Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 15-11-201 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 15 COURTS

Section 11. Juvenile Code, 15-11-1 through 15-11-747.

ARTICLE 3 DEPENDENCY PROCEEDINGS

15-11-201. (Effective until July 1, 2020. See note.) DFCS case plan; contents.

  1. A case plan shall be designed to achieve placement in the most appropriate, least restrictive, and most family-like setting available and in close proximity to the alleged dependent child's parent's home, consistent with the best interests and special needs of such child, and shall consider the placement's proximity to the school in which such child is enrolled at the time of placement.
  2. A case plan shall be developed by DFCS and the parent, guardian, or legal custodian of the alleged dependent child and, when appropriate, such child. A case plan shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following:
    1. A description of the circumstances that resulted in such child being placed under the jurisdiction of the court and in foster care;
    2. An assessment of such child's and his or her family's strengths and needs and the type of placement best equipped to meet those needs;
    3. A description of the type of home or institution in which such child is to be placed, including a discussion of the safety and appropriateness of the placement;
    4. Specific time-limited goals and related activities designed to enable the safe return of such child to his or her home, or, in the event that return to his or her home is not possible, activities designed to result in permanent placement or emancipation;
    5. Assignment of specific responsibility for accomplishing the planned activities;
    6. The projected date of completion of the case plan objectives;
    7. The date time-limited services will be terminated;
    8. A schedule of visits between such child and his or her siblings and other appropriate family members and an explanation if no visits are scheduled;
    9. When placement is made in a foster family home, group home, or other child care institution that is either a substantial distance from the home of such child's parent, guardian, or legal custodian or out of state, the case plan shall specify the reasons why the placement is the most appropriate and is in the best interests of the child;
    10. When an out-of-state group home placement is recommended or made, the case plan shall comply with Code Section 39-4-4, the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children. In addition, documentation of the recommendation of the multidisciplinary team and the rationale for such particular placement shall be included. The case plan shall also address what in-state services or facilities were used or considered and why they were not recommended;
    11. If applicable, a statement that reasonable efforts have been made and a requirement that reasonable efforts shall be made for so long as such child remains in the custody of the department:
      1. To place siblings removed from their home in the same foster care, kinship care, guardianship, or adoptive placement, unless DFCS documents that such a joint placement would be contrary to the safety or well-being of any of the siblings; and
      2. In the case of siblings removed from their home who are not so jointly placed, for frequent visitation or other ongoing interaction between the siblings, unless DFCS documents that such frequent visitation or other ongoing interaction would be contrary to the safety or well-being of any of the siblings;
    12. Provisions ensuring the educational stability of such child while in foster care, including:
      1. An assurance that the placement of such child in foster care takes into account the appropriateness of the current educational setting and the proximity to the school in which such child is enrolled at the time of placement;
      2. An assurance that the state agency has coordinated with appropriate local educational agencies to ensure that such child remains in the school in which such child is enrolled at the time of placement; or
      3. If remaining in such school is not in the best interests of the child, an assurance by DFCS that DFCS and the local educational agencies have cooperated to assure the immediate and appropriate enrollment in a new school, with all of the educational records of such child provided to such new school;
    13. An account of health and education information about such child including school records, immunizations, known medical problems, any known medications he or she may be taking, names and addresses of his or her health and educational providers; such child's grade level performance; assurances that such child's placement in foster care takes into account proximity to the school in which he or she was enrolled at the time of placement; and other relevant health and educational information;
    14. A recommendation for a permanency plan for such child. If, after considering reunification, adoptive placement, permanent guardianship, or placement with a fit and willing relative, DFCS recommends placement in another planned permanent living arrangement for a child who has attained the age of 16, the case plan shall include:
      1. Documentation of a compelling reason or reasons why reunification, termination of parental rights and adoption, permanent guardianship, or placement with a fit and willing relative are not in the child's best interests;
      2. Documentation of the intensive, ongoing, and unsuccessful efforts made by the state agency to return the child home or secure a placement for the child with a fit and willing relative, a legal guardian, or an adoptive parent, including through efforts that utilize search technology, including social media, to find biological family members for the child; and
      3. Documentation of the steps the state agency is taking to ensure that the child's foster family home or child care institution is following the reasonable and prudent parent standard, as defined in Code Section 49-5-3, and documentation that the child has regular, ongoing opportunities to engage in age or developmentally appropriate activities, as defined in Code Section 49-5-3, including by consulting with the child in an age-appropriate manner about the opportunities of the child to participate in the activities.

        For purposes of this paragraph, a "compelling reason" shall have the same meaning as in paragraph (2) of subsection (b) of Code Section 15-11-233;

      1. A statement that the parent, guardian, or legal custodian of such child and the child have had an opportunity to participate in the development of the case plan, to review the case plan, to sign the case plan, and to receive a copy of the plan, or an explanation about why such persons were not able to participate or sign the case plan.
      2. The case plan for each child in foster care who has attained the age of 14 years old shall be developed and revised in consultation with the child and, at the option of the child, up to two members of the case planning team who are chosen by the child and who are not a foster parent of, or caseworker for, the child. DFCS may reject an individual selected by a child to be a member of the case planning team at any time if DFCS has good cause to believe that the individual would not act in the best interests of the child. One such member may be designated to be the child's advisor and, as necessary, advocate, with respect to the application of the reasonable and prudent parent standard to the child.
      3. The case plan for each child in foster care who has attained the age of 14 years old shall include:
        1. A document describing the rights of the child with respect to education, health, visitation, and court participation, the right to be provided with a consumer report pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 675(5)(I), and the right to stay safe and avoid exploitation; and
        2. A signed acknowledgment by the child that the child has been provided with a copy of the document described in division (i) of this subparagraph and that the rights contained in the document have been explained to the child in an age-appropriate way;
    15. A requirement that the DFCS case manager and staff and, as appropriate, other representatives of such child provide him or her with assistance and support in developing a transition plan that is personalized at the direction of such child, including specific options on housing, health insurance, education, local opportunities for mentors and continuing support services, and work force supports and employment services, and is as detailed as such child may elect. The transition plan shall be completed in the 90 day period:
      1. Immediately prior to the date on which such child will attain 18 years of age; or
      2. If such child remains in the care of DFCS past his or her eighteenth birthday, before his or her planned exit from DFCS care.
    16. For such child in out-of-home care who is 14 years of age or older, a written description of the programs and services which will help him or her prepare for the transition from foster care to independent living; and
    17. The identity of the person within DFCS or other agency who is directly responsible for ensuring that the case plan is implemented.

(Code 1981, §15-11-201, enacted by Ga. L. 2013, p. 294, § 1-1/HB 242; Ga. L. 2014, p. 780, § 1-11/SB 364; Ga. L. 2015, p. 552, § 13/SB 138.)

The 2014 amendment, effective April 28, 2014, substituted "reunification, termination of parental rights, adoptive placement, or permanent guardianship are" for "termination of parental rights is" in the second sentence of paragraph (b)(14).

The 2015 amendment, effective July 1, 2015, rewrote paragraph (14); in paragraph (15), designated the existing provisions as subparagraph (15)(A), substituted a period for the concluding semicolon in subparagraph (15)(A), and added subparagraphs (15)(B) and (15)(C).

Editor's notes.

- Code Section 15-11-201 is set out twice in this Code. The first version is effective until July 1, 2020, and the second version becomes effective on that date.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Editor's notes.

- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Code 1933, § 24A-2701, pre-2000 Code Section 15-11-41, and pre-2014 Code Section 15-11-58, which were subsequently repealed but were succeeded by provisions in this Code section, are included in the annotations for this Code section. See the Editor's notes at the beginning of the chapter.

Private cause of action.

- Following factors were relevant in determining whether a private remedy was implicit in a statute not expressly providing one: first, was the plaintiff one of the class for whose special benefit the statute was enacted; second, was there any indication of legislative intent, explicit or implicit, either to create such a remedy or to deny one; third, was it consistent with the underlying purpose of the legislative scheme to imply such a remedy for plaintiff? When foster children alleged that certain child services agencies and officials violated former O.C.G.A. § 15-11-58(c) and (o)(1) (see now O.C.G.A. §§ 15-11-201 and15-11-230), then the former statute conferred upon the children a private cause of action. Kenny A. v. Perdue, 218 F.R.D. 277 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 18, 2003) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 15-11-58).

Timing of case plan made it impossible to comply with case plan.

- Record provided no support for a finding that the aunt and uncle failed to comply with the goals of a case plan for reunification with the child, and to the extent the juvenile court based the court's ruling on such a failure, the court erred because the only written case plans were an unfiled case plan dated May 6, 2016, and another case plan dated May 10, 2016, and filed May 12, 2016; the first hearing on the motion for nonreunification was held on May 13, 2016, the day after the May 10 case plan was filed with the juvenile court; and the juvenile court issued the order on August 16, 2016, nunc pro tunc June 2, 2016, even though the May 10 case plan gave the aunt and uncle until September 30, 2016, to complete several reunification goals. In the Interest of B. G., 345 Ga. App. 167, 812 S.E.2d 552 (2018).

No results found for Georgia Code 15-11-201.