O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 1-2-7 (2019)

Rights of female citizens generally

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Female citizens are entitled to the privilege of the elective franchise and have the right to hold any civil office or perform any civil function as fully and completely as do male citizens.

History

Orig. Code 1863, § 1587; Code 1868, § 1650; Code 1873, § 1656; Code 1882, § 1656; Civil Code 1895, § 1810; Ga. L. 1896, p. 40, § 1; Civil Code

1910, § 2167; Ga. L. 1912, p. 62, § 1; Ga. L. 1916, p. 43, § 1; Ga. L. 1918, p. 118, § 1; Ga. L. 1921, p. 106, §§ 1, 2; Code 1933, § 79-207; Ga. L. 1975, p. 779, § 2;

Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 1; Ga. L. 1982, p. 826, § 1; Ga. L. 1984, p. 22, § 1. History of Code section. - The language of this section is derived in part

from the decision in Ex parte Hale, 145 Ga. 350, 89 S.E. 216 (1916).

Annotations

Cross references. - Sex discrimination in employment, T. 34, C. 5.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS All qualified, nonexempt women have right to jury duty. - It is the law’s intent that all women who are qualified for jury duty, and who are not exempt from jury duty under law, shall have the right to and the responsibility of jury duty in accordance with the provisions of Geor-

gia law. Mann v. Cox, 487 F. Supp. 147 (S.D. Ga. 1979). Cited in Curtis v. Ashworth, 165 Ga. 782, 142 S.E. 111, 59 A.L.R. 1457 (1928); Reece v. State, 208 Ga. 165, 66 S.E.2d 133 (1951).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 16B Am. Jur. 2d, Constitutional Law, § 877 et seq. C.J.S. - 14A C.J.S., Civil Rights, § 172 et seq.

ALR. - Validity of testamentary trust to promote women’s rights, 28 A.L.R. 720.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1985–1985 · leading case: Warren v. State, 336 S.E.2d 221 (Ga. 1985).
Warren v. State, 336 S.E.2d 221 (Ga. 1985). · cites it 2× “” OCGA § 1-2-7. Couples who contemplate marriage today may choose either spouse’s surname or a combination of both names for their married *155 surname, OCGA § 19-3-33.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.