Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 775.21
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§775.21(6)SEX PREDATOR REGISTRATIONN
§775.21(6a)SEX PRED VIOLATIONRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 10313F · 3rd
§775.21(6a1)SEX PRED VIOLATIONSEX PRED FAIL TO REGISTER VEHICLE INFOF · 3rd
§775.21(6a1)SEX PRED VIOLATIONSEX PREDATOR FAIL TO REGISTER EMPLOYMENT INFOF · 3rd
§775.21(6a1)SEX PRED VIOLATIONSEX PRED FAIL TO REG EMAIL/INTERNET ID/PHONEF · 3rd
§775.21(6a1)SEX PRED VIOLATIONSEX PREDATOR FAIL TO REGISTER ADDRESS INFOF · 3rd
§775.21(6a1)SEX PRED VIOLATIONSEX PREDATOR FAIL TO PROVIDE IDENTITY REG REQF · 3rd
§775.21(6a1b)SEX PRED VIOLATIONSEX PRED FAIL TO REG RESIDE MOTOR VEH/VESSELF · 3rd
§775.21(6a1c)SEX PRED VIOLATIONSEX PRED FAIL REGISTER INFO W/ HIGHER ED INSTF · 3rd
§775.21(6a2)SEX PRED VIOLATIONSEX PREDATOR FAIL TO PROVIDE REG INFO TO FDLEF · 3rd
§775.21(6b)SEX PRED VIOLATIONFAIL TO REGISTER AS SEX PRED WHILE SUPERVISEDF · 3rd
§775.21(6e)SEX PRED VIOLATIONFAIL TO REGISTER AS SEX PRED NOT SUPERVISEDF · 3rd
§775.21(6f)SEX PRED VIOLATIONRENUMBERED. SEE REC# 6148F · 3rd
§775.21(6f)SEX PRED VIOLATIONSEX PREDATOR FAIL TO REPORT TO DHSMVF · 3rd
§775.21(6g)SEX PRED VIOLATIONRENUMBERED. SEE REC# 6149F · 2nd
§775.21(6g)SEX PRED VIOLATIONSEX PRED TRANSIENT FAIL TO REPORT EVERY 30DAYSF · 3rd
§775.21(6g)SEX PRED VIOLATIONSEX PRED FAIL TO REPORT ADDRESS OR NAME CHANGEF · 3rd
§775.21(6g1)SEX PRED VIOLATIONRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 10324F · 3rd
§775.21(6g2)SEX PRED VIOLATIONREMOVEDF · 3rd
§775.21(6g3)SEX PRED VIOLATIONRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 3938F · 2nd
§775.21(6g4)SEX PRED VIOLATIONRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 10325F · 3rd
§775.21(6g5b)SEX PRED VIOLATIONSEX PRED FAIL REG STATUS CHANGE HIGHER ED INSTF · 3rd
§775.21(6i)SEX PRED VIOLATIONSEX PREDATOR FAIL TO REPORT INTENT TO MOVEF · 3rd
§775.21(6j)SEX PRED VIOLATIONSEX PREDATOR FAIL TO REPORT INTENT TO REMAINF · 2nd
§775.21(8a)SEX PRED VIOLATIONSEX PREDATOR FAIL TO REGISTER QUARTERLYF · 3rd
§775.21(9)FAILURE TO APPEARERRORS W SECTION AND CODEF · 3rd
§775.21(10a)SEX PRED VIOLATIONREMOVEDF · 3rd
§775.21(10a)SEX PRED VIOLATIONREMOVEDF · 3rd
§775.21(10a)SEX PRED VIOLATIONREMOVEDF · 3rd
§775.21(10a)SEX PRED VIOLATIONREMOVEDF · 3rd
§775.21(10a)SEX PRED VIOLATIONREMOVEDF · 3rd
§775.21(10a)SEX PRED VIOLATIONREMOVEDF · 3rd
§775.21(10a)SEX PRED VIOLATIONRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 3939F · 3rd
§775.21(10a)SEX PRED VIOLATIONRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 10315F · 3rd
§775.21(10a)SEX PRED VIOLATIONRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 10316F · 3rd
§775.21(10a)SEX PRED VIOLATIONRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 10326F · 3rd
§775.21(10a)SEX PRED VIOLATIONRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 10327F · 3rd
§775.21(10a)FAIL TO REG AS SEX PREDSEX PRED FAIL TO RESPOND TO REGISTRATION REQF · 3rd
§775.21(10a)SEX PRED VIOLATIONSEX PREDATOR FAIL TO REGISTER/RENEW DL/ID CARDF · 3rd
§775.21(10a)SEX PRED VIOLATIONSEX PREDATOR FAIL TO COMPLY W REGISTRATION REQF · 3rd
§775.21(10b)SEX PRED WORK WHERE CHILDREN GATHERSEX PREDATOR WORKING WHERE CHILDREN CONGREGATEF · 3rd
§775.21(10c)INVADE PRIVACYRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 8538M · 1st
§775.21(10c)FORGERY OFRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 8540M · 1st
§775.21(10c)FORGERY OFRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 8539M · 1st
§775.21(10c)INVADE PRIVACYRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 8541M · 1st
§775.21(10c)FRAUDRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 8537M · 1st
§775.21(10d)FORGERY OFREMOVEDM · 1st
§775.21(10d)INVADE PRIVACYREMOVEDM · 1st
§775.21(10d)FRAUDMISUSE PUBLIC SEXUAL OFFENDER/PREDATOR INFOM · 1st
§775.21(10d)INVADE PRIVACYDISTR/PUBLISH FALSE INFO SEX OFFENDER/PREDATORM · 1st
§775.21(10d)FORGERY OFALTER PUBLIC RECORD SEX OFFENDER/PREDATOR INFOM · 1st
§775.21(10g1)SEX PRED VIOLATIONRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 10329F · 3rd
§775.21(10g1)OBSTRUCTFAIL TO NOTIFY LEO/WH INFO SEX PRED NONCOMPLYF · 3rd
§775.21(10g2)SEX PRED VIOLATIONRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 10330F · 3rd
§775.21(10g2)OBSTRUCTING JUSTICEASSIST/ATTEMPT OR HARBOR SEX PREDATORF · 3rd
§775.21(10g3)SEX PRED VIOLATIONRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 10331F · 3rd
§775.21(10g3)OBSTRUCTASSIST/ATTEMPT OR CONCEAL SEX PREDATORF · 3rd
§775.21(10g4)SEX PRED VIOLATIONRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 10332F · 3rd
§775.21(10g4)OBSTRUCTING JUSTICEPROVIDE FALSE INFO TO LEO ABOUT SEX PREDATORF · 3rd
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
265
cases (
23 in the last 5 years), 1996–2026 · leading case:
Collie v. State, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
Collie v. State, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
· cites it 74× “The result was a new, comprehensive version of The Florida Sexual Predator's Act, codified at section 775.21, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996).”
Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
· cites it 46× “Defendant, an individual who pled guilty to an offense which, pursuant to the FSPA requires that he be designated a "sexual predator," claims that the statute is violative of procedural due process and therefore unconstitutional. As further explained below, we find FSPA to be…”
State v. Robinson, 873 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 2004).
· cites it 45× “See § 775.21, Fla. Stat. (1997). In chapter 98-81, section 3, Laws of Florida, the Legislature added sections 787.”
Milks v. State, 894 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2005).
· cites it 36× “Brummer, Public Defender and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, FL, for Appellee.”
Therrien v. State, 914 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 2005).
· cites it 49× “We conclude that section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), does not authorize imposition of a sexual predator designation on a defendant based on a predicate offense that did not qualify the defendant for sexual predator status at the time of sentencing.”
Cabrera v. State, 884 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).
· cites it 29× “5th DCA 2003), that an erroneous designation as a sexual predator under section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2002), is a sentencing error that must be properly preserved for review.”
Cuevas v. State, 31 So. 3d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
· cites it 52× “Desiderio Cuevas appeals from a final order designating him a sexual predator under section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2006). The issue to be determined in this appeal is whether designation as a sexual predator may be ordered after a defendant has served his sentence and been…”
Therrien v. State, 859 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
· cites it 30× “This cause arises from an appeal of a post-judgment order designating Appellant as a sexual predator pursuant to section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), as amended effective October 1, 1998.”
In Re Stand. Jury Inst. in Crim. Cases No. 2007-4, 983 So. 2d 531 (Fla. 2008).
· cites it 29× “15(a)-(k) pertain to offenses involving the failure to register as a sexual predator, as defined in section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2007). New instruction 11.”
State v. J.M., 824 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 2002).
· cites it 27× “as a sexual predator, pursuant to section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), also known as “The Florida Sexual Predators Act” (“Predator Act”).”
In Re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Case-report No. 2015-05, 195 So. 3d 1088 (Fla. 2016).
· cites it 19× “To prove the crime of Failure by a Sexual Predator to Comply with Registration Requirements, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: Give la or Ibas applicable. 1. (Defendant) a.”
Saintelien v. State, 990 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 2008).
· cites it 11× “[5] We decided Robinson before the Legislature added subsections (4)(d) and (5)(a)(1) to section 775.21. See Ch. 2004-371, § 1, Laws of Fla.”
— 775.21(1)(c) — 1 case
— 775.21(10) — 4 cases
State v. Robinson, 873 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 2004).
“See § 775.21, Fla. Stat. (1997). In chapter 98-81, section 3, Laws of Florida, the Legislature added sections 787.”
Milks v. State, 894 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2005).
“Brummer, Public Defender and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, FL, for Appellee.”
— 775.21(10)(a) — 12 cases
Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
“Defendant, an individual who pled guilty to an offense which, pursuant to the FSPA requires that he be designated a "sexual predator," claims that the statute is violative of procedural due process and therefore unconstitutional. As further explained below, we find FSPA to be…”
— 775.21(10)(b) — 10 cases
Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
“Defendant, an individual who pled guilty to an offense which, pursuant to the FSPA requires that he be designated a "sexual predator," claims that the statute is violative of procedural due process and therefore unconstitutional. As further explained below, we find FSPA to be…”
Therrien v. State, 859 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
“This cause arises from an appeal of a post-judgment order designating Appellant as a sexual predator pursuant to section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), as amended effective October 1, 1998.”
Therrien v. State, 914 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 2005).
“We conclude that section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), does not authorize imposition of a sexual predator designation on a defendant based on a predicate offense that did not qualify the defendant for sexual predator status at the time of sentencing.”
Milks v. State, 894 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2005).
“Brummer, Public Defender and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, FL, for Appellee.”
— 775.21(10)(g) — 1 case
— 775.21(2) — 6 cases
— 775.21(2)(b) — 1 case
Collie v. State, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
“The result was a new, comprehensive version of The Florida Sexual Predator's Act, codified at section 775.21, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996).”
— 775.21(2)(c) — 10 cases
State v. J.M., 824 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 2002).
“as a sexual predator, pursuant to section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), also known as “The Florida Sexual Predators Act” (“Predator Act”).”
Therrien v. State, 859 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
“This cause arises from an appeal of a post-judgment order designating Appellant as a sexual predator pursuant to section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), as amended effective October 1, 1998.”
— 775.21(2)(d) — 2 cases
Collie v. State, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
“The result was a new, comprehensive version of The Florida Sexual Predator's Act, codified at section 775.21, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996).”
— 775.21(2)(e) — 5 cases
— 775.21(2)(f) — 2 cases
— 775.21(2)(g) — 1 case
— 775.21(2)(j) — 1 case
— 775.21(2)(m) — 1 case
— 775.21(3) — 12 cases
Collie v. State, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
“The result was a new, comprehensive version of The Florida Sexual Predator's Act, codified at section 775.21, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996).”
State v. Robinson, 873 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 2004).
“See § 775.21, Fla. Stat. (1997). In chapter 98-81, section 3, Laws of Florida, the Legislature added sections 787.”
— 775.21(3)(a) — 10 cases
Milks v. State, 894 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2005).
“Brummer, Public Defender and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, FL, for Appellee.”
Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
“Defendant, an individual who pled guilty to an offense which, pursuant to the FSPA requires that he be designated a "sexual predator," claims that the statute is violative of procedural due process and therefore unconstitutional. As further explained below, we find FSPA to be…”
Collie v. State, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
“The result was a new, comprehensive version of The Florida Sexual Predator's Act, codified at section 775.21, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996).”
— 775.21(3)(a)(b) — 1 case
Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
“Defendant, an individual who pled guilty to an offense which, pursuant to the FSPA requires that he be designated a "sexual predator," claims that the statute is violative of procedural due process and therefore unconstitutional. As further explained below, we find FSPA to be…”
— 775.21(3)(b) — 8 cases
Milks v. State, 894 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2005).
“Brummer, Public Defender and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, FL, for Appellee.”
Collie v. State, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
“The result was a new, comprehensive version of The Florida Sexual Predator's Act, codified at section 775.21, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996).”
Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
“Defendant, an individual who pled guilty to an offense which, pursuant to the FSPA requires that he be designated a "sexual predator," claims that the statute is violative of procedural due process and therefore unconstitutional. As further explained below, we find FSPA to be…”
Therrien v. State, 859 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
“This cause arises from an appeal of a post-judgment order designating Appellant as a sexual predator pursuant to section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), as amended effective October 1, 1998.”
— 775.21(3)(b)(3) — 1 case
— 775.21(3)(c) — 5 cases
— 775.21(3)(d) — 13 cases
Saintelien v. State, 990 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 2008).
“[5] We decided Robinson before the Legislature added subsections (4)(d) and (5)(a)(1) to section 775.21. See Ch. 2004-371, § 1, Laws of Fla.”
Cabrera v. State, 884 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).
“5th DCA 2003), that an erroneous designation as a sexual predator under section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2002), is a sentencing error that must be properly preserved for review.”
— 775.21(4) — 23 cases
Therrien v. State, 859 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
“This cause arises from an appeal of a post-judgment order designating Appellant as a sexual predator pursuant to section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), as amended effective October 1, 1998.”
Therrien v. State, 914 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 2005).
“We conclude that section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), does not authorize imposition of a sexual predator designation on a defendant based on a predicate offense that did not qualify the defendant for sexual predator status at the time of sentencing.”
Collie v. State, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
“The result was a new, comprehensive version of The Florida Sexual Predator's Act, codified at section 775.21, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996).”
— 775.21(4)(a) — 59 cases
Collie v. State, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
“The result was a new, comprehensive version of The Florida Sexual Predator's Act, codified at section 775.21, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996).”
Therrien v. State, 914 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 2005).
“We conclude that section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), does not authorize imposition of a sexual predator designation on a defendant based on a predicate offense that did not qualify the defendant for sexual predator status at the time of sentencing.”
Cuevas v. State, 31 So. 3d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
“Desiderio Cuevas appeals from a final order designating him a sexual predator under section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2006). The issue to be determined in this appeal is whether designation as a sexual predator may be ordered after a defendant has served his sentence and been…”
Therrien v. State, 859 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
“This cause arises from an appeal of a post-judgment order designating Appellant as a sexual predator pursuant to section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), as amended effective October 1, 1998.”
State v. J.M., 824 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 2002).
“as a sexual predator, pursuant to section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), also known as “The Florida Sexual Predators Act” (“Predator Act”).”
— 775.21(4)(a)(1) — 3 cases
Milks v. State, 894 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2005).
“Brummer, Public Defender and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, FL, for Appellee.”
— 775.21(4)(a)(1)(a) — 4 cases
— 775.21(4)(a)(1)(b) — 3 cases
— 775.21(4)(a)(2) — 2 cases
— 775.21(4)(a)(2)(b) — 1 case
— 775.21(4)(a)(l) — 4 cases
— 775.21(4)(a)(l)(a) — 6 cases
— 775.21(4)(a)(l)(b) — 2 cases
— 775.21(4)(b) — 12 cases
Collie v. State, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
“The result was a new, comprehensive version of The Florida Sexual Predator's Act, codified at section 775.21, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996).”
State v. J.M., 824 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 2002).
“as a sexual predator, pursuant to section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), also known as “The Florida Sexual Predators Act” (“Predator Act”).”
Cabrera v. State, 884 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).
“5th DCA 2003), that an erroneous designation as a sexual predator under section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2002), is a sentencing error that must be properly preserved for review.”
— 775.21(4)(b)(2) — 1 case
— 775.21(4)(b)(3) — 1 case
— 775.21(4)(c) — 17 cases
State v. Robinson, 873 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 2004).
“See § 775.21, Fla. Stat. (1997). In chapter 98-81, section 3, Laws of Florida, the Legislature added sections 787.”
Therrien v. State, 914 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 2005).
“We conclude that section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), does not authorize imposition of a sexual predator designation on a defendant based on a predicate offense that did not qualify the defendant for sexual predator status at the time of sentencing.”
Cabrera v. State, 884 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).
“5th DCA 2003), that an erroneous designation as a sexual predator under section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2002), is a sentencing error that must be properly preserved for review.”
Therrien v. State, 859 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
“This cause arises from an appeal of a post-judgment order designating Appellant as a sexual predator pursuant to section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), as amended effective October 1, 1998.”
Collie v. State, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
“The result was a new, comprehensive version of The Florida Sexual Predator's Act, codified at section 775.21, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996).”
— 775.21(4)(c)(1)(a) — 1 case
— 775.21(4)(c)(1)(b) — 1 case
Therrien v. State, 914 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 2005).
“We conclude that section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), does not authorize imposition of a sexual predator designation on a defendant based on a predicate offense that did not qualify the defendant for sexual predator status at the time of sentencing.”
— 775.21(4)(c)(1)(c) — 1 case
— 775.21(4)(c)(2) — 1 case
Therrien v. State, 914 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 2005).
“We conclude that section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), does not authorize imposition of a sexual predator designation on a defendant based on a predicate offense that did not qualify the defendant for sexual predator status at the time of sentencing.”
— 775.21(4)(c)(l) — 1 case
— 775.21(4)(c)(l)(B) — 1 case
— 775.21(4)(c)(l)(a) — 1 case
— 775.21(4)(d) — 4 cases
Therrien v. State, 914 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 2005).
“We conclude that section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), does not authorize imposition of a sexual predator designation on a defendant based on a predicate offense that did not qualify the defendant for sexual predator status at the time of sentencing.”
Cuevas v. State, 31 So. 3d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
“Desiderio Cuevas appeals from a final order designating him a sexual predator under section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2006). The issue to be determined in this appeal is whether designation as a sexual predator may be ordered after a defendant has served his sentence and been…”
— 775.21(4)(e) — 1 case
— 775.21(4)(e)(l)(a) — 1 case
— 775.21(5) — 12 cases
Milks v. State, 894 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2005).
“Brummer, Public Defender and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, FL, for Appellee.”
State v. Robinson, 873 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 2004).
“See § 775.21, Fla. Stat. (1997). In chapter 98-81, section 3, Laws of Florida, the Legislature added sections 787.”
Saintelien v. State, 990 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 2008).
“[5] We decided Robinson before the Legislature added subsections (4)(d) and (5)(a)(1) to section 775.21. See Ch. 2004-371, § 1, Laws of Fla.”
— 775.21(5)(a) — 18 cases
Cuevas v. State, 31 So. 3d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
“Desiderio Cuevas appeals from a final order designating him a sexual predator under section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2006). The issue to be determined in this appeal is whether designation as a sexual predator may be ordered after a defendant has served his sentence and been…”
Therrien v. State, 914 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 2005).
“We conclude that section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), does not authorize imposition of a sexual predator designation on a defendant based on a predicate offense that did not qualify the defendant for sexual predator status at the time of sentencing.”
Cabrera v. State, 884 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).
“5th DCA 2003), that an erroneous designation as a sexual predator under section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2002), is a sentencing error that must be properly preserved for review.”
Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
“Defendant, an individual who pled guilty to an offense which, pursuant to the FSPA requires that he be designated a "sexual predator," claims that the statute is violative of procedural due process and therefore unconstitutional. As further explained below, we find FSPA to be…”
— 775.21(5)(a)(1) — 5 cases
Therrien v. State, 914 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 2005).
“We conclude that section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), does not authorize imposition of a sexual predator designation on a defendant based on a predicate offense that did not qualify the defendant for sexual predator status at the time of sentencing.”
Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
“Defendant, an individual who pled guilty to an offense which, pursuant to the FSPA requires that he be designated a "sexual predator," claims that the statute is violative of procedural due process and therefore unconstitutional. As further explained below, we find FSPA to be…”
State v. Robinson, 873 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 2004).
“See § 775.21, Fla. Stat. (1997). In chapter 98-81, section 3, Laws of Florida, the Legislature added sections 787.”
— 775.21(5)(a)(2) — 2 cases
Therrien v. State, 914 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 2005).
“We conclude that section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), does not authorize imposition of a sexual predator designation on a defendant based on a predicate offense that did not qualify the defendant for sexual predator status at the time of sentencing.”
— 775.21(5)(b) — 1 case
— 775.21(5)(c) — 9 cases
Therrien v. State, 914 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 2005).
“We conclude that section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), does not authorize imposition of a sexual predator designation on a defendant based on a predicate offense that did not qualify the defendant for sexual predator status at the time of sentencing.”
Cuevas v. State, 31 So. 3d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
“Desiderio Cuevas appeals from a final order designating him a sexual predator under section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2006). The issue to be determined in this appeal is whether designation as a sexual predator may be ordered after a defendant has served his sentence and been…”
Saintelien v. State, 990 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 2008).
“[5] We decided Robinson before the Legislature added subsections (4)(d) and (5)(a)(1) to section 775.21. See Ch. 2004-371, § 1, Laws of Fla.”
— 775.21(5)(d) — 1 case
— 775.21(6) — 18 cases
Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
“Defendant, an individual who pled guilty to an offense which, pursuant to the FSPA requires that he be designated a "sexual predator," claims that the statute is violative of procedural due process and therefore unconstitutional. As further explained below, we find FSPA to be…”
Milks v. State, 894 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2005).
“Brummer, Public Defender and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, FL, for Appellee.”
State v. J.M., 824 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 2002).
“as a sexual predator, pursuant to section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), also known as “The Florida Sexual Predators Act” (“Predator Act”).”
Therrien v. State, 859 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
“This cause arises from an appeal of a post-judgment order designating Appellant as a sexual predator pursuant to section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), as amended effective October 1, 1998.”
— 775.21(6)(Z) — 1 case
State v. J.M., 824 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 2002).
“as a sexual predator, pursuant to section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), also known as “The Florida Sexual Predators Act” (“Predator Act”).”
— 775.21(6)(a) — 10 cases
State v. Robinson, 873 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 2004).
“See § 775.21, Fla. Stat. (1997). In chapter 98-81, section 3, Laws of Florida, the Legislature added sections 787.”
Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
“Defendant, an individual who pled guilty to an offense which, pursuant to the FSPA requires that he be designated a "sexual predator," claims that the statute is violative of procedural due process and therefore unconstitutional. As further explained below, we find FSPA to be…”
— 775.21(6)(b) — 4 cases
State v. Robinson, 873 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 2004).
“See § 775.21, Fla. Stat. (1997). In chapter 98-81, section 3, Laws of Florida, the Legislature added sections 787.”
— 775.21(6)(d) — 1 case
Collie v. State, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
“The result was a new, comprehensive version of The Florida Sexual Predator's Act, codified at section 775.21, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996).”
— 775.21(6)(e) — 6 cases
State v. Robinson, 873 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 2004).
“See § 775.21, Fla. Stat. (1997). In chapter 98-81, section 3, Laws of Florida, the Legislature added sections 787.”
— 775.21(6)(f) — 8 cases
State v. Robinson, 873 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 2004).
“See § 775.21, Fla. Stat. (1997). In chapter 98-81, section 3, Laws of Florida, the Legislature added sections 787.”
— 775.21(6)(g) — 9 cases
Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
“Defendant, an individual who pled guilty to an offense which, pursuant to the FSPA requires that he be designated a "sexual predator," claims that the statute is violative of procedural due process and therefore unconstitutional. As further explained below, we find FSPA to be…”
— 775.21(6)(g)(2)(b) — 1 case
— 775.21(6)(i) — 6 cases
— 775.21(6)(j) — 3 cases
— 775.21(6)(l) — 1 case
State v. Robinson, 873 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 2004).
“See § 775.21, Fla. Stat. (1997). In chapter 98-81, section 3, Laws of Florida, the Legislature added sections 787.”
— 775.21(7) — 9 cases
Milks v. State, 894 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2005).
“Brummer, Public Defender and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, FL, for Appellee.”
Collie v. State, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
“The result was a new, comprehensive version of The Florida Sexual Predator's Act, codified at section 775.21, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996).”
Therrien v. State, 859 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
“This cause arises from an appeal of a post-judgment order designating Appellant as a sexual predator pursuant to section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), as amended effective October 1, 1998.”
State v. J.M., 824 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 2002).
“as a sexual predator, pursuant to section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), also known as “The Florida Sexual Predators Act” (“Predator Act”).”
— 775.21(7)(a) — 4 cases
Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
“Defendant, an individual who pled guilty to an offense which, pursuant to the FSPA requires that he be designated a "sexual predator," claims that the statute is violative of procedural due process and therefore unconstitutional. As further explained below, we find FSPA to be…”
State v. Robinson, 873 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 2004).
“See § 775.21, Fla. Stat. (1997). In chapter 98-81, section 3, Laws of Florida, the Legislature added sections 787.”
Collie v. State, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
“The result was a new, comprehensive version of The Florida Sexual Predator's Act, codified at section 775.21, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996).”
— 775.21(7)(b) — 1 case
Collie v. State, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
“The result was a new, comprehensive version of The Florida Sexual Predator's Act, codified at section 775.21, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996).”
— 775.21(7)(c) — 1 case
Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
“Defendant, an individual who pled guilty to an offense which, pursuant to the FSPA requires that he be designated a "sexual predator," claims that the statute is violative of procedural due process and therefore unconstitutional. As further explained below, we find FSPA to be…”
— 775.21(8)(a) — 7 cases
— 775.21(9) — 3 cases
Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
“Defendant, an individual who pled guilty to an offense which, pursuant to the FSPA requires that he be designated a "sexual predator," claims that the statute is violative of procedural due process and therefore unconstitutional. As further explained below, we find FSPA to be…”
State v. Robinson, 873 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 2004).
“See § 775.21, Fla. Stat. (1997). In chapter 98-81, section 3, Laws of Florida, the Legislature added sections 787.”
Milks v. State, 894 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2005).
“Brummer, Public Defender and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, FL, for Appellee.”
— 775.21(9)(b) — 3 cases
Collie v. State, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
“The result was a new, comprehensive version of The Florida Sexual Predator's Act, codified at section 775.21, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996).”
Therrien v. State, 859 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
“This cause arises from an appeal of a post-judgment order designating Appellant as a sexual predator pursuant to section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), as amended effective October 1, 1998.”
— 775.21(a) — 4 cases
Cuevas v. State, 31 So. 3d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
“Desiderio Cuevas appeals from a final order designating him a sexual predator under section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2006). The issue to be determined in this appeal is whether designation as a sexual predator may be ordered after a defendant has served his sentence and been…”
— 775.21(d) — 1 case
— 775.21(f) — 1 case
— 775.21(g) — 1 case
— 775.21(k) — 1 case
— 775.21(l) — 1 case
— 775.21(m) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.