Cases from cite.case.law:

FUENTES, v. STATE, 219 So. 3d 956 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See section 831.02, Florida Statutes (2014). . . .

WALKER, v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 783 F.3d 1226 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 831.02, is categorically an aggravated felony offense, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(M)(i); and even if . . . Stat. § 831.02. One of the counts involved an amount over $10,000. . . . Walker does not contest that he was convicted of violating section 831.02 of the Florida Statutes, or . . . Stat. § 831.02. . . . That deceit makes a violation of section 831.02 an “aggravated felony.” B. . . .

GONZALEZ, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 570 F. App'x 549 (6th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 831.02 (1997). . . .

GALLIGAR, v. GALLIGAR,, 77 So. 3d 808 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . requires the former husband to pay 81% of his current net income to the former wife and to try to live on $831.02 . . .

PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In, 613 F.3d 179 (D.C. Cir. 2010)

. . . contracts with another entity to provide prescription drug benefits for its customers or clients,” § 48-831.02 . . .

GINN, v. STATE, 26 So. 3d 706 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . State, 921 So.2d 830, 833 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006): Section 831.02 provides that the crime of uttering a forged . . . Under section 831.02, it is not sufficient for the State to show that the defendant should have known . . .

STATE v. KONEGEN,, 18 So. 3d 697 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 831.02, Florida Statutes (2008), titled “Uttering forged instruments,” states as follows: Whoever . . .

PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 605 F. Supp. 2d 77 (D.D.C. 2009)

. . . Code § 48-831.02(4)(A). . . . .

E. A. R. a v. STATE, 4 So. 3d 614 (Fla. 2009)

. . . See § 831.02, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . . .

CASE, a v. ESLINGER, FL, a, 555 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 831.02, larceny of more than $300 but less than $2000, id. § 812.014, and as an accessory after the . . .

SOSA, v. HAMES,, 581 F. Supp. 2d 1254 (S.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . Defendants rely on Florida Statute Sections 831.01 and 831.02 as their bases for probable cause to arrest . . . Florida Statute Section 831.02 similarly makes it a felony to “utter[ ] and publish[ ] as true a false . . .

SHEPPARD, v. STATE, 988 So. 2d 74 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . § 831.02, Fla. Stat. (2001). An Assistant Public Defender (the APD) represented Mr. . . .

PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 522 F.3d 443 (D.C. Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 48-831.02(4)(a). . . .

STATE v. JARAMILLO, Jr., 951 So. 2d 97 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . See § 831.02, Fla. Stat. (2003). . . .

PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 477 F. Supp. 2d 86 (D.D.C. 2007)

. . . . § 2699(1)(A) with D.C.Code § 48-831.02(4)(A)(i). . . . Compare Me. § 2699(1)(A) with D.C.Code § 48-831.02(4)(A)(iii), as amended by Arndt. Sec. 2(a)(1). . . . Compare Me. § 2699(1)(B) with D.C.Code § 48-831.02(5). . . . D.C.Code § 48-831.02(5). . . . Compare Me. § 2699(1)(E) with D.C.Code § 48-831.02(16), as amended by Arndt. Sec. 2(a)(2). . . .

LINN, a k a v. STATE, 921 So. 2d 830 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Background Linn was charged by information with uttering a forged instrument, in contravention of section 831.02 . . . The Actual Knowledge Element of Uttering a Forged Instrument Section 831.02 provides that the crime of . . . Under section 831.02, it is not sufficient for the State to show that the defendant should have known . . . actually knew the check had been forged, as is required for Linn to be convicted of violating section 831.02 . . .

CHILDERS, v. STATE, 931 So. 2d 86 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See, e.g., §§ 831.01, 831.02, 831.07, 831.09, Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .

CHILDERS, v. STATE, 936 So. 2d 585 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See, e.g., §§ 831.01, 831.02, 831.07, 831.09, Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .

LONGVAL, v. STATE, 914 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . .2d 172 (Fla.1976), the supreme court held that there is no crime of attempted forgery under section 831.02 . . .

BILLUPS, Jr. v. STATE, 690 So. 2d 1381 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Section 831.02, Florida Statutes (1993), provides: Whoever utters and publishes as true a false, forged . . .

E. BRUCE, v. STATE, 687 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . . § 831.02, Fla.Stat. (1993). . § 800.04(3), Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

KING, v. STATE, 684 So. 2d 1388 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Pursuant to § 831.02, Fla.Stat. (1993), the elements of the offense of uttering a false or forged instrument . . .

BROWN, v. STATE, 674 So. 2d 738 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . violation of section 812.014, Florida Statutes (1981), and uttering a forgery, in violation of section 831.02 . . .

LEWIS, v. STATE, 667 So. 2d 292 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . .1994), then a person cannot commit the offense of uttering a forged instrument pursuant to section 831.02 . . . Lewis was prosecuted under section 831.02, Florida Statutes (1993), which prohibits knowingly uttering . . .

M. PARKER, v. STATE, 658 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Parker from a final judgment of conviction and sentence for uttering a forged instrument [§ 831.02, Fla.Stat . . . undisputed evidentiary showing constitutes a prima facie case of uttering a forged instrument under Section 831.02 . . . these orders constitute “a ... forged ... record ... or other writing mentioned in s. 831.01....” § 831.02 . . . Second, we conclude that the requisite statutory “intent to injure or defraud any person” under Section 831.02 . . .

M. HARDY, v. STATE, 655 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . . § 831.02, Fla.Stat. (1993). . Faretta v. . . .

PERRY, v. STATE, 653 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . . § 831.02, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . . .

SCHUHART, v. STATE, 647 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . . § 831.02, Fla.Stat. (1987). . § 831.01, Fla.Stat. (1987). . § 812.014(2)(c), Fla.Stat. (1987). . § . . .

G. BROWN, v. STATE, 639 So. 2d 634 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . . § 831.02, Fla.Stat. (1991). . § 401.41(2), Fla.Stat. (1991). .§ 812.014(2)(c)(l), Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

R. DAVIS, v. STATE, 634 So. 2d 287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . cases, to wit: Case No. 89-125 for third-degree uttering a forged instrument in violation of section 831.02 . . .

TURCOTTE, v. STATE, 617 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . . § 831.02, Fla.Stat. (1991). . Art. II, § 3, Fla. Const. . . .

BOGUSH, v. STATE, 597 So. 2d 420 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . 13, 1990, the state charged the appellant with uttering a forged instrument in violation of section 831.02 . . .

SALZMAN, v. STATE, 591 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . .-019 and 831.02, Fla.Stat. (1989). Dixon v. . . .

BROUSSEAU, v. STATE, 590 So. 2d 997 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . . § 831.02, Fla.Stat. (1989). . § 810.02(2), Fla.Stat. (1989). . § 812.019(1), Fla.Stat. (1989). . § . . .

WEAVER, v. STATE, 587 So. 2d 654 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . . § 831.02, Fla.Stat. (1989). . § 812.019(1), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . . .

ISREAL, v. STATE, 573 So. 2d 975 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Appellant was convicted on two counts of uttering forged instruments in violation of section 831.02, . . .

HENDERSON, v. STATE, 572 So. 2d 972 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . instrument ... knowing the same to be ... forged ..., with intent to injure or defraud any person_” § 831.02 . . .

R. DONOVAN, v. STATE, 572 So. 2d 522 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Eleven counts of uttering a false instrument, section 831.02, Florida Statutes (1987): 5 years probation . . . The same is true of uttering false instruments, section 831.02, Florida Statutes (1987), which also must . . .

DIXON, v. STATE, 559 So. 2d 354 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Appellant was convicted and sentenced for uttering a forged instrument in violation of Section 831.02 . . . Yet because the proscribed offenses of sections 831.02 and 812.019 include the attempt to commit the . . . The offense of uttering a forged instrument in violation of section 831.02 is fully shown by proof of . . .

GLASS, v. STATE, 556 So. 2d 465 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . to a second information charging four counts of uttering a forged instrument in violation of section 831.02 . . . See sections 831.02, 775.082(3)(d), Florida Statutes (1987). . . .

GREGORY, v. STATE, 554 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . not waived, this argument has no merit because the statutory elements of the two offenses (§§ 831.01, 831.02 . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 553 So. 2d 365 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Forgery; section 831.01, Florida Statutes (1987); uttering a false or forged instrument, section 831.02 . . .

KINMAN, v. STATE, 550 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . . § 831.02, Fla.Stat. (1987) (uttering a false or forged instrument); § 831.01, Fla.Stat. (1987) (forgery . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES, 543 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 1989)

. . . willfully Negligent treatment of child — 827.05 Forgery — 831.01 None Attempt Uttering forged instrument — 831.02 . . .

STATE v. FRIEDMAN,, 533 So. 2d 309 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . conclude that the act charged, uttering an altered private academic transcript, does not violate section 831.02 . . . In an amended information the state charged appellee with violating section 831.02, Florida Statutes, . . . tran-script_” The court dismissed this information upon appellee’s motion, determining that section 831.02 . . . Since section 831.02 is a penal statute, it must give clear notice of the acts it proscribes and should . . . We agree with the trial court that section 831.02 proscribes uttering only such records and documents . . .

B. HARRIS, v. STATE, 525 So. 2d 449 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . . § 831.02, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

STATE v. L. BOOK,, 523 So. 2d 636 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Pursuant to Section 831.02, Florida Statutes (1985), the elements of the offense of uttering a false . . .

THOMAS, v. STATE, 513 So. 2d 163 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . See § 831.02, Fla.Stat. (1983). . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR RE STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS- CRIMINAL, 508 So. 2d 1221 (Fla. 1987)

. . . willfully Negligent treatment of child— 827.05 Forgery — 831.01 None Attempt Uttering forged instrument — 831.02 . . .

E. GRANDISON, v. STATE, 506 So. 2d 74 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . §§ 812.13(2)(c), 831.01, 831.02, Fla.Stat. (1985). . Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). .See also Byrd v. . . .

BOGAN, v. STATE, 502 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . the appellant was charged by information with uttering a forged instrument in violation of section 831.02 . . .

L. BEXLEY, v. STATE, 490 So. 2d 226 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . five separate informations with nine counts of uttering a forged instrument in violation of section 831.02 . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 490 So. 2d 182 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . two counts of forgery, and two counts of uttering forged money orders, sections 812.014, 831.01 and 831.02 . . .

BODINE, v. STATE, 452 So. 2d 957 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . . § 831.02, Fla.Stat. (1981). . § 790.23, Fla.Stat. (1983). . See Duggar v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. MIRELES, FR XXX- XX- XXXX, 17 M.J. 781 (A.F.C.M.R. 1983)

. . . State, 355 So.2d 817 (Fla.App.1978); interpreting F.S. 811.021, 831.01, 831.02, 833.04; Anderson v. . . .

DAVIS, v. STATE, 438 So. 2d 973 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . James Davis, was arrested and later charged with uttering a forged instrument in violation of section 831.02 . . .

BRADFORD, v. STATE, 435 So. 2d 962 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Section 831.02, Florida Statutes (1981). . . . .

D. W. a v. STATE, 428 So. 2d 363 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . for the offenses of: (1) forgery [§ 831.01, Fla.Stat. (1981)]; (2) uttering a forged instrument [§ 831.02 . . .

BROWN, v. STATE, 426 So. 2d 76 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . . § 831.02, Fla.Stat. (1979). . § 812.014, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . . .

STATE v. LOVE,, 415 So. 2d 113 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . question of whether the defendant knew that he was uttering a forged check, thus violating Section 831.02 . . .

W. ANDERSON, a k a v. STATE, 415 So. 2d 49 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Appellant was charged with violating sections 817.61 (fraudulent use of a credit card) and 831.02 (uttering . . .

LOWERY, v. STATE, 402 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Lowery a/k/a Arthur Moore was tried and convicted of uttering a forged check in violation of section 831.02 . . .

CAPO, v. STATE, 397 So. 2d 409 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Appellant was charged with uttering a forged instrument in violation of section 831.02, Florida Statutes . . .

LOVETT, Jr. v. STATE OF FLORIDA,, 627 F.2d 706 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . . § 831.02. . . .

RUMMEL v. ESTELLE, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, 445 U.S. 263 (U.S. 1980)

. . . . §§ 831.01, 831.02 (1965) (fine or up to 10 years); Ga. . . .

STATE v. M. SMITH,, 368 So. 2d 634 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . State, 330 So.2d 246 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); § 831.02, Fla.Stat. (1969). BOARDMAN, Acting C. . . .

SHABAZZ, a k a X. Jr. v. STATE, 367 So. 2d 694 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . That offense is a third degree felony, § 831.02, Fla.Stat. (1975), punishable by a maximum prison sentence . . .

R. JALBERT, v. STATE, 366 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . At a non-jury trial, the defendant was convicted of uttering a forged instrument in violation of § 831.02 . . . forgery (a) because a motor vehicle certificate of title is not an instrument covered by §§ 831.01 and 831.02 . . . charges because he did not possess the “specific intent” to defraud required under both § 319.33(2) and § 831.02 . . . specific” statute provided for a lesser penalty than the general one, violations of both § 319.33 and § 831.02 . . .

DEES, v. STATE, 357 So. 2d 491 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . defendant seeks review of his conviction for uttering a forged instrument, viz: a check, in violation of § 831.02 . . .

L. MULDER, v. STATE, 356 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . pleading guilty to a charge of uttering a forged instrument, a third degree felony proscribed by Section 831.02 . . .

W. ADAMS, Jr. v. STATE, 356 So. 2d 346 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Similarly, neither Section 831.02, Florida Statutes (1971), prohibiting the commission of forgery, nor . . .

K. BRONSTEIN, v. STATE, 355 So. 2d 817 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . grand larceny, forgery and uttering a forged instrument, in violation of Sections 811.021, 831.01 and 831.02 . . .

STATE v. LA POINTE, A., 345 So. 2d 362 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . intent to injure and defraud the National Football League and other persons, in violation of Section 831.02 . . . 831.01 of the forgery statute, and therefor that the uttering thereof was not an offense under Section 831.02 . . . utterance of which with intent to injure or defraud any person would constitute an offense of Section 831.02 . . .

STATE v. CHARLES,, 341 So. 2d 539 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . in-formations with forgery and uttering a forged instrument contrary to Florida Statutes, Sections 831.01 and 831.02 . . .

KING, v. STATE, 339 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 1976)

. . . defendant below, was charged with and convicted of uttering a forged instrument as defined by F.S. 831.02 . . .

SILVESTRI, v. STATE, 332 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . . § 831.02. . . .

LAWRENCE, v. STATE, 330 So. 2d 160 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . 831.01, Florida Statutes, and the second count charging uttering a forged instrument in violation of § 831.02 . . .

E. WEBSTER, v. STATE, 313 So. 2d 432 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . . § 831.02 (1973). . . .

S. OJA, v. STATE, 292 So. 2d 71 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . and sentence based upon a jury verdict of guilty of uttering a forged check in violation of F.S., § 831.02 . . .

McCLENDON, v. STATE, 290 So. 2d 77 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . . § 831.02 F.S.A., based upon a jury verdict. . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 278 So. 2d 643 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . then and there well knowing the same to be false, forged or counterfeit as aforesaid, contrary to F.S. 831.02 . . . unlawfully and feloniously utter and publish as true a certain forged bank check, etc., contrary to F.S. § 831.02 . . . , F.S.A., whose terms provide: “831.02 Uttering forged instruments.— Whoever utters and publishes as . . .

RAPP, v. STATE, 274 So. 2d 18 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . . § 831.02 (1971), F.S.A., tried and convicted by a jury, adjudged guilty by he court and sentence imposed . . .

ROBINSON, v. STATE, 266 So. 2d 693 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . Defendant was convicted and sentenced for violation of F.S. 831.02, F.S.A., Laws of 1969, this outlining . . . prosecutor misstated on several occasions that the case involved the uttering of a forged instrument, F.S. 831.02 . . . allowed to amend the information over the defendant’s objection to charge the offense contained in F.S. 831.02 . . .

STATE v. McCURDY,, 257 So. 2d 92 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . . § 831.02, F.S.A. provides inter alia that— “Whoever utters ... as true a . forged . . . writing mentioned . . . 220, 83 So. 922, in interpreting into plain English the rather prolix language of said §§ 831.01 and 831.02 . . . In uttering a forged instrument [now F.S. § 831.02, F.S.A.] the offense consists in the knowledge on . . . the Judge deemed to be exclusive, even as against the general forgery statutes, F.S. §§ 831.01 and 831.02 . . .

PATE, v. STATE, 256 So. 2d 223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . The information is drawn under Section 831.02, Florida Statutes, 1967, F.S.A. . . . The material portion of said Section 831.02, F.S., 1967, F.S.A., is as follows: “Whoever utters and publishes . . .

LAMPLEY, v. STATE, 214 So. 2d 515 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . Regarding the offense of uttering a forged check, the statute (§ 831.02 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.), prescribing . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR, v. J. GOLD,, 203 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 1967)

. . . admitted the forgery as defined by F.S. 831.01, F.S.A., uttering a forged instrument as defined by F.S. 831.02 . . .

PETERSON, v. STATE, 200 So. 2d 829 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . uttering certain bank checks in the amount of $68.50 each in two counts in violation of Section 831.01 and 831.02 . . .

STATE v. PETERSON,, 192 So. 2d 293 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . The information purports to charge the defendant with uttering a forged instrument (in violation of § 831.02 . . .

FOLK v. STATE, 192 So. 2d 44 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . (Fla.Stat.196S, § 831.02, F.S.A.) appellant Liquari was convicted of forgery (Fla.Stat., § 831.01, F.S . . . Section “831.02 Uttering forged instruments. — Whoever utters and publishes as true a false, forged or . . .

MAURA, v. STATE, 181 So. 2d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Florida, of uttering a forged instrument in violation of section 831.02 . . .

UNITED STATES R. NOLL, v. M. FAY,, 219 F. Supp. 262 (S.D.N.Y. 1963)

. . . Ch. 831, § 831.02 (1941). . . . It is so ordered. . § 831.02 of the 1941 Florida Statutes, F.S.A., provides: “Uttering forged instruments . . .

C. THOMAS, v. H. G. COCHRAN, Jr., 133 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 1961)

. . . Secs. 34.01 (4), 36.01 (4) and 831.02, Florida Statutes 1959, F.S.A., and Secs. 831.01 and 811.021, supra . . .

WOOD, v. H. G. COCHRAN, Jr., 118 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 1960)

. . . Forgery and uttering a forged instrument are condemned by Sections 831.01 and 831.02, Florida Statutes . . . year on each count running consecutively was well within th£ maximum allowed by Sections 831.01 and 831.02 . . .

BRADLEY, v. H. G. COCHRAN, Jr., 117 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1960)

. . . . §§ 831.01, 831.02. Respondent does not assault the validity of that statute. . . .

MOTT, v. H. G. COCHRAN, Jr., 117 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 1960)

. . . It was this statute which amended Sections 831.01 and 831.02, Florida Statutes, by providing in substance . . .

CLARK, v. STATE, 114 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)

. . . appellant was indicted and of which he was convicted, is declared to be a crime in this state by Section 831.02 . . .

In ESTATE WATKINS, CRAWFORD, v. T. WATKINS,, 75 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 1954)

. . . And section 831.02 provides, in effect, that whoever utters and publishes as true a false, forged or . . .

NORWOOD v. MAYO,, 74 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 1954)

. . . Sections 831.01 and 831.02 respectively. . . .