Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 817.60
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§817.60(1)LARCTHEFT OF CREDIT CARDM · 1st
§817.60(2)LARCLOST OR DELIVERED BY MISTAKE CREDIT CARDM · 1st
§817.60(3)FRAUD-ILLEG USE CREDIT CARDSPURCHASE SELL ANOTHERSM · 1st
§817.60(4)FRAUD-ILLEG USE CREDIT CARDSAS DEBT SECURITYM · 1st
§817.60(5)FRAUD-ILLEG USE CREDIT CARDSDEAL IN ANOTHERSF · 3rd
§817.60(7)FRAUD-ILLEG USE CREDIT CARDSSIGN ANOTHERSM · 1st
§817.60(8)LARCPOSS RECEIVE RETAIN STOLEN CREDIT DEBIT CARDF · 3rd
§817.60(6a)PASS COUNTERFEITEDFALSELY MADE CREDIT CARDF · 3rd
§817.60(6a)FORGERY OFFALSELY EMBOSS OR ALTER CREDIT CARDF · 3rd
§817.60(6a)PASS FORGEDFALSELY EMBOSSED OR ALTERED CREDIT CARDF · 3rd
§817.60(6a)COUNTERFEITING OFFALSELY MAKE CREDIT CARDF · 3rd
§817.60(6a)POSSESS COUNTERFEITEDCREDIT CARD INVOICE SALES DRAFT VOUCHER ETCF · 3rd
§817.60(6b)POSSESS COUNTERFEITEDPOSSESS 2+ COUNTERFEIT CREDIT CARDSF · 3rd
Notes of Decisions
In re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-Report No. 2012-04, 131 So. 3d 720 (Fla. 2013).
· cites it 4× “8 UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF A STOLEN [CREDIT] [DEBIT] CARD § 817.60(8), Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Unlawful Possession of a Stolen [Credit] [Debit] Card, the State must prove the following four elements beyond a reasonable doubt: L (Defendant) knowingly [possessed] [received]…”
Gorday v. State, 907 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).
· cites it 8× “That is, there is no language in section 817.60 to evidence an intent for credit card theft to be punished separately from other theft penalties provided by law when the credit card theft arises out of a single criminal episode.”
Fayerweather v. State, 332 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 1976).
· cites it 2× “" The issue to be decided is whether conduct which violates both the State Credit Card Crime Act, Section 817.60(1), (3), Florida Statutes 1973, and the provision making it unlawful to receive stolen property, Section 811.”
Ruben B. Casais v. State, 204 So. 3d 969 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).
· cites it 3× “Ruben Casais appeals from his conviction for uttering a forged credit card in violation of section 817.60, Florida Statutes (2015). Appellant used altered gift cards to purchase cigarettes and other items at a Public grocery store.”
State v. Young, 357 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).
· cites it 2× “There it was held that conduct violative of both the State Credit Card Crime Act (specifically Section 817.60(1)(3), Florida Statutes [1973], dealing with receiving stolen credit cards) and the statute making it unlawful to receive stolen property (Section 811.”
State v. McCurdy, 257 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972).
· cites it 4× “Section 3(6) of the 1967 Act, which has been brought down in the current compilations as F.S. § 817.60 (6), F.S.A., provides that— “A person who, with intent to defraud a purported issuer or .”
State v. Cogswell, 521 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 1988).
“1976), we considered "whether conduct which violates both the State Credit Card Crime Act, Section 817.60(1), (3), Florida Statutes 1973, and the provision making it unlawful to receive stolen property, Section 811.”
Collins v. State, 626 So. 2d 991 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
· cites it 3× “Section 817.60(1), Florida Statutes (1991) (credit card theft), provides that any person who violates it is subject to penalties set forth in section 817.”
Simmons v. State, 594 So. 2d 853 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
· cites it 4× “Next, although not raised by the appellant, the written sentence reflects that appellant was charged under section 817.60, Florida Statutes, with five counts of forgery of a credit card ticket.”
In Re: Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-Report 2018-10., 259 So. 3d 765 (Fla. 2018).
· cites it 4× “8 UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF A STOLEN [CREDIT] [DEBIT] CARD § 817.60(8), Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Unlawful Possession of a Stolen [Credit] [Debit] Card, the State must prove the following four elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
D.P.B. v. State, 877 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).
· cites it 2× “This offense is a violation of § 817.60, Fla. Stat., punishable as a first-degree misdemeanor.”
State v. Vikhlyantsev, 602 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
“1976), the Florida Supreme Court considered whether conduct which violated both the State Credit Card Crime Act, section 817.60(1), (3), Florida Statutes (1973), and the provision making it unlawful to receive stolen property, section 811.”
— 817.60(1) — 10 cases
Gorday v. State, 907 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).
“That is, there is no language in section 817.60 to evidence an intent for credit card theft to be punished separately from other theft penalties provided by law when the credit card theft arises out of a single criminal episode.”
Fayerweather v. State, 332 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 1976).
“" The issue to be decided is whether conduct which violates both the State Credit Card Crime Act, Section 817.60(1), (3), Florida Statutes 1973, and the provision making it unlawful to receive stolen property, Section 811.”
State v. Cogswell, 521 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 1988).
“1976), we considered "whether conduct which violates both the State Credit Card Crime Act, Section 817.60(1), (3), Florida Statutes 1973, and the provision making it unlawful to receive stolen property, Section 811.”
Collins v. State, 626 So. 2d 991 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
“Section 817.60(1), Florida Statutes (1991) (credit card theft), provides that any person who violates it is subject to penalties set forth in section 817.”
State v. Vikhlyantsev, 602 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
“1976), the Florida Supreme Court considered whether conduct which violated both the State Credit Card Crime Act, section 817.60(1), (3), Florida Statutes (1973), and the provision making it unlawful to receive stolen property, section 811.”
— 817.60(1)(3) — 1 case
State v. Young, 357 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).
“There it was held that conduct violative of both the State Credit Card Crime Act (specifically Section 817.60(1)(3), Florida Statutes [1973], dealing with receiving stolen credit cards) and the statute making it unlawful to receive stolen property (Section 811.”
— 817.60(2) — 3 cases
— 817.60(5) — 1 case
— 817.60(6) — 1 case
State v. McCurdy, 257 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972).
“Section 3(6) of the 1967 Act, which has been brought down in the current compilations as F.S. § 817.60 (6), F.S.A., provides that— “A person who, with intent to defraud a purported issuer or .”
— 817.60(7) — 1 case
Simmons v. State, 594 So. 2d 853 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
“Next, although not raised by the appellant, the written sentence reflects that appellant was charged under section 817.60, Florida Statutes, with five counts of forgery of a credit card ticket.”
— 817.60(8) — 2 cases
In re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-Report No. 2012-04, 131 So. 3d 720 (Fla. 2013).
“8 UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF A STOLEN [CREDIT] [DEBIT] CARD § 817.60(8), Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Unlawful Possession of a Stolen [Credit] [Debit] Card, the State must prove the following four elements beyond a reasonable doubt: L (Defendant) knowingly [possessed] [received]…”
In Re: Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-Report 2018-10., 259 So. 3d 765 (Fla. 2018).
“8 UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF A STOLEN [CREDIT] [DEBIT] CARD § 817.60(8), Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Unlawful Possession of a Stolen [Credit] [Debit] Card, the State must prove the following four elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.