O.C.G.A.

14-9A-70 (2019)

Rights, powers, and liabilities of general partner

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A general partner shall have all the rights and powers and be subject to all the restrictions and liabilities of a partner in a partnership without limited partners, except that without the written consent or ratification of the specific act by all the limited partners, a general partner or all of the general partners have no authority to: (1) Do any act in contravention of the certificate required under Code Section 14-9A-20; (2) Do any act which would make it impossible to carry on the ordinary business of the partnership; (3) Confess a judgment against the partnership; (4) Possess partnership property, or assign their rights in specific partnership property, for other than a partnership purpose; (5) Admit a person as a general partner, unless the partnership agreement provides otherwise; (6) Admit a person as a limited partner, unless the right so to do is given in the certificate; (7) Continue the business with partnership property on the death, retirement, or insanity of a general partner, unless the right so to do is given in the certificate.

History

(Ga. L. 1952, p. 375, § 9; Code 1981, § 14-9-70; Code 1981, § 14-9A-70, as redesignated by Ga. L. 1988, p. 1016, § 1.)

Annotations

Law reviews. - For article on the definition of a security in light of the 1973 Georgia Securities Act and the need for

maximizing investor protection, see 30 Emory L.J. 73 (1981).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS General partner in limited partnership has same rights and liabilities of partner in ordinary partnership. Sugarman v. Shaginaw, 151 Ga. App. 621, 260 S.E.2d 731 (1979). General partner can bind limited partnership by execution of note. - A general partner in a limited partnership has power to bind the partnership by that partner’s execution of a promissory note on behalf of the partnership where nothing in a limited partnership agreement

would limit the power of its general partners to bind the limited partnership in such a manner. Tara Apts., Ltd. v. Citizens & S. Nat’l Bank, 149 Ga. App. 577, 254 S.E.2d 897 (1979). To bind assets of partner, partner must be served and have that partner’s day in court. Sugarman v. Shaginaw, 151 Ga. App. 621, 260 S.E.2d 731 (1979). Agreement construed to make it impossible for partnership to function. - Partnership agreement which referred

CORPORATIONS & PARTNERSHIPS

to the security deed held by a general partner and specified that certain capital contributions were to be used to retire that obligation was deemed to be written consent to general partner’s foreclosure on security deed which made it impossible for the partnership to carry on its ordinary business. Westminster Properties, Inc. v. Atlanta Assocs., 250 Ga. 841, 301 S.E.2d 636 (1983).

Cited in Coop Mtg. Invs. Assocs. v. Pendley, 134 Ga. App. 236, 214 S.E.2d 572 (1975); North Peachtree I-285 Properties, Ltd. v. Hicks, 136 Ga. App. 426, 221 S.E.2d 607 (1975); Atlanta Whses., Inc. v. Housing Auth., 143 Ga. App. 588, 239 S.E.2d 387 (1977); Third World, Ltd. No. II v. Brewmasters of Augusta, Inc., 155 Ga. App. 352, 270 S.E.2d 891 (1980).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Foreign corporation as general partner. - A foreign corporation transacting business in Georgia as a general partner in a limited partnership must qualify to do business under O.C.G.A. Ch. 2, T. 14. 1982 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 82-95. Licensing requirements for general partner who manages partnership property. - To the extent the general partner in a limited partnership manages the property owned by the partnership full time and receives no separate fee, commission, or salary for the brokerage

aspects of this management, it would appear that the general partner is excepted from the licensure and regulatory requirements under former § 43-40-29(7) (now O.C.G.A. § 43-40-29(a)(7)), but, if the general partner also managed the property of others, the exception under former § 43-40-29(7) (now O.C.G.A. § 43-40-29(a)(7)) would not apply and that person would be required to be licensed by the commission. 1984 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 84-80.

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 59A Am. Jur. 2d, Partnership, § 829 et seq. C.J.S. - 68 C.J.S., Partnership, § 582 et seq. U.L.A. - Uniform Limited Partnership Act (U.L.A.) § 9. ALR. - Powers, duties, and accounting responsibilities of managing partner of mining partnership, 24 ALR2d 1359.

Partner’s breach of fiduciary duty to copartner on sale of partnership interest to another partner, 4 ALR4th 1122. Derivative liability of partner for punitive damages for wrongful act of copartner, 14 ALR4th 1335.

PART 5 CONTRIBUTORS

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1989–2001 · leading case: Blashke v. Stand. (In Re Stand.), 123 B.R. 444 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1991).
Blashke v. Stand. (In Re Stand.), 123 B.R. 444 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1991). · cites it 2× “This provision of the Uniform Partnership Act is applicable to general partners in a limited partnership by virtue of O.C.G.A. § 14-9A-70 (1989). 7 . The law in the Ninth Circuit is not altogether clear.”
Canadyne-Georgia Corp. v. Bank of Am., N.A., 174 F. Supp. 2d 1337 (M.D. Ga. 2001). · cites it 4× “§ 14-8-15 (1994) (citing unamended code section as this was version in effect during the Woolfolk Trust’s tenure as general partner).”
Prodigy Centers/Atlanta v. T-C Assocs., 501 S.E.2d 209 (Ga. 1998). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 14-9A-70. The “interest in the partnership” is but one of the general partner’s property rights: the general partner also has rights in specific partnership property and the right to participate in the management of the limited partnership.”
Williams v. Tritt, 415 S.E.2d 285 (Ga. 1992). · cites it 2× “621, 626 ( 260 SE2d 731 ) (1979); OCGA § 14-9A-70. The Georgia Uniform Partnership Act grants any general partner the right to a formal accounting as to partnership affairs if the partner is wrongfully excluded from partnership business, the right exists under the terms of any…”
York Assocs., Inc. v. Frenchman's Creek Investors, Ltd., 720 F. Supp. 991 (N.D. Ga. 1989). “Section 14-9-702 of The Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act provides that a General Partner in a limited partnership may transfer or assign his or her interest in whole or in part, however, it seems that for partnerships created prior to July of 1988 § 14-9A-70 applies.…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.