Florida Statute 800.05 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVI
CRIMES

Chapter 800
LEWDNESS; INDECENT EXPOSURE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 800.05

800.05 Forfeiture of retirement benefits for a felony defined in s. 800.04.—The retirement benefits of a person convicted of a felony committed on or after October 1, 2008, defined in s. 800.04 are subject to forfeiture in accordance with s. 112.3173 or s. 121.091 if the person is a public officer or employee when the offense occurs; the person commits the offense through the use or attempted use of power, rights, privileges, duties, or position of the person’s public office or employment position; and the victim is younger than 16 years of age when the offense occurs.

History.—s. 6, ch. 2008-108.

F.S. 800.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 800.05 on Casetext

Amendments to 800.05

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 800.05

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 800.05.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 800.05

Total Results: 9

Rivera v. Board of Trustees of the City of Tampa's General Employment Retirement Fund

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-02-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 189 So. 3d 207, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2847, 2016 WL 746480

Snippet: See also § 794.09, Fla. Stat. (2014); § 800.05, Fla. Stat. (2014). The Board had the burden of

Tricam Industries, Inc. v. Coba

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-08-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 100 So. 3d 105, 2012 WL 3733642, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14333

Snippet: attached to their decision. Moorman, 594 So.2d at 799-800.5 I agree. II Even if the waiver point were not correct

Cabrera v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-10-08T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 884 So. 2d 482

Snippet: section 775.21 is not correctable under rule 3.800.[5] Moreover, a designation as a sexual predator simply

Port Largo Club, Inc. v. Warren

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-10-01T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 476 So. 2d 1330

Snippet: loss of bargain damages, respectively, of $6,800 and $5,700. Specific performance was not granted since

Davison v. Feuerherd

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1980-12-30T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 391 So. 2d 799

Snippet: . Davison was the sole or primary beneficiary. *800 5. During the summer and early fall of 1977, Mrs.

Chastain v. Civil Service Board

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1976-02-19T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 327 So. 2d 230

Snippet: prisoner, appellant was also charged with violating § 800-5 of the Orlando Police Department Regulations, which… current department directives referred to in § 800-5 were embodied in General Order No. 73-5 which provided

State v. Jones

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1976-01-13T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 327 So. 2d 18

Snippet: restricted by the sixty-day provision of RCrP 3.800. [5] Negron v. State, 306 So.2d 104 (Fla. 1975); Snowden

White v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1974-07-25T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 299 So. 2d 143, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8812

Snippet: . State, 1945, 155 Fla. 545, 549, 20 So.2d 798, 800 [5-6]; Bass v. State, Fla.App. 1, 1970, 232 So.2d

Haines v. St. Petersburg Methodist Home, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1965-02-18T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 173 So. 2d 176

Snippet: Am.Rep. 424; Smith v. Pond, 90 N.J. Eq. 445, 107 A. 800; 5 Words and Phrases p. 360. In the case here, in