Florida Statute 812.015 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVI
CRIMES

Chapter 812
THEFT, ROBBERY, AND RELATED CRIMES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 812.015

812.015 Retail and farm theft; transit fare evasion; mandatory fine; alternative punishment; detention and arrest; exemption from liability for false arrest; resisting arrest; penalties.—

(1) As used in this section:

(a) “Antishoplifting or inventory control device” means a mechanism or other device designed and operated for the purpose of detecting the removal from a mercantile establishment or similar enclosure, or from a protected area within such an enclosure, of specially marked or tagged merchandise. The term includes any electronic or digital imaging or any video recording or other film used for security purposes and the cash register tape or other record made of the register receipt.

(b) “Antishoplifting or inventory control device countermeasure” means any item or device which is designed, manufactured, modified, or altered to defeat any antishoplifting or inventory control device.

(c) “Farm produce” means livestock or any item grown, produced, or manufactured by a person owning, renting, or leasing land for the purpose of growing, producing, or manufacturing items for sale or personal use, either part time or full time.

(d) “Farm theft” means the unlawful taking possession of any items that are grown or produced on land owned, rented, or leased by another person. The term includes the unlawful taking possession of equipment and associated materials used to grow or produce farm products as defined in s. 823.14(3)(e).

(e) “Farmer” means a person who is engaging in the growing or producing of farm produce, milk products, honey, eggs, or meat, either part time or full time, for personal consumption or for sale and who is the owner or lessee of the land or a person designated in writing by the owner or lessee to act as her or his agent. No person defined as a farm labor contractor pursuant to s. 450.28 shall be designated to act as an agent for purposes of this section.

(f) “Mass transit vehicle” means buses, rail cars, or fixed-guideway mover systems operated by, or under contract to, state agencies, political subdivisions of the state, or municipalities for the transportation of fare-paying passengers.

(g) “Merchandise” means any personal property, capable of manual delivery, displayed, held, or offered for retail sale by a merchant.

(h) “Merchant” means an owner or operator, or the agent, consignee, employee, lessee, or officer of an owner or operator, of any premises or apparatus used for retail purchase or sale of any merchandise.

(i) “Retail theft” means the taking possession of or carrying away of merchandise, property, money, or negotiable documents; altering or removing a label, universal product code, or price tag; transferring merchandise from one container to another; or removing a shopping cart, with intent to deprive the merchant of possession, use, benefit, or full retail value.

(j) “Social media platform” has the same meaning as provided in s. 501.2041(1).

(k) “Transit agency” means any state agency, political subdivision of the state, or municipality which operates mass transit vehicles.

(l) “Transit fare evasion” means the unlawful refusal to pay the appropriate fare for transportation upon a mass transit vehicle, or to evade the payment of such fare, or to enter any mass transit vehicle or facility by any door, passageway, or gate, except as provided for the entry of fare-paying passengers, and shall constitute petit theft as proscribed by this chapter.

(m) “Trespass” means the violation as described in s. 810.08.

(n) “Value of merchandise” means the sale price of the merchandise at the time it was stolen or otherwise removed, depriving the owner of her or his lawful right to ownership and sale of said item.

(2) Upon a second or subsequent conviction for petit theft from a merchant, farmer, or transit agency, the offender shall be punished as provided in s. 812.014(3), except that the court shall impose a fine of not less than $50 or more than $1,000. However, in lieu of such fine, the court may require the offender to perform public services designated by the court. In no event shall any such offender be required to perform fewer than the number of hours of public service necessary to satisfy the fine assessed by the court, as provided by this subsection, at the minimum wage prevailing in the state at the time of sentencing.

(3)(a) A law enforcement officer, a merchant, a farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent, who has probable cause to believe that a retail theft, farm theft, a transit fare evasion, or trespass, or unlawful use or attempted use of any antishoplifting or inventory control device countermeasure, has been committed by a person and, in the case of retail or farm theft, that the property can be recovered by taking the offender into custody may, for the purpose of attempting to effect such recovery or for prosecution, take the offender into custody and detain the offender in a reasonable manner for a reasonable length of time. In the case of a farmer, taking into custody shall be effectuated only on property owned or leased by the farmer. In the event the merchant, merchant’s employee, farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent takes the person into custody, a law enforcement officer shall be called to the scene immediately after the person has been taken into custody.

(b) The activation of an antishoplifting or inventory control device as a result of a person exiting an establishment or a protected area within an establishment shall constitute reasonable cause for the detention of the person so exiting by the owner or operator of the establishment or by an agent or employee of the owner or operator, provided sufficient notice has been posted to advise the patrons that such a device is being utilized. Each such detention shall be made only in a reasonable manner and only for a reasonable period of time sufficient for any inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the activation of the device.

(c) The taking into custody and detention by a law enforcement officer, merchant, merchant’s employee, farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent, if done in compliance with all the requirements of this subsection, shall not render such law enforcement officer, merchant, merchant’s employee, farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent, criminally or civilly liable for false arrest, false imprisonment, or unlawful detention.

(4) Any law enforcement officer may arrest, either on or off the premises and without warrant, any person the officer has probable cause to believe unlawfully possesses, or is unlawfully using or attempting to use or has used or attempted to use, any antishoplifting or inventory control device countermeasure or has committed theft in a retail or wholesale establishment or on commercial or private farm lands of a farmer or transit fare evasion or trespass.

(5)(a) A merchant, merchant’s employee, farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent who takes a person into custody, as provided in subsection (3), or who causes an arrest, as provided in subsection (4), of a person for retail theft, farm theft, transit fare evasion, or trespass shall not be criminally or civilly liable for false arrest or false imprisonment when the merchant, merchant’s employee, farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent has probable cause to believe that the person committed retail theft, farm theft, transit fare evasion, or trespass.

(b) If a merchant or merchant’s employee takes a person into custody as provided in this section, or acts as a witness with respect to any person taken into custody as provided in this section, the merchant or merchant’s employee may provide his or her business address rather than home address to any investigating law enforcement officer.

(6) An individual who, while committing or after committing theft of property, transit fare evasion, or trespass, resists the reasonable effort of a law enforcement officer, merchant, merchant’s employee, farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent to recover the property or cause the individual to pay the proper transit fare or vacate the transit facility which the law enforcement officer, merchant, merchant’s employee, farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent had probable cause to believe the individual had concealed or removed from its place of display or elsewhere or perpetrated a transit fare evasion or trespass commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083, unless the individual did not know, or did not have reason to know, that the person seeking to recover the property was a law enforcement officer, merchant, merchant’s employee, farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent. For purposes of this section the charge of theft and the charge of resisting may be tried concurrently.

(7) It is unlawful to possess, or use or attempt to use, any antishoplifting or inventory control device countermeasure within any premises used for the retail purchase or sale of any merchandise. Any person who possesses any antishoplifting or inventory control device countermeasure within any premises used for the retail purchase or sale of any merchandise commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Any person who uses or attempts to use any antishoplifting or inventory control device countermeasure within any premises used for the retail purchase or sale of any merchandise commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

(8) Except as provided in subsection (9) or subsection (11), a person who commits retail theft commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084, if the person:

(a) Individually, or in concert with one or more other persons, coordinates the activities of one or more individuals in committing the offense, which may occur through multiple acts of retail theft, in which the amount of each individual theft is aggregated within a 120-day period to determine the value of the property stolen and such value is $750 or more;

(b) Conspires with another person to commit retail theft with the intent to sell the stolen property for monetary or other gain, and subsequently takes or causes such property to be placed in the control of another person in exchange for consideration, in which the stolen property taken or placed within a 120-day period is aggregated to determine the value of the stolen property and such value is $750 or more;

(c) Individually, or in concert with one or more other persons, commits theft from more than one location within a 120-day period, in which the amount of each individual theft is aggregated to determine the value of the property stolen and such value is $750 or more;

(d) Acts in concert with one or more other individuals within one or more establishments to distract the merchant, merchant’s employee, or law enforcement officer in order to carry out the offense, or acts in other ways to coordinate efforts to carry out the offense and such value is $750 or more;

(e) Commits the offense through the purchase of merchandise in a package or box that contains merchandise other than, or in addition to, the merchandise purported to be contained in the package or box and such value is $750 or more;

(f) Individually, or in concert with one or more other persons, commits three or more retail thefts within a 120-day period and in committing such thefts obtains or uses 10 or more items of merchandise, and the number of items stolen during each theft is aggregated within the 120-day period to determine the total number of items stolen, regardless of the value of such merchandise, and two or more of the thefts occur at different physical merchant locations; or

(g) Acts in concert with five or more other persons within one or more establishments for the purpose of overwhelming the response of a merchant, merchant’s employee, or law enforcement officer in order to carry out the offense or avoid detection or apprehension for the offense.

(9) Except as provided in subsection (11), a person commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084, if the person:

(a) Violates subsection (8) and has previously been convicted of a violation of subsection (8) or of this subsection;

(b) Individually, or in concert with one or more other persons, coordinates the activities of one or more persons in committing the offense of retail theft, in which the amount of each individual theft within a 120-day period is aggregated to determine the value of the stolen property and such value is in excess of $3,000;

(c) Conspires with another person to commit retail theft with the intent to sell the stolen property for monetary or other gain, and subsequently takes or causes such property to be placed in control of another person in exchange for consideration, in which the stolen property taken or placed within a 120-day period is aggregated to have a value in excess of $3,000;

(d) Individually, or in concert with one or more other persons, commits three or more retail thefts within a 120-day period and in committing such thefts obtains or uses 20 or more items of merchandise, and the number of items stolen during each theft is aggregated within the 120-day period to determine the total number of items stolen, regardless of the value of such merchandise, and two or more of the thefts occur at a different physical retail merchant location; or

(e) Acts in concert with five or more other persons within one or more establishments for the purpose of overwhelming the response of a merchant, merchant’s employee, or law enforcement officer in order to carry out the offense or avoid detection or apprehension for the offense and, in the course of organizing or committing the offense, solicits the participation of another person in the offense through the use of a social media platform.

(10) If a person commits retail theft in more than one judicial circuit within a 120-day period, the value of the stolen property resulting from the thefts in each judicial circuit may be aggregated, and the person must be prosecuted by the Office of the Statewide Prosecutor in accordance with s. 16.56.

(11) A person commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084, if he or she violates subsection (8) or subsection (9) and:

(a) Has two or more previous convictions of violations of either or both of those subsections; or

(b) Possesses a firearm during the commission of such offense.

(12) A court must order a person convicted of violating this section to pay restitution, which must include the value of merchandise that was damaged or stolen and the cost of repairing or replacing any other property that was damaged in the course of committing the offense.

(13) The Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability (OPPAGA) shall perform a study every 5 years to determine the appropriateness of the threshold amounts included in this section. The study’s scope must include, but need not be limited to, the crime trends related to theft offenses, the theft threshold amounts of other states in effect at the time of the study, the fiscal impact of any modifications to this state’s threshold amounts, and the effect on economic factors, such as inflation. The study must include options for amending the threshold amounts if the study finds that such amounts are inconsistent with current trends. In conducting the study, OPPAGA shall consult with the Office of Economic and Demographic Research in addition to other interested entities. OPPAGA shall submit a report to the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives by September 1 of every 5th year.

History.—s. 2, ch. 78-348; s. 177, ch. 79-164; s. 1, ch. 80-379; s. 1, ch. 81-108; s. 1, ch. 81-163; s. 165, ch. 83-216; s. 2, ch. 86-161; s. 1, ch. 88-325; s. 40, ch. 91-110; s. 190, ch. 91-224; s. 2, ch. 92-79; s. 11, ch. 95-184; s. 1, ch. 96-366; s. 1820, ch. 97-102; s. 33, ch. 97-280; s. 3, ch. 2001-115; s. 2, ch. 2007-177; s. 63, ch. 2011-206; s. 18, ch. 2012-83; s. 37, ch. 2019-167; s. 5, ch. 2021-7; s. 64, ch. 2022-4; s. 1, ch. 2022-192; s. 2, ch. 2024-69.

F.S. 812.015 on Google Scholar

F.S. 812.015 on Casetext

Amendments to 812.015

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 812.015

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S812.015 2 - SHOPLIFTING - REMOVED - M: F

S812.015 2 - LARC - REMOVED - M: F

S812.015 2 - LARC - REMOVED - F: T

S812.015 6 - RESIST OFFICER - REVISED. SEE REC # 7005 - M: F

S812.015 6 - CRIMES AGAINST PERSON - REVISED. SEE REC # 7005 - M: F

S812.015 6 - LARC - RESIST ARREST COMM THEFT RESIST RECOV OF PROP - M: F

S812.015 7 - LARC - USE ANTI-SHOPLIFTING DEVICE - F: T

S812.015 7 - LARC - POSSESS ANTI-SHOPLIFTING DEVICE - F: T

S812.015 8 - LARC - RENUMBERED. SEE REC #s 6006 6007 6008 6009 - F: T

S812.015 8a - LARC - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 8913 - F: T

S812.015 8a - LARC - RETAIL THEFT $750+ OR COORDINATE W OTHERS - F: T

S812.015 8a - LARC - RETAIL THEFT $750+ OR COORD W OTHERS PREV CONV - F: S

S812.015 8b - LARC - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 8776 - F: T

S812.015 8b - LARC - RET THEFT CONSPIR SELL STOL PROP 750 DOL MORE - F: T

S812.015 8b - LARC - RETAIL THEFT SELL STOLEN PROP $750+ PREV CONV - F: S

S812.015 8c - LARC - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 8777 - F: T

S812.015 8c - LARC - RETAIL THEFT 750 MORE DOLS MULTIPLE LOCATIONS - F: T

S812.015 8c - LARC - RETAIL THEFT $750+ MULTIPLE LOCATION PREV CONV - F: S

S812.015 8d - LARC - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 8778 - F: T

S812.015 8d - LARC - RETAIL THEFT 750 MORE DOLS OTHERS DISTRACT - F: T

S812.015 8d - LARC - RETAIL THEFT $750+ OTHER DISTRACT PREV CONV - F: S

S812.015 8e - LARC - RETAIL THEFT 750 MORE DOLS SWITCH CONTENTS - F: T

S812.015 8e - LARC - RETAIL THEFT $750+ SWITCH CONTENTS PREV CONV - F: S

S812.015 8f - LARC - MULTIPLE THEFTS WI SPECIFIED TIME PERIOD - F: T

S812.015 8f - LARC - MULTIPLE THEFT WI SPECIFIED TIME PER PREV CONV - F: S

S812.015 9 - LARC - RENUMBERED. SEE REC#6401 - F: S

S812.015 9a - LARC - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 8730 - F: S

S812.015 9a - LARC - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9559 - F: S

S812.015 9a - LARC - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9560 - F: S

S812.015 9a - LARC - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9561 - F: S

S812.015 9a - LARC - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9562 - F: S

S812.015 9a - LARC - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9563 - F: S

S812.015 9b - LARC - COORDINATE OTHERS RETAIL THEFT OVER 3K DOLS - F: S

S812.015 9c - LARC - RETAIL THEFT CONSPR SELL EXCESS 3K DOL - F: S

S812.015 9d - LARC - MULTIPLE THEFTS WI TIME PERIOD - F: S

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 812.015

Total Results: 20

Raymond Anthony Lee v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-02-14T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: convenience store. We affirm, concluding that section 812.015(4), Florida Statutes (2022), gave the officers

Malik Mocombe v. The State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-02-14T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: retail establishment, in violation of section 812.015(7), Florida Statutes (2022). Because the…instructions to dismiss the challenged charge. § 812.015(1)(i), Fla. Stat.; Tallahassee Mem’l Reg’l Med

ALEXANDER MARTINEZ-RIVERO v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-02-02T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: device countermeasure in violation of section 812.015(7), Florida Statutes. On appeal, Martinez-Rivero… ANALYSIS Section 812.015(7), Florida Statutes, provides, “[i]t is unlawful… of such a device is a third-degree felony. § 812.015(7), Fla. Stat. Under the statutory scheme…of specially marked or tagged merchandise.” § 812.015(1)(h), Fla. Stat. Relying upon State v. Blunt…antishoplifting or inventory control device.” § 812.015(1)(i), Fla. Stat. Given the lack of qualifying

Advisory Opinion to the Governor Re: Implementation of Amendment 4, The Voting Restoration Amendment

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2020-01-15T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: meaning of “all terms of sentence.” See, e.g., § 812.15(7), Fla. Stat. (2019) (“The court shall, in addition

In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2018-06.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2018-12-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 260 So. 3d 941

Snippet: degree Battery 784.03 8.3 Resisting a Merchant 812.015(6) 14.4 *947*ROBBERY WITH A WEAPON - 812.13(2)(…degree Battery 784.03 8.3 Resisting a Merchant 812.015(6) 14.4 *948ROBBERY - 812.13(2)(c) CATEGORY ONE…degree Battery 784.03 8.3 Resisting a Merchant 812.015(6) 14.4 Comments If applicable, see Instruction…784.041 8.5 Battery 784.03 8.3 Resisting a Merchant 812.015(6) 14.4 Comments * The only increased

In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2018-06

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2018-12-19T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: degree Battery 784.03 8 .3 Resisting a Merchant 812.015(6) 14.4 10 fROBBERY WITH A …degree Battery 784.03 8.3 Resisting a Merchant 812.015(6) 14.4 11 ROBBERY _ 812.13…degree Battery 784.03 8.3 Resisting a Merchant 812.015(6) 14.4 Comments lf applicable, see…784.041 8.5 Battery 784.03 8.3 Resisting a Merchant 812.015(6) 14.4 Comments *The only increased penalty under

SYMONE JUSTINE BENT v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-10-24T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 257 So. 3d 501

Snippet: presence? Because the legislature enacted section 812.015(3)(a), Florida Statutes, which provides that law… The issue on appeal is governed by section 812.015, Florida Statutes (2016). That statute provides…manner for a reasonable length of time. § 812.015(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016). This, of course, is an… stop of the vehicle was authorized by section 812.015, Florida Statutes, because the officers had received…appropriately, noting that for the purposes of a section 812.015 detention or arrest, “[f]irst hand knowledge by

In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2017-04

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-11-29T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: instructs upon the offense defined under section 812.015, Florida Statutes (2017) (Retail and farm theft…the definition of “retail theft” under section 812.015(1)(d). Next, the third element includes all the…the circumstances set forth in section 812.015(8)(a)-(d). Lastly, the fourth element captures the requirement… -3- section 812.015(8), that the property must be valued at $300 or….4 RETAIL THEFT § 812.015(18), Fla._Stat. To prove the crime of Retail

McClover v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-04-19T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 217 So. 3d 96, 2017 WL 1399821, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5358

Snippet: commit retail theft is retail theft. Id. (citing § 812.015(l)(d), Fla. Stat. (2012)). We also confirmed that

In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES—REPORT NO. 2014-07

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2015-04-30T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 163 So. 3d 478, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 221, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 927, 2015 WL 1932145

Snippet: 15.5 RESISTING RECOVERY OF STOLEN PROPERTY § 812.015(6), Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Resisting…tangible personal property. *501 § 812.015(1), Fla. Stat. “Merchant” means an owner… purchase or sale of any merchandise. § 812.015(1), Fla. Stat. “Merchandise” means any personal…certain fact is true. Affirmative Defense. § 812.015(6), Fla. Stat. The statute and ease law…Offenses RESISTING RECOVERY OF STOLEN PROPERTY — 812.015(6) CATEGORY ONE CATEGORY TWO FLA. STAT. INS

State of Florida v. Thomas Marvin Lord

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-10-12T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 150 So. 3d 260

Snippet: to suppress, because under sections 901.15 and 812.015, Florida Statutes (2013), the officers did not …officers did not have the authority under section 812.015 to arrest defendants. See State v. Daniels…case by either supplanting or modifying section 812.015(4). Section 901.15(1) permits an officer to arrest… This case was instead controlled by section 812.015(4), which specifically addresses warrantless arrests…affirming summary judgment for K-Mart under sections 812.015(3) and (5) in a suit for false arrest for shoplifting

F.T. v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-09-17T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: more specific statutory treatment under section 812.015. Under the general theft provisions, “value…lawful right to ownership and sale of said item. § 812.015(1)(d), Fla. Stat. (emphasis added). Therefore

F.T. v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-09-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 146 So. 3d 1270, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14390, 2014 WL 4628512

Snippet: more specific statutory treatment under section 812.015. Under the general theft provisions, “value” is…lawful right to ownership and sale of said item. § 812.015(l)(d), Fla. Stat. (emphasis added). Therefore,

Cenatis v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-07-24T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 120 So. 3d 41, 2013 WL 3811766, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11593

Snippet: device countermeasure is prohibited by section 812.015(7), Florida Statutes (2010): It is unlawful to …antishoplifting or inventory control device. § 812.015(l)(h), (i), Fla. Stat. (2010). Cenatis relies on…The state charged Blunt with violating section 812.015(7). Id. Blunt moved to dismiss the charge, and …inventory control device countermeasure’ found in s. 812.015(l)(i) because tinfoil is *44not an item or device… by Cenatis fits the plain language of section 812.015(l)(i). An ordinary shopping bag fits the broad

McClover v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-05-15T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 125 So. 3d 926, 2013 WL 1980172, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7870

Snippet: of felony retail theft in violation of section 812.015(8)(a), Florida Statutes, Toccara McClover appeals…with grand theft, but with retail theft. Section 812.015(l)(d) defines retail theft as: taking possession

Milian v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-07-18T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 92 So. 3d 304, 2012 WL 2913223, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11693

Snippet: in concert with others in violation of section 812.015(8)(a). For the reasons set forth in *305Ms co-defendant

Rimondi v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-06-06T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 89 So. 3d 1059, 2012 WL 2010866, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9074

Snippet: in concert with others in violation of section 812.015(8)(a). Rimondi raises two issues on appeal; however… and felony retail theft as defined in section 812.015(8)(a). The elements of third-degree grand theft… elements of felony retail theft under section 812.015(8)(a) are: (1) Knowingly (2) taking possession …more individuals in committing the offense. See § 812.015(l)(d), (8)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). Although worded…by the retail theft offense defined in section 812.015(8)(a) “without regard to the charging document

In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—Report No. 2011-03

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2012-05-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 95 So. 3d 868, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 352, 2012 WL 2848895, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 961

Snippet: sought to track the statutory language of section 812.015(6), Florida Statutes (2011), which provides as

In Re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases—Report No. 09-01

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2010-03-04T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 35 So. 3d 666, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 149, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 302

Snippet: restraint under stated circumstances, e.g., F.S. 812.015, 901.15, 901.151 (2006). 407.9 BURDEN OF PROOF

Peterson v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-12-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 24 So. 3d 686, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19772, 2009 WL 4877693

Snippet: misdemeanor offense of resisting a merchant. See § 812.015(6). Both the State's case and Peterson'