Florida Statute 684.0002 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIX
COMMERCIAL RELATIONS

Chapter 684
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 684.0002

684.0002 Scope of application.—

(1) This chapter applies to international commercial arbitration, subject to any agreement in force between the United States of America and any other country or countries.

(2) This chapter, except ss. 684.0009, 684.001, 684.0026, 684.0027, 684.0028, 684.0047, and 684.0048, applies only if the place of arbitration is in this state.

(3) An arbitration is international if:

(a) The parties to an arbitration agreement have, at the time of the conclusion of that agreement, their places of business in different countries; or

(b) One of the following places is situated outside the country in which the parties have their places of business:

1. The place of arbitration if determined in, or pursuant to, the arbitration agreement; or

2. Any place where a substantial part of the obligations of the commercial relationship are to be performed or the place with which the subject matter of the dispute is most closely connected; or

(c) The parties have expressly agreed that the subject matter of the arbitration agreement relates to more than one country.

(4) For the purposes of subsection (3):

(a) If a party has more than one place of business, the place of business is that which has the closest relationship to the arbitration agreement.

(b) If a party does not have a place of business, reference shall be made to his or her habitual residence.

(5) This chapter does not affect any law that may prohibit a matter from being resolved by arbitration or that specifies the manner in which a specific matter may be submitted or resolved by arbitration.

History.—s. 3, ch. 2010-60; s. 3, ch. 2013-164.

F.S. 684.0002 on Google Scholar

F.S. 684.0002 on Casetext

Amendments to 684.0002

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 684.0002

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 684.0002.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 684.0002

Total Results: 9

STEPHEN CHARLES FISCHER, as Trustee of the Dorothy L. Fischer Trust v. SUSAN ANN FISCHER, as Co-Trustee, etc. and SANDRA FISCHER FRASER, as Co-Trustee, etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-12-21T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: qualified as an expert. See Thellman, 557 So. 2d at 684. 2 Although the Statewide Uniform Guidelines were

Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. McLeod

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-06-26T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 15 So. 3d 682, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8763, 2009 WL 1811554

Snippet: arising out of international relationships. See 684.02(1). See generally Robert M. Jarvis, International

JP Morgan Chase v. New Millennial, LC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-03-18T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 6 So. 3d 681

Snippet: accordance with § 701.02, Florida Statutes. *684 2. New Millennial is a subsequent purchaser for valuable

Aguilera v. Inservices, Inc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2005-06-16T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 905 So. 2d 84

Snippet: under an objective standard. See 754 So.2d at 684. [2] Judge Shevin in his well-articulated dissent

Cravero v. Florida State Turnpike Authority

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1956-11-15T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 91 So. 2d 312

Snippet: also Shavers v. Duval County, Fla. 1954, 73 So.2d 684; 2 Lewis on Eminent Domain, 3d Ed., Sec. 716, p. 1253

MacQueen v. MacQueen

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1938-02-14T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 179 So. 725, 131 Fla. 448, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1433

Snippet: Gildersleeve v. Gildersleeve, 88 Conn. 689, 92 Atl. Rep. 684; 2 Schouler on Marriage, Divorce, Separation and Domestic

Everglade Cypress Co. v. Tunnicliffe, as Liqdr.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1933-01-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 148 So. 192, 107 Fla. 675

Snippet: the credits of money paid appearing *Page 684 on the two notes held by the Atlantic National Bank represented

Herron v. Passailaigue

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1926-10-27T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 110 So. 539, 92 Fla. 818

Snippet: Gildersleeve v. Gildersleeve,88 Conn. 689, 92 Atl. Rep. 684; 2 Schouler on Marriage, Divorce, Separation and Domestic

Logan v. Slade & Etheredge

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1891-06-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 28 Fla. 699

Snippet: Johns., 344; Bank of Utica vs. Smedes, 3 Cowen, 684; 2 Daniell’s Chancery Pl. & Pr., 1488, et seq.