Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §15-11-230, enacted by Ga. L. 2013, p. 294, § 1-1/HB 242.)
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Code 1933, § 24A-2701, pre-2000 Code Section 15-11-41, and pre-2014 Code Section 15-11-58, which were subsequently repealed but were succeeded by provisions in this Code section, are included in the annotations for this Code section. See the Editor's notes at the beginning of the chapter.
- Following factors were relevant in determining whether a private remedy was implicit in a statute not expressly providing one: first, was the plaintiff one of the class for whose special benefit the statute was enacted; second, was there any indication of legislative intent, explicit or implicit, either to create such a remedy or to deny one; third, was it consistent with the underlying purpose of the legislative scheme to imply such a remedy for plaintiff? When foster children alleged that certain child services agencies and officials violated former O.C.G.A. § 15-11-58(c) and (o)(1) (see now O.C.G.A. §§ 15-11-201 and15-11-230), then the former statute conferred upon the children a private cause of action. Kenny A. v. Perdue, 218 F.R.D. 277 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 18, 2003) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 15-11-58).
No results found for Georgia Code 15-11-230.