Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 1-4-2 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

Section 4. Holidays and Observances, 1-4-1 through 1-4-22.

1-4-2. Religious holidays.

The only days to be declared, treated, and considered as religious holidays shall be the first day of each week, called Sunday.

(Ga. L. 1943, p. 331, § 2.)

Cross references.

- Operation of motion picture theaters and holding of athletic events, games, and contests on Sunday, § 10-1-550 et seq.

Requirement that businesses and industries operating on either Saturday or Sunday accommodate religious, social, and physical needs of employees on those days, § 10-1-573.

Penalty for discharging firearm on Sunday, § 16-11-105.

Prohibition against requiring inmates to do nonessential work on Sunday, § 42-5-40.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Sunday, a religious holiday, is dies non juridicus (a nonjudicial day). Parker v. Mayor of Savannah, 216 Ga. 210, 115 S.E.2d 555 (1960).

Cited in Cain v. Lumpkin County, 229 Ga. 274, 190 S.E.2d 910 (1972); In re Estate of Dasher, 259 Ga. App. 201, 575 S.E.2d 921 (2002).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 73 Am. Jur. 2d, Sundays and Holidays, §§ 1, 2, 4, 5, 9 et seq.

C.J.S.

- 83 C.J.S., Sunday, §§ 1, 3.

ALR.

- Power of municipal corporation to legislate as to Sunday observance, 37 A.L.R. 575.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 1-4-2 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 20

In THE MATTER OF JOHN L.G. HERBERT, JR. (Four Cases)

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-10-01

Snippet: pursued.” 2 1.4,2 Rule 1.5 (a),3 Rule 1.15 (I) (a),4 Rule 1.15 (I)

In THE MATTER OF JOHN L.G. HERBERT, JR. (Four Cases)

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-10-01

Snippet: pursued.” 2 1.4,2 Rule 1.5 (a),3 Rule 1.15 (I) (a),4 Rule 1.15 (I)

Ward, Comr. v. Medina

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2023-05-16

Snippet: Fourteenth Amendment,”); State v. Allen, 298 Ga. 1, 4 (2) (779 SE2d 248) (2015) (“A trial court’s conclusion

In the Matter of Michael Anthony Eddings

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-08-09

Snippet: Bar charged Eddings with violating Rules 3.3, 4.1, 4.2 (a), 8.l (a), and 8.4 (a) (4) and invoked Bar Rule

Department of Transportation v. Mixon

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2021-10-05

Snippet: State Highway Dept. of Ga. v. McClain, 216 Ga. 1, 4 (2) (114 SE2d 125) (1960) (“It is, of course, well

In THE MATTER OF CYNTHIA ANN LAIN (Five Cases)

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2021-04-19

Snippet: 6 violated Rules 1.3,1 1.4,2 and 3.1 (b).3 Specifically, the Special Master

Brock v. Hardman

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2018-05-21

Citation: 814 S.E.2d 736

Snippet: and we retain jurisdiction under OCGA § 15-3-3.1 (4). 2. Our conclusion that we have jurisdiction over

Gibson v. Gibson

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-06-05

Citation: 301 Ga. 622, 801 S.E.2d 40, 2017 WL 2417057, 2017 Ga. LEXIS 455

Snippet: , LLLP v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 289 Ga. 1, 4 (2) (709 SE2d 267) (2011). This remains true even

Philpot v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-11-21

Citation: 300 Ga. 154, 794 S.E.2d 140, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 751

Snippet: denying the motion. See Rivers v. State, 283 Ga. 1, 4 (2) (655 SE2d 594) (2008). 3. With respect to appellant’s

Cottrell v. Atlanta Development Authority, D/B/A Invest Atlanta

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-16

Snippet: 1), (3.2), (3.3), (3.4), (3.5), (3.7), (4), (4.1), (4.2), (4.3), (4.4), (4.5), (4.6), (4.7), (5), (5

COTTRELL Et Al. v. ATLANTA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Et Al.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-16

Citation: 297 Ga. 1, 770 S.E.2d 616, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 179

Snippet: 1), (3.2), (3.3), (3.4), (3.5), (3.7), (4), (4.1), (4.2), (4.3), (4.4), (4.5), (4.6), (4.7), (5), (5.1)

DeKalb County School District v. Georgia State Board of Education

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-11-25

Citation: 294 Ga. 349, 751 S.E.2d 827

Snippet: permissible at this stage. See Eaves v. Harris, 258 Ga. 1, 4 (2) (b) (364 SE2d 854) (1988). Before a member is

Ledford v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-03-25

Citation: 709 S.E.2d 239, 289 Ga. 70, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 934, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 267

Snippet: commission of multiple crimes." Waits v. State, 282 Ga. 1, 4(2), 644 S.E.2d 127 (2007). In this case, the first

Brown v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-11-01

Citation: 703 S.E.2d 609, 288 Ga. 364, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 3497, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 824

Snippet: aggravated assault. See Waits v. State, 282 Ga. 1, 4 (2) (644 SE2d 127) (2007). Moreover, the State neither

Linson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-10-04

Citation: 700 S.E.2d 394, 287 Ga. 881, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 3209, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 639

Snippet: under OCGA § 16-1-6(1)." Waits v. State, 282 Ga. 1, 4(2), 644 S.E.2d 127 (2007). The "required evidence"

Hall v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-01-25

Citation: 687 S.E.2d 819, 286 Ga. 358, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 189, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 94

Snippet: multiple crimes. [Cits.]" Waits v. State, 282 Ga. 1, 4(2), 644 S.E.2d 127 (2007). Based on the allegations

McCloud v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2008-11-17

Citation: 670 S.E.2d 784, 284 Ga. 665, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 3680, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 979

Snippet: multiple crimes. [Cits.]" Waits v. State, 282 Ga. 1, 4(2), 644 S.E.2d 127 (2007). Here, the same conduct

Hutchins v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2008-10-06

Citation: 667 S.E.2d 589, 284 Ga. 395, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 3176, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 799

Snippet: other.' (Cit.)" [Cit.] Waits v. State, 282 Ga. 1, 4(2), 644 S.E.2d 127 (2007). The principle stated in

Glenn v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-05-14

Citation: 644 S.E.2d 826, 282 Ga. 27

Snippet: the exceptions set forth in OCGA § 16-17-2(a)(1)-(4). [2] Appellant Glenn was charged with 49 misdemeanor

In re Rowan

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2005-09-19

Citation: 279 Ga. 659, 619 S.E.2d 675, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 2830, 2005 Ga. LEXIS 501

Snippet: case Rowan is deemed to have violated Rules 1.3, 1.4, 2.1, 3.2, 8.4, and 9.3. In Case No. S05Y1199, Rowan