Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 794.022 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 794.022 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 794.022 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 794.022

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVI
CRIMES
Chapter 794
SEXUAL BATTERY
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 794.022
794.022 Rules of evidence.—
(1) The testimony of the victim need not be corroborated in a prosecution under s. 787.06, s. 794.011, or s. 800.04.
(2) Specific instances of prior consensual sexual activity between the victim and any person other than the offender may not be admitted into evidence in a prosecution under s. 787.06, s. 794.011, or s. 800.04. However, such evidence may be admitted if it is first established to the court in a proceeding in camera that such evidence may prove that the defendant was not the source of the semen, pregnancy, injury, or disease; or, when consent by the victim is at issue, such evidence may be admitted if it is first established to the court in a proceeding in camera that such evidence tends to establish a pattern of conduct or behavior on the part of the victim which is so similar to the conduct or behavior in the case that it is relevant to the issue of consent.
(3) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reputation evidence relating to a victim’s prior sexual conduct or evidence presented for the purpose of showing that manner of dress of the victim at the time of the offense incited the sexual battery may not be admitted into evidence in a prosecution under s. 787.06, s. 794.011, or s. 800.04.
(4) When consent of the victim is a defense to prosecution under s. 787.06, s. 794.011, or s. 800.04, evidence of the victim’s mental incapacity or defect is admissible to prove that the consent was not intelligent, knowing, or voluntary; and the court shall instruct the jury accordingly.
(5) An offender’s use of a prophylactic device, or a victim’s request that an offender use a prophylactic device, is not, by itself, relevant to either the issue of whether or not the offense was committed or the issue of whether or not the victim consented.
History.—s. 2, ch. 74-121; s. 237, ch. 77-104; s. 1, ch. 83-258; s. 1, ch. 90-40; s. 5, ch. 90-174; s. 25, ch. 93-156; s. 1, ch. 94-80; s. 5, ch. 2016-199.

F.S. 794.022 on Google Scholar

F.S. 794.022 on CourtListener

Amendments to 794.022


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 794.022

Total Results: 84

Tibbs v. State

397 So. 2d 1120

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1981 | Docket: 2461324

Cited 429 times | Published

requirement for a sexual battery conviction. § 794.022(1), Fla. Stat. (1979). A majority of states has

Rankin v. Evans

133 F.3d 1425, 39 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1139, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 1256, 1998 WL 31750

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 29, 1998 | Docket: 2036288

Cited 247 times | Published

law. 26 .We note that under Fla. Stat. 794.022(1) (West Supp.1990), "[t]he testimony of

Rankin v. Evans

133 F.3d 1425

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 29, 1998 | Docket: 422182

Cited 131 times | Published

of law. 26 We note that under Fla. Stat. 794.022(1) (West Supp. 1990), “[t]he testimony of

Richard Marx, Individually, and Kristina Marx, a Minor v. Glenn H. Gumbinner, Robert Timmann and Kelly Vaughn, Martin County Sheriff's Dept.

905 F.2d 1503, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 11747, 1990 WL 86391

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 13, 1990 | Docket: 2125590

Cited 129 times | Published

in a prosecution under s. 794.011.” Fla.Stat. § 794.022(1) (West Supp.1990). See also Myers,

Roberts v. State

510 So. 2d 885, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 325

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1987 | Docket: 1593209

Cited 76 times | Published

the parameters of Florida's Rape Shield Law, section 794.022, Florida Statutes, which provides in pertinent

Lewis v. State

591 So. 2d 922, 1991 WL 256876

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 1991 | Docket: 887196

Cited 29 times | Published

of a victim's prior sexual activity under section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (1987), Florida's Rape

Robinson v. State

462 So. 2d 471, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 236

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1984 | Docket: 53080

Cited 25 times | Published

Thomas v. State, 167 So.2d 309 (Fla. 1964); see § 794.022, Fla. Stat.(1981). But cf. Huggins v. State, 453

Audano v. State

641 So. 2d 1356, 1994 WL 440449

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 1994 | Docket: 1648624

Cited 21 times | Published

intercourse with persons other than the defendant. § 794.022(2), Fla. Stat. (1993); McGriff v. State, 601 So

Marr v. State

494 So. 2d 1139, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 499

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1986 | Docket: 452446

Cited 19 times | Published

ruled that these questions were barred by section 794.022(2),[1] and held that this section did not unconstitutionally

McElveen v. State

415 So. 2d 746

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1982 | Docket: 1512917

Cited 19 times | Published

to the issue of consent in accordance with Section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (1979). The defense's

Kaplan v. State

451 So. 2d 1386

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1984 | Docket: 1741092

Cited 18 times | Published

not constitute a pattern of similar conduct. Section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (1983), provides in pertinent

Brown v. State

11 So. 3d 428, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5871, 2009 WL 1424047

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2009 | Docket: 1656842

Cited 12 times | Published

in instructing the jury in accordance with section 794.022(1) that the testimony of the victim need not

Roberts v. Singletary

794 F. Supp. 1106, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8437, 1992 WL 130851

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1992 | Docket: 959812

Cited 12 times | Published

application of Florida's Rape Shield Law, Fla.Stat.Ann. § 794.022[1], denied him his Fifth and Sixth Amendment Rights

Docekal v. State

929 So. 2d 1139, 2006 WL 1501082

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 2006 | Docket: 1726891

Cited 11 times | Published

trial. [1] Florida's Rape Shield statute, section 794.022, Florida Statutes (2005), prohibits introduction

State v. Coe

521 So. 2d 373, 1988 WL 20077

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1988 | Docket: 1347711

Cited 11 times | Published

lewdness and indecent exposure. [2] We note that section 794.022(1), Florida Statutes (1987), provides that

Hodges v. State

386 So. 2d 888

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 1980 | Docket: 476990

Cited 11 times | Published

consensual sexual activity by the victim, under Section 794.022, Florida Statutes; no reversible error in the

McLean v. State

754 So. 2d 176, 2000 WL 345774

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2000 | Docket: 431309

Cited 10 times | Published

conclude this was error. The Rape Shield Statute, section 794.022, Florida Statutes (1995), prohibits evidence

Carlyle v. State

945 So. 2d 540, 2006 WL 3422085

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2006 | Docket: 1400038

Cited 9 times | Published

evidence in a prosecution under s. 794.011." § 794.022(2), Fla. Stat. (2004). We conclude that the trial

Pendleton v. State

348 So. 2d 1206

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 1977 | Docket: 1760883

Cited 9 times | Published

instruction requested by defendant, pursuant to Section 794.022, Florida Statutes. The trial court did not

Pendleton v. State

348 So. 2d 1206

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 1977 | Docket: 1760883

Cited 9 times | Published

instruction requested by defendant, pursuant to Section 794.022, Florida Statutes. The trial court did not

Robinson v. State

575 So. 2d 699, 1991 WL 14999

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1991 | Docket: 1731123

Cited 8 times | Published

erred in applying Florida's Rape Shield Law, section 794.022, Florida Statutes (1987), precluding him from

Commerford v. State

728 So. 2d 796, 1999 WL 104444

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1999 | Docket: 345021

Cited 7 times | Published

1986). We also note that, notwithstanding section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (1997), a victim's prior

Marr v. State

470 So. 2d 703

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1985 | Docket: 1241540

Cited 7 times | Published

First, that the trial court erred in holding Section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes, constitutional in that

Winters v. State

425 So. 2d 203

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1983 | Docket: 1182211

Cited 7 times | Published

UPCHURCH, Jr., and COWART, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] § 794.022(2), Fla. Stat. (1981): Specific instances of

State v. Camejo

641 So. 2d 109, 1994 WL 94184

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1994 | Docket: 1152343

Cited 6 times | Published

(c) the victim's credibility is at issue. Section 794.022 specifically provides that testimony of a sexual

Padgett v. State

551 So. 2d 1259, 1989 WL 133751

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1989 | Docket: 1525618

Cited 6 times | Published

victim. Accordingly, I dissent. NOTES [1] See § 794.022, Fla. Stat. (1987). [2] Cotita v. State, 381

Deel v. State

481 So. 2d 15, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2574

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1985 | Docket: 548529

Cited 6 times | Published

focuses on the definition of "injury" under section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (1983), which provides

McGriff v. State

601 So. 2d 1320, 1992 WL 157395

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1992 | Docket: 1305370

Cited 5 times | Published

he would object to the specific testimony, section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (1989), would allow evidence

Lewis v. State

570 So. 2d 412, 1990 WL 181557

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1990 | Docket: 472649

Cited 5 times | Published

applicability of Florida's rape shield statute, see § 794.022, Fla. Stat. (1987), to prosecutions for violations

Vizzi v. State

501 So. 2d 613, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2316

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1986 | Docket: 538624

Cited 5 times | Published

interpretation of the Rape Victim Shield Statute [§ 794.022, Fla. Stat.(1985)], that Mr. Vizzi was not permitted

Hicks v. State

388 So. 2d 357

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1980 | Docket: 1480814

Cited 5 times | Published

Williamson v. State, 338 So.2d 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); § 794.022(1), Fla. Stat. (1979). The court sentenced appellant

In re Amendments to the Florida Evidence Code

210 So. 3d 1231

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2017 | Docket: 60294194

Cited 4 times | Published

section 316.066 and the rape shield statute in section 794,022 were never within scope of the [C]ommittee’s

Johnson v. Moore

472 F. Supp. 2d 1344, 2007 WL 402907

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2007 | Docket: 2144988

Cited 4 times | Published

with Johnson. This exclusion was based on Section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes, the Florida Rape Shield

Camejo v. State

660 So. 2d 242, 1995 WL 313785

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 25, 1995 | Docket: 1637699

Cited 4 times | Published

(c) the victim's credibility is at issue. Section 794.022 specifically provides that testimony of a sexual

Sadler v. State

509 So. 2d 1139, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1454

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1987 | Docket: 2565890

Cited 4 times | Published

of such rebuttal evidence contravenes both section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (1985) and substantive

Minus v. State

901 So. 2d 344, 2005 WL 1030127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2005 | Docket: 1666218

Cited 3 times | Published

battery is codified in the rape-shield statute, section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (2001). Kaplan v. State

Teemer v. State

615 So. 2d 234, 1993 WL 62234

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1993 | Docket: 1184683

Cited 3 times | Published

of the victim's prior sexual activity under Section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (1991), Florida's Rape

Dixon v. State

605 So. 2d 960, 1992 WL 251009

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1992 | Docket: 1343032

Cited 3 times | Published

and exclusion under the rape shield statute, section 794.022, Florida Statutes. The testimony the defense

Young v. State

562 So. 2d 370, 1990 WL 67320

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1990 | Docket: 1674705

Cited 3 times | Published

that it is relevant to the issue of consent." § 794.022(2), Fla. Stat. (1987). We hold that the proffered

Williams v. State

507 So. 2d 1122, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 911

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1987 | Docket: 460110

Cited 3 times | Published

to rebut the trait; or * * * * * * (NOTE: Section 794.022 deals with prior consensual sexual activity

Baeza v. State

489 So. 2d 36, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 361

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1986 | Docket: 1528830

Cited 3 times | Published

this issue. The court based its ruling on section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (1985) — Florida's rape-shield

Kemp v. State

464 So. 2d 1238

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1985 | Docket: 1661338

Cited 3 times | Published

the proffered testimony on the strength of section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (1981), which provides:

Larry Michael Thorne v. State of Florida

271 So. 3d 177

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 2019 | Docket: 15420921

Cited 2 times | Published

that such evidence was inadmissible under section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes, commonly referred to

Christopher Allen Teachman v. State of Florida

264 So. 3d 242

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 2019 | Docket: 8468158

Cited 2 times | Published

source of semen, pregnancy, injury, or disease. § 794.022, Fla. Stat.; Gomez v. State, 245 So. 3d 950, 953

Rafael Alexander Gutierrez v. State of Florida

177 So. 3d 226, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 359, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 1383, 2015 WL 3887354

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2015 | Docket: 2668463

Cited 2 times | Published

corroboration of the alleged crime, and because section 794.022(1), Florida Statutes (2012), provided that

Esteban v. State

967 So. 2d 1095, 2007 WL 3355402

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 2007 | Docket: 1733645

Cited 2 times | Published

into evidence in a prosecution under s. 794.011. § 794.022, Fla. Stat. (2005). In Marr v. State, 494 So.2d

Gilliam v. State

817 So. 2d 768, 2002 WL 185920

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2002 | Docket: 1430476

Cited 2 times | Published

been admissible under the Rape Shield Law, section 794.022, Florida Statutes (1987).[12] Gilliam's ninth

State v. Adderly

803 So. 2d 760, 2001 WL 1335343

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2001 | Docket: 1784853

Cited 2 times | Published

with her boyfriend should be excluded. See *762 § 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (2001). The trial court denied

Arroyo v. State

252 So. 3d 374

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2018 | Docket: 7567946

Cited 1 times | Published

limine pursuant to the Rape Shield Statute, section 794.022, Florida Statutes (2010), to exclude any reference

In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES-INSTRUCTIONS 7.8, 7.8(A), and 11.1-11.6(A)

190 So. 3d 1055, 2016 WL 1460708

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2016 | Docket: 3053710

Cited 1 times | Published

offender. Give if applicable. § 794.022(4), Fla. Stat. . Evidence of the — victim’s

Anderson v. State

133 So. 3d 646, 2014 WL 996486, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3600

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2014 | Docket: 60238865

Cited 1 times | Published

of the offense incited the sexual battery...." § 794.022(3), Fla. Stat. (2011).

Ware v. State

124 So. 3d 388, 2013 WL 5744445, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16900

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2013 | Docket: 60235471

Cited 1 times | Published

rules and statutes. See, e.g., Fed. R. Evid. 412; § 794.022, Fla. Stat. (2013); Charles W. Eh-rhardt, Evidence

Torres v. State

54 So. 3d 535, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 215, 2011 WL 148322

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2011 | Docket: 60298312

Cited 1 times | Published

Another aspect of this case is that pursuant to section 794.022(3), Florida Statutes (2010), the State was

Dept. of Professional Regulation v. Wise

575 So. 2d 713, 1991 WL 17932

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1991 | Docket: 2539751

Cited 1 times | Published

support of this point is founded upon *715 Section 794.022, Florida Statutes, which is more commonly known

Adkins v. State

448 So. 2d 1096

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 1984 | Docket: 1523128

Cited 1 times | Published

affirming. Both parties appropriately rely upon section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (1981), which provides:

McCray v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2025 | Docket: 71098305

Published

Subsection (2) of the “rape shield” law, section 794.022, Florida Statutes, states in pertinent part:

ANDREW JAMES LYDECKER v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2024 | Docket: 68411312

Published

the victims under the rape shield statute. See § 794.022(2). Mr. Lydecker also argues that the trial court

JOSEPH BLOW vs STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2023 | Docket: 68034173

Published

Chapter 794 governs the crime of sexual battery. Section 794.022, Florida Statutes, sets forth rules of evidence

RAYMOND VINCENT v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 2023 | Docket: 65417104

Published

defendant’s convictions. The rape shield statute, section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (2019), provides:

MARLON TERRANCE MURPHY v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2021 | Docket: 59882185

Published

unduly prejudicial character evidence. See § 794.022(2), Fla. Stat.; § 90.404, Fla. Stat.; § 90.402

GARY TIMOTHY KITCHINGS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2020 | Docket: 16834860

Published

admission of that evidence was precluded by section 794.022, Florida Statutes, Florida’s rape shield law

JAMES AMELIO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

253 So. 3d 1150

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2018 | Docket: 7664432

Published

instructions. The challenged instruction references section 794.022(4), Florida Statutes, and states: “Evidence

CARLOS GOMEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA

245 So. 3d 950

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2018 | Docket: 6375023

Published

employer would violate the rape shield law, section 794.022, Florida Statutes (2013). The court also determined

Dylan Robinson v. State of Florida

241 So. 3d 972

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2018 | Docket: 6355439

Published

precludes this type of evidence to show consent, § 794.022(2), Fla. Stat. (2014), Robinson maintains the

Portillo v. State

211 So. 3d 1135, 2017 WL 697729, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2348

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2017 | Docket: 4608343

Published

argues that the victim’s testimony violated section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (2014), a subsection of

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Evidence Code

210 So. 3d 1231, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 179, 2017 WL 633770, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 338

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2017 | Docket: 4586140

Published

section 316.066 and the rape shield statute in section 794.022 were never within scope of the [C]ommittee’s

In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases – Report No. 2014-03

156 So. 3d 1037, 2015 WL 358011

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2015 | Docket: 2629104

Published

the crime charged. Give if requested. § 794.022, Fla. Stat. (Victim’s) lack of chastity

In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases

156 So. 3d 1037

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2015 | Docket: 60294043

Published

defense to the crime charged. Give if requested. § 794-022, Fla. Stat. (Victim’s) lack of chastity is not

Cooper v. State

137 So. 3d 530, 2014 WL 1301510, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4782

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2014 | Docket: 60240350

Published

prevent such cross-examination based upon section 794.022, Florida Statutes (2008) (commonly referred

Gutierrez v. State

133 So. 3d 1123

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2014 | Docket: 60238691

Published

instruction used the exact statutory language from section 794.022(1), Florida Statutes (2010), and that Gutierrez

Victory v. State

981 So. 2d 1240, 2008 WL 2064670

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2008 | Docket: 2507394

Published

source of the injuries suffered by the victim. Section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (2007), provides that

Victory v. State

981 So. 2d 1240, 2008 WL 2064670

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2008 | Docket: 2507394

Published

source of the injuries suffered by the victim. Section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (2007), provides that

Hogan v. State

908 So. 2d 498, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8897, 2005 WL 1364374

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2005 | Docket: 64839798

Published

it was relevant to the issue of consent. See § 794.022(2), Fla. Stat. (2003). Compare Minus v. State

Strong v. State

853 So. 2d 1095, 2003 WL 21919273

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2003 | Docket: 1189050

Published

have been given. The defense points out that section 794.022, Florida Statutes, is entitled "Rules of Evidence

Saleem v. State

773 So. 2d 89, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12615, 2000 WL 1448514

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2000 | Docket: 64802278

Published

requires no medical or other corroboration. See § 794.022(1), Fla. Stat. (1999); Thomas v. State, 167 So

Rancourt v. State

766 So. 2d 1071, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7176, 2000 WL 762245

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2000 | Docket: 64800296

Published

activity with anyone other than the accused. See § 794.022, Fla. Stat. (1999). Rancourt now argues the testimony

Mitchell v. State

695 So. 2d 810, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5573, 1997 WL 269192

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1997 | Docket: 64774310

Published

fell within an exception to the Rape Shield Law. § 794.022(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). More specifically, the

Delgado v. State

680 So. 2d 1049, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9745, 1996 WL 526222

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1996 | Docket: 64768104

Published

defendant’s cross-examination of the victim. § 794.022, Fla.Stat. (1995). Accordingly, we affirm the

State v. Pancoast

596 So. 2d 162, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3330, 1992 WL 57865

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1992 | Docket: 64666237

Published

Pancoast, the defendant. In accordance with section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (1989), the judge conducted

Castro v. State

591 So. 2d 1076, 1991 WL 276879

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1991 | Docket: 1528115

Published

purportedly under the rape shield statute, section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (1989), extensive proffered

Campbell v. State

553 So. 2d 184, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2095, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5025, 1989 WL 104001

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1989 | Docket: 64646752

Published

witnesses would have been admissible under section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes. We affirm this point

Ortiz v. State

545 So. 2d 926, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2590, 1989 WL 47157

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 1989 | Docket: 64643430

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of section 794.022, Florida Statutes (1987), and Kaplan v. State

Burwick v. State

408 So. 2d 722, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18897

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 1982 | Docket: 64587320

Published

sexual activity by the victim, excluded by Section 794.022(2), Florida Statutes (1979). The question as

Blunt v. State

397 So. 2d 1047, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19800

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1981 | Docket: 64582404

Published

children. This did not meet the requirements of Section 794.-022(2), Florida Statutes (1979). *1048Defendant