|
|
The 2025 Florida Statutes
|
|
|
|
|
F.S. 948.30948.30 Additional terms and conditions of probation or community control for certain sex offenses.—Conditions imposed pursuant to this section do not require oral pronouncement at the time of sentencing and shall be considered standard conditions of probation or community control for offenders specified in this section.(1) Effective for probationers or community controllees whose crime was committed on or after October 1, 1995, and who are placed under supervision for a violation of chapter 794, s. 800.04, s. 827.071, s. 847.0135(5), or s. 847.0145, or whose crime was committed on or after July 1, 2021, and who are placed under supervision for a violation of s. 787.06(3)(b), (d), (f), or (g), or whose crime was committed on or after July 1, 2023, and who are placed under supervision for attempting, soliciting, or conspiring to commit a violation of s. 787.06(3)(b), (d), (f), or (g); chapter 794; s. 800.04; s. 827.071; s. 847.0135(5); or s. 847.0145, the court must impose the following conditions in addition to all other standard and special conditions imposed:(a) A mandatory curfew from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. The court may designate another 8-hour period if the offender’s employment precludes the above specified time, and the alternative is recommended by the Department of Corrections. If the court determines that imposing a curfew would endanger the victim, the court may consider alternative sanctions. (b) If the victim was under the age of 18, a prohibition on living within 1,000 feet of a school, child care facility, park, playground, or other place where children regularly congregate, as prescribed by the court. The 1,000-foot distance shall be measured in a straight line from the offender’s place of residence to the nearest boundary line of the school, child care facility, park, playground, or other place where children congregate. The distance may not be measured by a pedestrian route or automobile route. A probationer or community controllee who is subject to this paragraph may not be forced to relocate and does not violate his or her probation or community control if he or she is living in a residence that meets the requirements of this paragraph and a school, child care facility, park, playground, or other place where children regularly congregate is subsequently established within 1,000 feet of his or her residence. (c) Active participation in and successful completion of a sex offender treatment program with qualified practitioners specifically trained to treat sex offenders, at the probationer’s or community controllee’s own expense. If a qualified practitioner is not available within a 50-mile radius of the probationer’s or community controllee’s residence, the offender shall participate in other appropriate therapy. (d) A prohibition on any contact with the victim, directly or indirectly, including through a third person, unless approved by the victim, a qualified practitioner in the sexual offender treatment program, and the sentencing court. (e) If the victim was under the age of 18, a prohibition on contact with a child under the age of 18 except as provided in this paragraph. The court may approve supervised contact with a child under the age of 18 if the approval is based upon a recommendation for contact issued by a qualified practitioner who is basing the recommendation on a risk assessment. Further, the sex offender must be currently enrolled in or have successfully completed a sex offender therapy program. The court may not grant supervised contact with a child if the contact is not recommended by a qualified practitioner and may deny supervised contact with a child at any time. When considering whether to approve supervised contact with a child, the court must review and consider the following:1. A risk assessment completed by a qualified practitioner. The qualified practitioner must prepare a written report that must include the findings of the assessment and address each of the following components:a. The sex offender’s current legal status; b. The sex offender’s history of adult charges with apparent sexual motivation; c. The sex offender’s history of adult charges without apparent sexual motivation; d. The sex offender’s history of juvenile charges, whenever available; e. The sex offender’s offender treatment history, including consultations with the sex offender’s treating, or most recent treating, therapist; f. The sex offender’s current mental status; g. The sex offender’s mental health and substance abuse treatment history as provided by the Department of Corrections; h. The sex offender’s personal, social, educational, and work history; i. The results of current psychological testing of the sex offender if determined necessary by the qualified practitioner; j. A description of the proposed contact, including the location, frequency, duration, and supervisory arrangement; k. The child’s preference and relative comfort level with the proposed contact, when age appropriate; l. The parent’s or legal guardian’s preference regarding the proposed contact; and m. The qualified practitioner’s opinion, along with the basis for that opinion, as to whether the proposed contact would likely pose significant risk of emotional or physical harm to the child. The written report of the assessment must be given to the court; 2. A recommendation made as a part of the risk assessment report as to whether supervised contact with the child should be approved; 3. A written consent signed by the child’s parent or legal guardian, if the parent or legal guardian is not the sex offender, agreeing to the sex offender having supervised contact with the child after receiving full disclosure of the sex offender’s present legal status, past criminal history, and the results of the risk assessment. The court may not approve contact with the child if the parent or legal guardian refuses to give written consent for supervised contact; 4. A safety plan prepared by the qualified practitioner, who provides treatment to the offender, in collaboration with the sex offender, the child’s parent or legal guardian, if the parent or legal guardian is not the sex offender, and the child, when age appropriate, which details the acceptable conditions of contact between the sex offender and the child. The safety plan must be reviewed and approved by the court; and 5. Evidence that the child’s parent or legal guardian understands the need for and agrees to the safety plan and has agreed to provide, or to designate another adult to provide, constant supervision any time the child is in contact with the offender. The court may not appoint a person to conduct a risk assessment and may not accept a risk assessment from a person who has not demonstrated to the court that he or she has met the requirements of a qualified practitioner as defined in this section. (f) If the victim was under age 18, a prohibition on working for pay or as a volunteer at any place where children regularly congregate, including, but not limited to, schools, child care facilities, parks, playgrounds, pet stores, libraries, zoos, theme parks, and malls. (g) Unless otherwise indicated in the treatment plan provided by a qualified practitioner in the sexual offender treatment program, a prohibition on viewing, accessing, owning, or possessing any obscene, pornographic, or sexually stimulating visual or auditory material, including telephone, electronic media, computer programs, or computer services that are relevant to the offender’s deviant behavior pattern. (h) Effective for probationers and community controllees whose crime is committed on or after July 1, 2005, a prohibition on accessing the Internet or other computer services until a qualified practitioner in the offender’s sex offender treatment program, after a risk assessment is completed, approves and implements a safety plan for the offender’s accessing or using the Internet or other computer services. (i) A requirement that the probationer or community controllee must submit a specimen of blood or other approved biological specimen to the Department of Law Enforcement to be registered with the DNA data bank. (j) A requirement that the probationer or community controllee make restitution to the victim, as ordered by the court under s. 775.089, for all necessary medical and related professional services relating to physical, psychiatric, and psychological care. (k) Submission to a warrantless search by the community control or probation officer of the probationer’s or community controllee’s person, residence, or vehicle. (2) Effective for a probationer or community controllee whose crime was committed on or after October 1, 1997, and who is placed on community control or sex offender probation for a violation of chapter 794, s. 800.04, s. 827.071, s. 847.0135(5), or s. 847.0145, or whose crime was committed on or after July 1, 2021, and who is placed on community control or sex offender probation for a violation of s. 787.06(3)(b), (d), (f), or (g), or whose crime was committed on or after July 1, 2023, and who is placed on community control or sex offender probation for attempting, soliciting, or conspiring to commit a violation of s. 787.06(3)(b), (d), (f), or (g); chapter 794; s. 800.04; s. 827.071; s. 847.0135(5); or s. 847.0145, in addition to any other provision of this section, the court must impose the following conditions of probation or community control:(a) As part of a treatment program, participation at least annually in polygraph examinations to obtain information necessary for risk management and treatment and to reduce the sex offender’s denial mechanisms. A polygraph examination must be conducted by a polygrapher who is a member of a national or state polygraph association and who is certified as a postconviction sex offender polygrapher, where available, and shall be paid for by the probationer or community controllee. The results of the polygraph examination shall be provided to the probationer’s or community controllee’s probation officer and qualified practitioner and shall not be used as evidence in court to prove that a violation of community supervision has occurred. (b) Maintenance of a driving log and a prohibition against driving a motor vehicle alone without the prior approval of the supervising officer. (c) A prohibition against obtaining or using a post office box without the prior approval of the supervising officer. (d) If there was sexual contact, a submission to, at the probationer’s or community controllee’s expense, an HIV test with the results to be released to the victim or the victim’s parent or guardian. (e) Electronic monitoring when deemed necessary by the community control or probation officer and his or her supervisor, and ordered by the court at the recommendation of the Department of Corrections. (3) Effective for a probationer or community controllee whose crime was committed on or after September 1, 2005, and who:(a) Is placed on probation or community control for a violation of chapter 794; s. 800.04(4), (5), or (6); s. 827.071; or s. 847.0145, or is placed on probation or community control on or after July 1, 2023, for attempting, soliciting, or conspiring to commit a violation of chapter 794; s. 800.04(4), (5), or (6); s. 827.071; or s. 847.0145, and the unlawful sexual activity involved a victim 15 years of age or younger and the offender is 18 years of age or older; (b) Is designated a sexual predator pursuant to s. 775.21; or (c) Has previously been convicted of a violation of chapter 794; s. 800.04(4), (5), or (6); s. 827.071; or s. 847.0145 and the unlawful sexual activity involved a victim 15 years of age or younger and the offender is 18 years of age or older, the court must order, in addition to any other provision of this section, mandatory electronic monitoring as a condition of the probation or community control supervision. (4) In addition to all other conditions imposed, for a probationer or community controllee who is subject to supervision for a crime that was committed on or after May 26, 2010, and who has been convicted at any time of committing, or attempting, soliciting, or conspiring to commit, any of the criminal offenses listed in s. 943.0435(1)(h)1.a.(I), or a similar offense in another jurisdiction, against a victim who was under the age of 18 at the time of the offense; if the offender has not received a pardon for any felony or similar law of another jurisdiction necessary for the operation of this subsection, if a conviction of a felony or similar law of another jurisdiction necessary for the operation of this subsection has not been set aside in any postconviction proceeding, or if the offender has not been removed from the requirement to register as a sexual offender or sexual predator pursuant to s. 943.04354, the court must impose the following conditions:(a) A prohibition on visiting schools, child care facilities, parks, and playgrounds, without prior approval from the offender’s supervising officer. The court may also designate additional locations to protect a victim. The prohibition ordered under this paragraph does not prohibit the offender from visiting a school, child care facility, park, or playground for the sole purpose of attending a religious service as defined in s. 775.0861 or picking up or dropping off the offender’s children or grandchildren at a child care facility or school. (b) A prohibition on distributing candy or other items to children on Halloween; wearing a Santa Claus costume, or other costume to appeal to children, on or preceding Christmas; wearing an Easter Bunny costume, or other costume to appeal to children, on or preceding Easter; entertaining at children’s parties; or wearing a clown costume; without prior approval from the court. (5) Effective for a probationer or community controllee whose crime was committed on or after October 1, 2014, and who is placed on probation or community control for a violation of chapter 794, s. 800.04, s. 827.071, s. 847.0135(5), or s. 847.0145, or whose crime was committed on or after July 1, 2023, and who is placed on probation or community control for attempting, soliciting, or conspiring to commit a violation of chapter 794, s. 800.04, s. 827.071, s. 847.0135(5), or s. 847.0145, in addition to all other conditions imposed, the court must impose a condition prohibiting the probationer or community controllee from viewing, accessing, owning, or possessing any obscene, pornographic, or sexually stimulating visual or auditory material unless otherwise indicated in the treatment plan provided by a qualified practitioner in the sexual offender treatment program. Visual or auditory material includes, but is not limited to, telephone, electronic media, computer programs, and computer services. History.—s. 59, ch. 95-283; s. 6, ch. 96-409; s. 3, ch. 97-308; s. 14, ch. 98-81; s. 13, ch. 99-201; s. 3, ch. 2000-246; s. 1, ch. 2003-18; s. 1, ch. 2003-63; s. 18, ch. 2004-373; s. 151, ch. 2005-2; s. 20, ch. 2005-28; s. 4, ch. 2005-67; s. 31, ch. 2008-172; ss. 12, 18, ch. 2010-92; s. 15, ch. 2014-4; s. 60, ch. 2016-24; s. 13, ch. 2016-104; s. 4, ch. 2021-189; s. 4, ch. 2023-146; ss. 51, 79, ch. 2025-156. Note.—Former s. 948.03(5).
| |
Annotations, Discussions, Cases:
Cases Citing Statute 948.30
Total Results: 68
991 So. 2d 803, 2008 WL 2678449
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2008 | Docket: 1400494
Cited 122 times | Published
NOTES
[1] This statute has been renumbered as section 948.30(1)(g), Florida Statutes (2007) ("Unless otherwise
43 So. 3d 738, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9124, 2010 WL 2507317
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2010 | Docket: 1927081
Cited 11 times | Published
monitoring if you meet the conditions set forth in F.S. 948.30(3). If electronically monitored you shall wear
979 So. 2d 921, 2008 WL 794662
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2008 | Docket: 1407823
Cited 8 times | Published
treatment, we must review the applicable statutes. Section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2007), requires the imposition
2 So. 3d 362, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 19373, 2008 WL 5352103
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 2008 | Docket: 1138730
Cited 7 times | Published
So.2d 1257, 1259 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)). Under section 948.30, Florida Statutes, the trial court was required
980 So. 2d 1108, 2008 WL 373234
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2008 | Docket: 1016091
Cited 7 times | Published
which those statutory provisions are imposed. See § 948.30(1), Fla. Stat.; Muzzo v. State, 773 So.2d 1271
960 So. 2d 797, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9547, 2007 WL 1753560
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2007 | Docket: 1407046
Cited 6 times | Published
requirements under section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2006). Under section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2006)
896 So. 2d 868, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2216, 2005 WL 430356
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2005 | Docket: 1283104
Cited 6 times | Published
authorizing the Department to pay for an interpreter. Section 948.30(1)(c), Florida Statutes (2004) provides as
889 So. 2d 823, 2004 WL 2923221
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2004 | Docket: 1742804
Cited 5 times | Published
completion of a sexual offender treatment program. See § 948.30(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (2004) (previously codified
217 So. 3d 215, 2017 WL 1401463, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5363
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2017 | Docket: 60265671
Cited 4 times | Published
conditions had been imposed mandatorily pursuant to section 948.30” in a situation where they were not mandatory
965 So. 2d 270, 2007 WL 2682153
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2007 | Docket: 1509194
Cited 4 times | Published
statutorily mandated condition set forth in section 948.30(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2006), requiring the
82 So. 3d 1217, 2012 WL 987400, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4595
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2012 | Docket: 60306066
Cited 3 times | Published
Florida Supreme Court interpreted what is now section 948.30(1) (g), Florida Statutes (2011),1 *1220which
73 So. 3d 358, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17373, 2011 WL 5169972
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2011 | Docket: 2354788
Cited 3 times | Published
made the requisite statutory findings under section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2008), when it imposed electronic
8 So. 3d 385, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1931, 2009 WL 529431
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2009 | Docket: 1222789
Cited 3 times | Published
mandatory electronic monitoring, pursuant to Section 948.30(3), Florida Statutes. We reverse.
On September
968 So. 2d 1032, 2007 WL 3033401
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2007 | Docket: 2531107
Cited 3 times | Published
condition of the defendant's probation pursuant to section 948.30. On appeal, the Third District held that imposition
117 So. 3d 484, 2013 WL 3814313, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11582
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2013 | Docket: 60232695
Cited 2 times | Published
The statute has been amended and renumbered, see § 948.30(l)(g), Fla. Stat. (2012), but the changes have
96 So. 3d 1063, 2012 WL 3822191, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14856
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2012 | Docket: 60311412
Cited 2 times | Published
the statute in a manner not relevant here. See § 948.30(l)(g), Fla. Stat. (2004).
68 So. 3d 407, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14089, 2011 WL 3903112
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2011 | Docket: 60302275
Cited 2 times | Published
were committed on or after September 1, 2005. See § 948.30(3), Fla. Stat. (2005). If the mandatory electronic
974 So. 2d 1203, 2008 WL 482298
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2008 | Docket: 1717800
Cited 2 times | Published
Specifically, the Harroll court recognized that where section 948.30 requires a probationer to be electronically
993 So. 2d 998, 2007 WL 3317518
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2007 | Docket: 904145
Cited 2 times | Published
monitoring under the Jessica Lunsford Act (the Act), section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2006). Burrell argues that
946 So. 2d 1155, 2006 WL 3740612
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2006 | Docket: 1771256
Cited 2 times | Published
This statute has been renumbered and is now section 948.30(1)(g), Florida Statutes (2006).
[3] It is
946 So. 2d 1155, 2006 WL 3740612
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2006 | Docket: 1771256
Cited 2 times | Published
This statute has been renumbered and is now section 948.30(1)(g), Florida Statutes (2006).
[3] It is
202 So. 3d 28, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 422, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2244
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2016 | Docket: 4469722
Cited 1 times | Published
complete a sex offender treatment
program. See § 948.30(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (2011). Neither “active participation”
200 So. 3d 137, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8060, 2016 WL 3030829
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2016 | Docket: 60294185
Cited 1 times | Published
imposition of sex offender probation pursuant to section 948.30, Florida Statutes, is improper because his
169 So. 3d 1286, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11654, 2015 WL 4622738
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2015 | Docket: 60248855
Cited 1 times | Published
service was not an enumerated offense under section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2012). The trial court granted
161 So. 3d 403, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2365, 2014 WL 656756
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2014 | Docket: 60247128
Cited 1 times | Published
battery in violation of section 800.04(4)(a), section 948.30’s provisions of sex offender probation were
118 So. 3d 999, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13015, 2013 WL 4436953
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2013 | Docket: 60233526
Cited 1 times | Published
probation for other offenses where appropriate.
Section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2011), establishes the conditions
95 So. 3d 436, 2012 WL 3329213, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13544
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2012 | Docket: 60311242
Cited 1 times | Published
and the Third District have acknowledged that section 948.30(3) compels electronic monitoring as a mandatory
65 So. 3d 104, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9883, 2011 WL 2493653
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 2011 | Docket: 60301608
Cited 1 times | Published
imposition of sex offender conditions as found in section 948.30, Florida Statutes. He argues that those conditions
979 So. 2d 1060, 2008 WL 782745
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2008 | Docket: 1714044
Cited 1 times | Published
him as one during the original sentencing.
Section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2006), a portion of the
954 So. 2d 659, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4961, 2007 WL 1009915
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2007 | Docket: 1164810
Cited 1 times | Published
fails to give an address acceptable pursuant to § 948.30(1)(b) Fla. Stat. (2005), at the time of a scheduled
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2025 | Docket: 69864381
Published
offender probation pursuant to the
requirements in section 948.30 of the Florida Statutes, registration as a
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2024 | Docket: 69455577
Published
program approved and implemented a safety plan. See
§ 948.30(1)(h), Fla. Stat.
But just six months after
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2022 | Docket: 63369340
Published
as the sexual battery occurred in 1991 and section
948.30, Florida Statutes, the statute which sets forth
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2019 | Docket: 16090303
Published
electronic monitoring under the 2006 version of section
948.30(2)(e), Florida Statutes (effective Jan. 1,
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2019 | Docket: 15960205
Published
MEDIA[.]
Special condition 27 is authorized by section 948.30(1)(h), Florida Statutes (2016),
except that
270 So. 3d 549
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2019 | Docket: 15071476
Published
little background is helpful to understand why. Section 948.30, Florida
Statutes, has long required that
267 So. 3d 437
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2019 | Docket: 14757617
Published
Because the trial court failed
to comply with section 948.30(e), Florida Statutes, it lacked the authority
269 So. 3d 580
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2019 | Docket: 14533667
Published
pertinent facts are straightforward and undisputed.
Section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2014), sets forth a list
254 So. 3d 1137
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2018 | Docket: 7819893
Published
electronic monitoring was mandatory pursuant to section 948.30(3)(c), Florida
Statutes (2017), which reads:
254 So. 3d 614
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2018 | Docket: 7738808
Published
probation pursuant
to section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2011). Section 948.30 requires the trial court
251 So. 3d 307
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2018 | Docket: 7428858
Published
sex offender probation is mandatory under section
948.30(1), Florida Statutes (2012). Special conditions
245 So. 3d 643
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 7, 2018 | Docket: 7080075
Published
"sex offender probation" does not reference section 948.30 :
"Sex offender probation" or "sex offender
241 So. 3d 908
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2018 | Docket: 6304677
Published
were statutorily
mandatory for count three. See § 948.30, Fla. Stat. (2013).
On September
216 So. 3d 780, 2017 WL 1788016, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6366
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 2017 | Docket: 6061260
Published
of any of the enumerated felonies listed in section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2012).
The postconviction
200 So. 3d 47, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 319, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 1428, 2016 WL 4168765
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2016 | Docket: 4108654
Published
probation of “sex offender treatment” under section 948.30(1), Florida Statutes (2008), when the defendant
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2016 | Docket: 4416257
Published
to sex offender therapy
imposed pursuant to section 948.30(1)(c), Florida Statutes (2008). Id. at 1000
200 So. 3d 137
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 23, 2016 | Docket: 3069654
Published
titled “Special Conditions
for Sex Offenders per F.S. 948.30” in which he agreed to specific conditions of
190 So. 3d 162, 2016 WL 1385927, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5425
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2016 | Docket: 3054142
Published
probation with all the standard conditions” under section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2012).. The trial court
163 So. 3d 683, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6312, 2015 WL 1930312
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2015 | Docket: 2679369
Published
convicted of any of the sex offenses specified in section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2013), which imposes standard
162 So. 3d 1128, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5849
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2015 | Docket: 2679382
Published
condition in section 948.03. He also cites section 948.30(l)(k), Florida Statutes (2005), which authorizes
157 So. 3d 559
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2015 | Docket: 2638637
Published
948.03, Florida Statutes (2013).
*
Section 948.30 provides that the court “must impose” certain
157 So. 3d 503, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1948, 2015 WL 630202
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 2015 | Docket: 2634273
Published
children regularly congregate.
See
§ 948.30(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2013). Another condition imposed
149 So. 3d 725, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17293, 2014 WL 5392962
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2014 | Docket: 60243983
Published
issue on appeal turns on the construction of section 948.30(1), Florida Statutes (2013), which, in pertinent
161 So. 3d 561, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17287, 2014 WL 5853778
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2014 | Docket: 60247205
Published
complete a sex offender treatment program. See § 948.30(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (2012).4
In the instant case
161 So. 3d 561, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17287, 2014 WL 5853778
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2014 | Docket: 60247205
Published
complete a sex offender treatment program. See § 948.30(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (2012).4
In the instant case
151 So. 3d 23, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18901
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2014 | Docket: 1411210
Published
offenders such as appellee.
See generally
§ 948.30(1)(d), Fla. Stat. (2014). Yet, the Legislature
125 So. 3d 932, 2013 WL 2218106, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8133
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2013 | Docket: 60236123
Published
probation, which tracked the language of sub-section 948.30(l)(h), Florida Statutes (2005), prohibited
111 So. 3d 945, 2013 WL 1689033, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6482
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2013 | Docket: 60230921
Published
subject to probationary conditions set forth in section 948.30(1), Florida Statutes (2010), because his offenses
76 So. 3d 1014, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19192, 2011 WL 6003407
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 2011 | Docket: 60304139
Published
offender conditions 14 through 30” pursuant to section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2006). Davis appealed, raising
31 So. 3d 841, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2192, 2010 WL 624162
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 2010 | Docket: 391257
Published
So.3d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (holding that section 948.30(3), Florida Statutes, requiring a probationer
24 So. 3d 712, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20003, 2009 WL 4931665
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2009 | Docket: 1152037
Published
monitoring under the Jessica Lunsford Act, section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2007).[1] The court also
14 So. 3d 1291, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9532, 2009 WL 2004158
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2009 | Docket: 60241297
Published
2d 998, 999 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (finding that section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2006), did not apply where
13 So. 3d 127, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6918, 2009 WL 1532966
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2009 | Docket: 60237583
Published
probation without making a finding, pursuant to section 948.30(l)(g), Florida Statutes (2006), that the obscene
990 So. 2d 1191, 2008 WL 4265182
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 2008 | Docket: 1291946
Published
03(5)(a)2., Florida Statutes (2001) (currently section 948.30(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2008)), provides that
984 So. 2d 1269, 2008 WL 2550741
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2008 | Docket: 1685853
Published
to live with designated minors. I note that section 948.30(1)(e), Florida Statutes (2007), which was not
958 So. 2d 1000, 2007 WL 1518247
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2007 | Docket: 1414258
Published
violation of community supervision has occurred." § 948.30(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005); see also Cassamassima
948 So. 2d 962, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1973, 2007 WL 486011
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2007 | Docket: 64849154
Published
conditions of sex offender probation mandated by section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2005).1
Several days after
915 So. 2d 251, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18873, 2005 WL 3234450
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 2005 | Docket: 64841022
Published
recommend electronic monitoring pursuant to section 948.30(2)(e), Florida Statutes (2005). We affirm Melvin’s
