Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 812.015 (2025)

Retail and farm theft; transit fare evasion; mandatory fine; alternative punishment; detention and arrest; exemption from liability for false arrest; resisting arrest; penalties.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

812.015 Retail and farm theft; transit fare evasion; mandatory fine; alternative punishment; detention and arrest; exemption from liability for false arrest; resisting arrest; penalties.—

(1) As used in this section:

(a) “Antishoplifting or inventory control device” means a mechanism or other device designed and operated for the purpose of detecting the removal from a mercantile establishment or similar enclosure, or from a protected area within such an enclosure, of specially marked or tagged merchandise. The term includes any electronic or digital imaging or any video recording or other film used for security purposes and the cash register tape or other record made of the register receipt.

(b) “Antishoplifting or inventory control device countermeasure” means any item or device which is designed, manufactured, modified, or altered to defeat any antishoplifting or inventory control device.

(c) “Farm produce” means livestock or any item grown, produced, or manufactured by a person owning, renting, or leasing land for the purpose of growing, producing, or manufacturing items for sale or personal use, either part time or full time.

(d) “Farm theft” means the unlawful taking possession of any items that are grown or produced on land owned, rented, or leased by another person. The term includes the unlawful taking possession of equipment and associated materials used to grow or produce farm products as defined in s. 823.14(3)(e).

(e) “Farmer” means a person who is engaging in the growing or producing of farm produce, milk products, honey, eggs, or meat, either part time or full time, for personal consumption or for sale and who is the owner or lessee of the land or a person designated in writing by the owner or lessee to act as her or his agent. No person defined as a farm labor contractor pursuant to s. 450.28 shall be designated to act as an agent for purposes of this section.

(f) “Mass transit vehicle” means buses, rail cars, or fixed-guideway mover systems operated by, or under contract to, state agencies, political subdivisions of the state, or municipalities for the transportation of fare-paying passengers.

(g) “Merchandise” means any personal property, capable of manual delivery, displayed, held, or offered for retail sale by a merchant.

(h) “Merchant” means an owner or operator, or the agent, consignee, employee, lessee, or officer of an owner or operator, of any premises or apparatus used for retail purchase or sale of any merchandise.

(i) “Retail theft” means the taking possession of or carrying away of merchandise, property, money, or negotiable documents; altering or removing a label, universal product code, or price tag; transferring merchandise from one container to another; or removing a shopping cart, with intent to deprive the merchant of possession, use, benefit, or full retail value.

(j) “Social media platform” has the same meaning as provided in s. 501.2041(1).

(k) “Transit agency” means any state agency, political subdivision of the state, or municipality which operates mass transit vehicles.

(l) “Transit fare evasion” means the unlawful refusal to pay the appropriate fare for transportation upon a mass transit vehicle, or to evade the payment of such fare, or to enter any mass transit vehicle or facility by any door, passageway, or gate, except as provided for the entry of fare-paying passengers, and shall constitute petit theft as proscribed by this chapter.

(m) “Trespass” means the violation as described in s. 810.08.

(n) “Value of merchandise” means the sale price of the merchandise at the time it was stolen or otherwise removed, depriving the owner of her or his lawful right to ownership and sale of said item.

(2) Upon a second or subsequent conviction for petit theft from a merchant, farmer, or transit agency, the offender shall be punished as provided in s. 812.014(3), except that the court shall impose a fine of not less than $50 or more than $1,000. However, in lieu of such fine, the court may require the offender to perform public services designated by the court. In no event shall any such offender be required to perform fewer than the number of hours of public service necessary to satisfy the fine assessed by the court, as provided by this subsection, at the minimum wage prevailing in the state at the time of sentencing.

(3)(a) A law enforcement officer, a merchant, a farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent, who has probable cause to believe that a retail theft, farm theft, a transit fare evasion, or trespass, or unlawful use or attempted use of any antishoplifting or inventory control device countermeasure, has been committed by a person and, in the case of retail or farm theft, that the property can be recovered by taking the offender into custody may, for the purpose of attempting to effect such recovery or for prosecution, take the offender into custody and detain the offender in a reasonable manner for a reasonable length of time. In the case of a farmer, taking into custody shall be effectuated only on property owned or leased by the farmer. In the event the merchant, merchant’s employee, farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent takes the person into custody, a law enforcement officer shall be called to the scene immediately after the person has been taken into custody.

(b) The activation of an antishoplifting or inventory control device as a result of a person exiting an establishment or a protected area within an establishment shall constitute reasonable cause for the detention of the person so exiting by the owner or operator of the establishment or by an agent or employee of the owner or operator, provided sufficient notice has been posted to advise the patrons that such a device is being utilized. Each such detention shall be made only in a reasonable manner and only for a reasonable period of time sufficient for any inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the activation of the device.

(c) The taking into custody and detention by a law enforcement officer, merchant, merchant’s employee, farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent, if done in compliance with all the requirements of this subsection, shall not render such law enforcement officer, merchant, merchant’s employee, farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent, criminally or civilly liable for false arrest, false imprisonment, or unlawful detention.

(4) Any law enforcement officer may arrest, either on or off the premises and without warrant, any person the officer has probable cause to believe unlawfully possesses, or is unlawfully using or attempting to use or has used or attempted to use, any antishoplifting or inventory control device countermeasure or has committed theft in a retail or wholesale establishment or on commercial or private farm lands of a farmer or transit fare evasion or trespass.

(5)(a) A merchant, merchant’s employee, farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent who takes a person into custody, as provided in subsection (3), or who causes an arrest, as provided in subsection (4), of a person for retail theft, farm theft, transit fare evasion, or trespass shall not be criminally or civilly liable for false arrest or false imprisonment when the merchant, merchant’s employee, farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent has probable cause to believe that the person committed retail theft, farm theft, transit fare evasion, or trespass.

(b) If a merchant or merchant’s employee takes a person into custody as provided in this section, or acts as a witness with respect to any person taken into custody as provided in this section, the merchant or merchant’s employee may provide his or her business address rather than home address to any investigating law enforcement officer.

(6) An individual who, while committing or after committing theft of property, transit fare evasion, or trespass, resists the reasonable effort of a law enforcement officer, merchant, merchant’s employee, farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent to recover the property or cause the individual to pay the proper transit fare or vacate the transit facility which the law enforcement officer, merchant, merchant’s employee, farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent had probable cause to believe the individual had concealed or removed from its place of display or elsewhere or perpetrated a transit fare evasion or trespass commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083, unless the individual did not know, or did not have reason to know, that the person seeking to recover the property was a law enforcement officer, merchant, merchant’s employee, farmer, or a transit agency’s employee or agent. For purposes of this section the charge of theft and the charge of resisting may be tried concurrently.

(7) It is unlawful to possess, or use or attempt to use, any antishoplifting or inventory control device countermeasure within any premises used for the retail purchase or sale of any merchandise. Any person who possesses any antishoplifting or inventory control device countermeasure within any premises used for the retail purchase or sale of any merchandise commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Any person who uses or attempts to use any antishoplifting or inventory control device countermeasure within any premises used for the retail purchase or sale of any merchandise commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

(8) Except as provided in subsection (9) or subsection (11), a person who commits retail theft commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084, if the person:

(a) Individually, or in concert with one or more other persons, coordinates the activities of one or more individuals in committing the offense, which may occur through multiple acts of retail theft, in which the amount of each individual theft is aggregated within a 120-day period to determine the value of the property stolen and such value is $750 or more;

(b) Conspires with another person to commit retail theft with the intent to sell the stolen property for monetary or other gain, and subsequently takes or causes such property to be placed in the control of another person in exchange for consideration, in which the stolen property taken or placed within a 120-day period is aggregated to determine the value of the stolen property and such value is $750 or more;

(c) Individually, or in concert with one or more other persons, commits theft from more than one location within a 120-day period, in which the amount of each individual theft is aggregated to determine the value of the property stolen and such value is $750 or more;

(d) Acts in concert with one or more other individuals within one or more establishments to distract the merchant, merchant’s employee, or law enforcement officer in order to carry out the offense, or acts in other ways to coordinate efforts to carry out the offense and such value is $750 or more;

(e) Commits the offense through the purchase of merchandise in a package or box that contains merchandise other than, or in addition to, the merchandise purported to be contained in the package or box and such value is $750 or more;

(f) Individually, or in concert with one or more other persons, commits three or more retail thefts within a 120-day period and in committing such thefts obtains or uses 10 or more items of merchandise, and the number of items stolen during each theft is aggregated within the 120-day period to determine the total number of items stolen, regardless of the value of such merchandise, and two or more of the thefts occur at different physical merchant locations; or

(g) Acts in concert with five or more other persons within one or more establishments for the purpose of overwhelming the response of a merchant, merchant’s employee, or law enforcement officer in order to carry out the offense or avoid detection or apprehension for the offense.

(9) Except as provided in subsection (11), a person commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084, if the person:

(a) Violates subsection (8) and has previously been convicted of a violation of subsection (8) or of this subsection;

(b) Individually, or in concert with one or more other persons, coordinates the activities of one or more persons in committing the offense of retail theft, in which the amount of each individual theft within a 120-day period is aggregated to determine the value of the stolen property and such value is in excess of $3,000;

(c) Conspires with another person to commit retail theft with the intent to sell the stolen property for monetary or other gain, and subsequently takes or causes such property to be placed in control of another person in exchange for consideration, in which the stolen property taken or placed within a 120-day period is aggregated to have a value in excess of $3,000;

(d) Individually, or in concert with one or more other persons, commits three or more retail thefts within a 120-day period and in committing such thefts obtains or uses 20 or more items of merchandise, and the number of items stolen during each theft is aggregated within the 120-day period to determine the total number of items stolen, regardless of the value of such merchandise, and two or more of the thefts occur at a different physical retail merchant location; or

(e) Acts in concert with five or more other persons within one or more establishments for the purpose of overwhelming the response of a merchant, merchant’s employee, or law enforcement officer in order to carry out the offense or avoid detection or apprehension for the offense and, in the course of organizing or committing the offense, solicits the participation of another person in the offense through the use of a social media platform.

(10) If a person commits retail theft in more than one judicial circuit within a 120-day period, the value of the stolen property resulting from the thefts in each judicial circuit may be aggregated, and the person must be prosecuted by the Office of the Statewide Prosecutor in accordance with s. 16.56.

(11) A person commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084, if he or she violates subsection (8) or subsection (9) and:

(a) Has two or more previous convictions of violations of either or both of those subsections; or

(b) Possesses a firearm during the commission of such offense.

(12) A court must order a person convicted of violating this section to pay restitution, which must include the value of merchandise that was damaged or stolen and the cost of repairing or replacing any other property that was damaged in the course of committing the offense.

(13) The Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability (OPPAGA) shall perform a study every 5 years to determine the appropriateness of the threshold amounts included in this section. The study’s scope must include, but need not be limited to, the crime trends related to theft offenses, the theft threshold amounts of other states in effect at the time of the study, the fiscal impact of any modifications to this state’s threshold amounts, and the effect on economic factors, such as inflation. The study must include options for amending the threshold amounts if the study finds that such amounts are inconsistent with current trends. In conducting the study, OPPAGA shall consult with the Office of Economic and Demographic Research in addition to other interested entities. OPPAGA shall submit a report to the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives by September 1 of every 5th year.

History.—s. 2, ch. 78-348; s. 177, ch. 79-164; s. 1, ch. 80-379; s. 1, ch. 81-108; s. 1, ch. 81-163; s. 165, ch. 83-216; s. 2, ch. 86-161; s. 1, ch. 88-325; s. 40, ch. 91-110; s. 190, ch. 91-224; s. 2, ch. 92-79; s. 11, ch. 95-184; s. 1, ch. 96-366; s. 1820, ch. 97-102; s. 33, ch. 97-280; s. 3, ch. 2001-115; s. 2, ch. 2007-177; s. 63, ch. 2011-206; s. 18, ch. 2012-83; s. 37, ch. 2019-167; s. 5, ch. 2021-7; s. 64, ch. 2022-4; s. 1, ch. 2022-192; s. 2, ch. 2024-69.

Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 812.015

M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd

§812.015(2)SHOPLIFTINGREMOVEDM · 1st

§812.015(2)LARCREMOVEDM · 1st

§812.015(2)LARCREMOVEDF · 3rd

§812.015(6)CRIMES AGAINST PERSONREVISED. SEE REC # 7005M · 1st

§812.015(6)LARCRESIST ARREST COMM THEFT RESIST RECOV OF PROPM · 1st

§812.015(6)RESIST OFFICERREVISED. SEE REC # 7005M · 1st

§812.015(6)CRIMES AGAINST PERSONREVISED. SEE REC # 7005M · 1st

§812.015(7)LARCUSE ANTI-SHOPLIFTING DEVICEF · 3rd

§812.015(7)LARCPOSSESS ANTI-SHOPLIFTING DEVICEF · 3rd

§812.015(8)LARCRENUMBERED. SEE REC #s 6006 6007 6008 6009F · 3rd

§812.015(8a)LARCRETAIL THEFT 0+ OR COORDINATE W OTHERSF · 3rd

§812.015(8a)LARCRETAIL THEFT 0+ OR COORD W OTHERS PREV CONVF · 2nd

§812.015(8a)LARCRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 8913F · 3rd

§812.015(8a)LARCRETAIL THEFT 0+ OR COORD W OTHERS 2+ CONVF · 1st

§812.015(8a)LARCRETAIL THEFT 0+ OR COORD W OTHERS FIREARMF · 1st

§812.015(8b)LARCRET THEFT CONSPIR SELL STOL PROP 750 DOL MOREF · 3rd

§812.015(8b)LARCRETAIL THEFT SELL STOLEN PROP 0+ PREV CONVF · 2nd

§812.015(8b)LARCRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 8776F · 3rd

§812.015(8b)LARCRETAIL THEFT SELL STOLEN PROP 0+ 2+ CONVF · 1st

§812.015(8b)LARCRETAIL THEFT SELL STOLEN PROP 0+ FIREARMF · 1st

§812.015(8c)LARCRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 8777F · 3rd

§812.015(8c)LARCRETAIL THEFT GT 1 LOCATION 0+ WI 120 DAYSF · 3rd

§812.015(8c)LARCRETAIL THEFT 0+ MULTIPLE LOCATION PREV CONVF · 2nd

§812.015(8c)LARCRETAIL THEFT 0+ MULTIPLE LOCATION FIREARMF · 1st

§812.015(8c)LARCRETAIL THEFT 0+ MULTIPLE LOCATION 2+ CONVF · 1st

§812.015(8d)LARCRETAIL THEFT 0+ OTHER DISTRACT PREV CONVF · 2nd

§812.015(8d)LARCRETAIL THEFT VALUE 0+ DISTRACT MERCHANT/LEOF · 3rd

§812.015(8d)LARCRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 8778F · 3rd

§812.015(8d)LARCRETAIL THEFT 0+ OTHERS DISTRACT 2+ CONVF · 1st

§812.015(8d)LARCRETAIL THEFT 0+ OTHERS DISTRACT FIREARMF · 1st

§812.015(8e)LARCRETAIL THEFT 0+ CONCEALED/ADDED MERCHANDISEF · 3rd

§812.015(8e)LARCRETAIL THEFT 0+ SWITCH CONTENTS PREV CONVF · 2nd

§812.015(8e)LARCRETAIL THEFT 0+ SWITCH CONTENTS 2+ CONVF · 1st

§812.015(8e)LARCRETAIL THEFT 0+ SWITCH CONTENTS FIREARMF · 1st

§812.015(8f)LARCMULTIPLE THEFTS W/I SPECIFIED TIME PERIODF · 3rd

§812.015(8f)LARCMULTIPLE THEFT W/I SPECIFIED TIME PREV CONVF · 2nd

§812.015(8f)LARCMULTIPLE THEFTS W/I SPECIFIED TIME PER 2+ CONVF · 1st

§812.015(8f)LARCMULTIPLE THEFT W/I SPECIFIED TIME FIREARMF · 1st

§812.015(8g)LARCRETAIL THEFT ACT W/ 5+ PERSON TO OVERWHELMF · 3rd

§812.015(8g)LARCRETAIL THEFT ACT W/ 5+ TO OVERWHELM PREV CONVF · 2nd

§812.015(8g)LARCRETAIL THEFT ACT W/ 5+ TO OVERWHELM 2+ CONVF · 1st

§812.015(8g)LARCRETAIL THEFT ACT W/ 5+ TO OVERWHELM FIREARMF · 1st

§812.015(9)LARCRENUMBERED. SEE REC#6401F · 2nd

§812.015(9a)LARCRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 8730F · 2nd

§812.015(9a)LARCRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9559F · 2nd

§812.015(9a)LARCRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9560F · 2nd

§812.015(9a)LARCRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9561F · 2nd

§812.015(9a)LARCRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9562F · 2nd

§812.015(9a)LARCRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9563F · 2nd

§812.015(9b)LARCCOORDINATE 1+ PERSON RETAIL THEFT VALUE GT KF · 2nd

§812.015(9b)LARCCOORDINATE OTHERS RETAIL THEFT K+ 2+ CONVF · 1st

§812.015(9b)LARCCOORDINATE OTHERS RETAIL THEFT K+ FIREARMF · 1st

§812.015(9c)LARCRETAIL THEFT CONSPR SELL EXCESS 3K DOLF · 2nd

§812.015(9c)LARCRETAIL THEFT CONSPIRE SELL VALUE K+ 2+ CONVF · 1st

§812.015(9c)LARCRETAIL THEFT CONSPIRE SELL VALUE K+ FIREARMF · 1st

§812.015(9d)LARCMULTIPLE THEFTS W/I TIME PERIODF · 2nd

§812.015(9d)LARCMULTIPLE THEFTS W/I TIME PERIOD 2+ CONVF · 1st

§812.015(9d)LARCMULTIPLE THEFTS W/I TIME PERIOD FIREARMF · 1st

§812.015(9e)LARCACT W/ 5+ TO OVERWHELM/SOLICIT ON SOCIAL MEDIAF · 2nd

§812.015(9e)LARCACT W/ 5+ OVERWHELM/ORG SOCIAL MEDIA 2+ CONVF · 1st

§812.015(9e)LARCACT W/ 5+ OVERWHELM/ORG SOCIAL MEDIA FIREARMF · 1st

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 78 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1980–2025 · leading case: Weissman v. K-Mart Corp., 396 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Weissman v. K-Mart Corp., 396 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). · cites it 6× “Now directing our attention to appellants' other cause of action, we note that the limited protection afforded by Section 812.015 does not extend to claims of malicious prosecution.”

Stuckey v. State, 972 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). · cites it 6× “See § 812.015(6), Fla. Stat. (2004); see also Lane v.”

State v. Jones, 461 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1984). · cites it 10× “We do not agree with the Third District or Judge Rawls that section 812.015, Florida Statutes raises the action of a store employee charged with the duty of protecting his employer's property interests to the level of state action for purposes of invoking the protection of the…”

State v. Larson, 365 P.3d 740 (Wash. 2015). · cites it 2× “” Fla. Stat. § 812.015 (7). An “antishoplifting or inventory control device countermeasure” is defined as “any item or device which is designed, manufactured, modified, or altered to defeat any antishoplifting or inventory control device.”

Rimondi v. State, 89 So. 3d 1059 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). · cites it 7× “In 1985, the Florida Supreme Court held, "Under section 812.015, retail theft is a species of the theft defined in section 812.”

In Re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases—report No. 2014-07, 163 So. 3d 478 (Fla. 2015). · cites it 10× “*501 § 812.015(1), Fla. Stat. “Merchant” means an owner or operator, or the agent, consignee, employee, lessee, or officer of an owner or operator, of any premises or apparatus used for retail purchase or sale of any merchandise.”

Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 2000). “23 (dealing with secondary metals recyclers) to correspond with the changes to the theft statute; section 11 amends the retail and farm theft statute (section 812.015) to reflect the changes in the theft statute; section 12 amends the criminal justice information statutes…”

Lane v. State, 867 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). · cites it 4× “Frederick Lane appeals his conviction for resisting a merchant's employee's efforts to recover stolen property in violation of section 812.015(6), Florida Statutes (2002), arguing that the trial court's failure to instruct the jury on two of the elements of the crime constituted…”

Symone Justine Bent v. State of Florida, 257 So. 3d 501 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). · cites it 12× “The issue on appeal is governed by section 812.015, Florida Statutes (2016).”

Emshwiller v. State, 443 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). · cites it 10× “In sorting through the confusion, we must decide whether or not "retail theft" of merchandise, as defined in section 812.015, Florida Statutes (1981), where value is alleged and proved, is a separate criminal offense from "theft" as contemplated by section 812.”

Emshwiller v. State, 462 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 1985). · cites it 5× “015, and concluding that section 812.015 created no new crime of retail theft, but "simply provided a set standard by which the market value of property stolen from a retail establishment is determined.”

Royal v. State, 452 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). · cites it 4× “) and "the taking possession of" in the retail theft statute (§ 812.015(1)(d), Fla. Stat.) and "the taking" in the robbery statute (§ 812.”

Show all 78 citing cases →

— 812.015(1) — 4 cases

In Re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases—report No. 2014-07, 163 So. 3d 478 (Fla. 2015). “*501 § 812.015(1), Fla. Stat. “Merchant” means an owner or operator, or the agent, consignee, employee, lessee, or officer of an owner or operator, of any premises or apparatus used for retail purchase or sale of any merchandise.”

Anthony Distributors, Inc. v. Miller Brewing Co., 941 F. Supp. 1567 (M.D. Fla. 1996).

State v. Blunt, 744 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

C.G. v. State, 981 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

— 812.015(1)(a) — 1 case

In Re: Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases - Report 2017-04 (Fla. 2017).

— 812.015(1)(b) — 3 cases

Epps v. State, 728 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Stuckey v. State, 907 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

In Re: Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases - Report 2017-04 (Fla. 2017).

— 812.015(1)(c) — 4 cases

Emshwiller v. State, 462 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 1985). “015, and concluding that section 812.015 created no new crime of retail theft, but "simply provided a set standard by which the market value of property stolen from a retail establishment is determined.”

Emshwiller v. State, 443 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). “In sorting through the confusion, we must decide whether or not "retail theft" of merchandise, as defined in section 812.015, Florida Statutes (1981), where value is alleged and proved, is a separate criminal offense from "theft" as contemplated by section 812.”

Jones v. State, 434 So. 2d 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

In Re: Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases - Report 2017-04 (Fla. 2017).

— 812.015(1)(d) — 3 cases

Royal v. State, 452 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). “) and "the taking possession of" in the retail theft statute (§ 812.015(1)(d), Fla. Stat.) and "the taking" in the robbery statute (§ 812.”

F.T. v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).

— 812.015(1)(h) — 1 case

Alexander Martinez-rivero v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).

— 812.015(1)(i) — 2 cases

Alexander Martinez-rivero v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).

Malik Mocombe v. The State of Florida (Fla. 3d DCA 2024).

— 812.015(1)(j) — 1 case

CG v. State, 981 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

— 812.015(18) — 1 case

In Re: Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases - Report 2017-04 (Fla. 2017).

— 812.015(2) — 1 case

— 812.015(3) — 4 cases

Weissman v. K-Mart Corp., 396 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). “Now directing our attention to appellants' other cause of action, we note that the limited protection afforded by Section 812.015 does not extend to claims of malicious prosecution.”

Jack Eckerd Corp. v. Smith, 558 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

State v. Jones, 461 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1984). “We do not agree with the Third District or Judge Rawls that section 812.015, Florida Statutes raises the action of a store employee charged with the duty of protecting his employer's property interests to the level of state action for purposes of invoking the protection of the…”

Pearce v. US Fid. & Guar. Co., 476 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

— 812.015(3)(a) — 10 cases

Symone Justine Bent v. State of Florida, 257 So. 3d 501 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). “The issue on appeal is governed by section 812.015, Florida Statutes (2016).”

Rodriguez v. State, 29 So. 3d 310 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

Smith v. State, 743 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

Snell v. State, 932 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

— 812.015(3)(b) — 1 case

Tironi v. Pantry Pride Enter., Inc., 519 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

— 812.015(3)(c) — 2 cases

Pearce v. US Fid. & Guar. Co., 476 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

Pollock v. Albertson's, Inc., 458 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

— 812.015(4) — 3 cases

State of Florida v. Thomas Marvin Lord, 150 So. 3d 260 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

Raymond Anthony Lee v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2024).

— 812.015(5) — 1 case

Canto v. JB Ivey & Co., 595 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

— 812.015(6) — 27 cases

Stuckey v. State, 972 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). “See § 812.015(6), Fla. Stat. (2004); see also Lane v.”

Lane v. State, 867 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). “Frederick Lane appeals his conviction for resisting a merchant's employee's efforts to recover stolen property in violation of section 812.015(6), Florida Statutes (2002), arguing that the trial court's failure to instruct the jury on two of the elements of the crime constituted…”

In re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases—Report No. 2011-03, 95 So. 3d 868 (Fla. 2012).

Johnson v. State, 855 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

— 812.015(7) — 4 cases

State v. Blunt, 744 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Cenatis v. State, 120 So. 3d 41 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

Alexander Martinez-rivero v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).

Malik Mocombe v. The State of Florida (Fla. 3d DCA 2024).

— 812.015(8) — 1 case

In Re: Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases - Report 2017-04 (Fla. 2017).

— 812.015(8)(a) — 4 cases

Rimondi v. State, 89 So. 3d 1059 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). “In 1985, the Florida Supreme Court held, "Under section 812.015, retail theft is a species of the theft defined in section 812.”

McClover v. State, 125 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

In Re: Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases - Report 2017-04 (Fla. 2017).

Milian v. State, 92 So. 3d 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

— 812.015(9) — 1 case

In Re: Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases - Report 2017-04 (Fla. 2017).

— 812.015(g) — 2 cases

J.B. v. State, 715 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

JB v. State, 715 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

— 812.015(l)(c) — 2 cases

Henry v. State, 864 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Tobe v. State, 435 So. 2d 401 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

— 812.015(l)(d) — 4 cases

F.T. v. State, 146 So. 3d 1270 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).

Rimondi v. State, 89 So. 3d 1059 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). “In 1985, the Florida Supreme Court held, "Under section 812.015, retail theft is a species of the theft defined in section 812.”

McClover v. State, 217 So. 3d 96 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

McClover v. State, 125 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

— 812.015(l)(h) — 2 cases

Cenatis v. State, 120 So. 3d 41 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

State v. Blunt, 744 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

— 812.015(l)(i) — 1 case

Cenatis v. State, 120 So. 3d 41 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

— 812.015(l)(j) — 1 case

C.G. v. State, 981 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.