Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 672.102 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 672.102 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 672.102 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 672.102

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS
Chapter 672
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE: SALES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 672.102
672.102 Scope; certain security and other transactions excluded from this chapter.
(1) Unless the context otherwise requires, and except as provided in subsection (2), this chapter applies to transactions in goods and, in the case of a hybrid transaction:
(a) If the sale-of-goods aspects do not predominate, only those provisions of this chapter which relate primarily to the sale-of-goods aspects of the transaction apply, and those provisions that relate primarily to the transaction as a whole do not apply.
(b) If the sale-of-goods aspects predominate, this chapter applies to the transaction but does not preclude application in appropriate circumstances of other law to aspects of the transaction which do not relate to the sale of goods.
(2) This chapter does not do the following:
(a) Apply to a transaction that, even though in the form of an unconditional contract to sell or present sale, operates only to create a security interest.
(b) Impair or repeal a statute regulating sales to consumers, farmers, or other specified classes of buyers.
History.s. 1, ch. 65-254; s. 40, ch. 2025-92.
Note.s. 2-102, U.C.C.

F.S. 672.102 on Google Scholar

F.S. 672.102 on CourtListener

Amendments to 672.102


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 672.102

Total Results: 13

Sellers v. Frank Griffin AMC Jeep, Inc.

526 So. 2d 147, 1988 WL 50148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1988 | Docket: 2180729

Cited 21 times | Published

"transaction in goods" within the meaning of section 672.102; that appellants assumed their new vehicle

Suntogs of Miami, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp.

433 So. 2d 581, 36 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 557

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 1983 | Docket: 1727507

Cited 9 times | Published

thus is governed by the Uniform Commercial Code. § 672.102, Fla. Stat. *584 (1975). The Code provides: "[W]hen

Armadillo Distribution Enterprises, Inc. v. Hai Yun Musical Instruments Manufacture Co.

142 F. Supp. 3d 1245, 93 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 40, 88 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 41, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150398, 2015 WL 6750813

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2015 | Docket: 64305140

Cited 7 times | Published

of the Uniform Commercial Code. See Fla. Stat, § 672.102 (defining the scope of Florida’s U.C.C.); Fla

Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Galaxis USA, Ltd.

222 F. Supp. 2d 1315, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17836, 2002 WL 31103982

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2002 | Docket: 2152263

Cited 7 times | Published

Commercial Code ("the Code") applies. See Fla. Stat. § 672.102 (2001). Where a sales contract contains several

Validsa, Inc. v. PDVSA Services Inc.

632 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59162, 2009 WL 2029958

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2009 | Docket: 2113520

Cited 4 times | Published

("UCC") as adopted in Florida. See Fla. Stat. § 672.102. Specifically, Plaintiff cites to Fla. Stat. §

Excess Risk Underwriters, Inc. v. Lafayette Life Insurance

328 F. Supp. 2d 1319, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11218, 2004 WL 1381203

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 3, 2004 | Docket: 2311079

Cited 3 times | Published

contract for the sale of goods. See Fla. Stat. § 672.102 (2004) (stating that the UCC's Article 2 only

Capital Associates, Inc. v. Hudgens

455 So. 2d 651, 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 66

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1984 | Docket: 1317087

Cited 3 times | Published

Article does not expressly apply to leases. Section 672.102, Florida Statutes (1983), provides that "[u]nless

Allied Shelving & Equipment, Inc. v. National Deli, LLC

154 So. 3d 482, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 136, 2015 WL 72487

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2015 | Docket: 2621526

Cited 2 times | Published

only to transactions in goods, see § 672.102, Fla. Stat. (2011); it does not apply to contracts

American Zurich Insurance Co. v. St. George Crystal, Ltd.

870 So. 2d 243, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3882, 2004 WL 592426

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2004 | Docket: 64829658

Cited 1 times | Published

Statutes, applies to all transactions in goods. § 672.102. Viewed in the light most favorable to American

General Tool Industries, Inc. v. Premier Machinery, Inc.

790 So. 2d 449, 44 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 718, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5176, 2001 WL 388062

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2001 | Docket: 64807090

Cited 1 times | Published

(UCC), Chapter 672, Florida Statutes (2000). § 672.102, Fla. Stat. (2000) (“[Chapter 672, Florida Statutes

Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. M/Y Beowulf

883 F. Supp. 2d 1199, 2012 WL 2064570, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79138

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2012 | Docket: 65984035

Published

Statutes, applies to all transactions in goods. § 672.102, Florida Statutes. Because the Sculley 60' meets

Birwelco-Montenay, Inc. v. Infilco Degremont, Inc.

827 So. 2d 255, 2001 WL 1230557

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2002 | Docket: 1365663

Published

reversed. The UCC applies to transactions in goods, § 672.102, Fla. Stat. (1993), but not services. The panel

In Re Edgerton

186 B.R. 143, 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 1275, 1995 WL 534616

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1995 | Docket: 1111749

Published

[2] Fla.Stat. § 671.101 (1992). [3] Fla.Stat. § 672.102 (1965). [4] Fla.Stat. § 672.105(1) (1965). [5]