. a, 671 So. 2d 812 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . . & G. counters that section 627.401(2), Florida Statutes (1993) precludes any application of section . . . As to U.S.F. & G.’s reliance on section 627.401(2) precluding attorney’s fees, that position might have . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, v. VEREX ASSURANCE, INC., 645 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 1994)

. . . is among the types of insurance that are excluded from the scope of chapter 627, Part II by section 627.401 . . . Specifically, section 627.401 [] defines the scope of Chapter 627, Part II, which contains § 627.409, . . . apply to mortgage guaranty insurance prior to the enactment of § 635.091 would effectively rewrite § 627.401 . . . Fla.Stat. § 627.401 (1983), titled "Scope of this part,” provides: No provision of this part of this . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, a v. VEREX ASSURANCE, INC., 3 F.3d 391 (11th Cir. 1993)

. . . Specifically, section 627.401 defines the scope of Chapter 627, Part II, which contains § 627.409, by . . . apply to mortgage guaranty insurance prior to the enactment of § 635.091 would effectively rewrite § 627.401 . . . Fla.Stat. § 627.401 (1983), titled "Scope of this part,” provides: No provision of this part of this . . .

PERKINS, v. A. PERKINS DRYWALL A. PERKINS DRYWALL, v. CIGNA PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES,, 615 So. 2d 187 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Section 627.401, Florida Statutes (1989), provides: Scope of this part. — No provision of this part of . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, a v. VEREX ASSURANCE, INC., 795 F. Supp. 404 (S.D. Fla. 1992)

. . . For example, section 627.401, titled “Scope of this part,” lists the types of insurance which are not . . . This holding is supported by several factors: First, section 627.401 did not expressly include mortgage . . .

WINDWARD TRADERS, LTD. a v. FRED S. JAMES COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. P. W. WINDWARD TRADERS, LTD. a v. FRED S. JAMES COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. P. W., 855 F.2d 814 (11th Cir. 1988)

. . . American Centennial points out that § 627.401(2) of the Florida Insurance Code states that the provisions . . . Consequently, with respect to the application of § 627.401(2), which limits the application of the Florida . . . attorney fee statute applies only to policies issued for delivery or delivered in Florida, pursuant to § 627.401 . . .

APERM OF FLORIDA, INC. v. TRANS- COASTAL MAINTENANCE COMPANY, a, 505 So. 2d 459 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Appellants point out that the following provision of section 627.401 governs part II of chapter 627, . . .

SHEEHAN, v. LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, L. M., 504 So. 2d 776 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Section 627.401, Florida Statutes (1983), provides, in part: 627.401 Scope of this part — No provision . . . but argue that section 627.-726 fits within the “except as otherwise provided” language of Section 627.401 . . . One of the provisions of Part II is section 627.401(2), which limits the applicability of that section . . .

WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, Jr. Co- D. v. MANUFACTURERS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 749 F.2d 694 (11th Cir. 1985)

. . . . § 627.401. Delivery has been defined as “actual physical delivery.” Celanese Coatings Co. v. . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. M. DAVELLA,, 450 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . See, Sections 627.401 and 627.727, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

EAST COAST INSURANCE COMPANY, v. F. COOPER I., 415 So. 2d 1323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Section 627.401 states in pertinent part: No provision of part II of this chapter shall apply as to: . . .

MONOGRAM PRODUCTS, INC. a v. L. BERKOWITZ, d b a J. L., 392 So. 2d 1353 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Insurance §§ 337 38 (1971); see § 627.401, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

MORRISON GRAIN COMPANY, INC. a v. UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 632 F.2d 424 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . Kearney in Tampa, Florida (446 F.Supp. at 417), which is sufficient to satisfy the requirement of Section 627.401 . . . Florida Statute (1977) provides in pertinent part: PART II THE INSURANCE CONTRACT ****** 627.401 Scope . . .

OLD REPUBLIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. M. RUCKS,, 363 So. 2d 608 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . The appellant claims that under Section 627.401(2), Florida Statutes (1975), attorney’s fees are not . . . Section 627.401(2) provides that the statute authorizing the recovery of attorney’s fees, Section 627.428 . . . However, Section 627.401(5) states that the only provision of Part II of Chapter 627 [which includes . . .

BLUE CROSS OF FLORIDA, INC. v. L. TURNER,, 363 So. 2d 133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Blue Cross claims that an award of attorney’s fees was precluded by § 627.401(2) because that subsection . . . erroneous, and consequently § 627.428, allowing attorney’s fees did not apply to this case under § 627.401 . . . He notes that § 627.401(2) does not require that the policy or contract be delivered to the insured in . . . Therefore he contends that § 627.401(2) does not restrict the applicability of the attorney’s fee statute . . . The Florida Supreme Court construed § 627.401(2) in Pan-American Life Insurance Company v. . . .

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. S. SIEVERT,, 361 So. 2d 747 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . (See F.S. 627.401) The provision for $9,000.00 fees is therefore deleted from the Final Judgment. . . .

EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF UNITED STATES, a v. J., 551 F.2d 978 (5th Cir. 1977)

. . . . § 627.401 (1972). . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 627.401 (1972) provides in pertinent part: “627.401 Scope of part II. — No provision . . .

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. I. SMITH,, 345 So. 2d 784 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . 1), Florida Statutes (1975), provides for an attorney’s fee in certain insurance cases, but Section 627.401 . . .

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, v. A. C. GROUNDS,, 311 So. 2d 164 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . . § 627.401, Florida Statutes, provides in part as follows: “627.401 Scope of Part II. . . .

JOHNSON, v. AUTO- OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY,, 289 So. 2d 748 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . . § 627.401(2), F.S.A. . . .

CLEMENTS v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., 40 Fla. Supp. 121 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1973)

. . . contends that Florida Statute §627.428 is not applicable to this case by reason of Florida Statute §627.401 . . .