O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 15-11-3 (2019)
Direct calendaring
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Through direct calendaring, whenever possible, a single judge shall hear all successive cases or proceedings involving the same child or family.
History
Code 1981, § 15-11-3, enacted by Ga. L. 2013, p. 294, § 1-1/HB 242.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases, 1994–2020 · leading case: In the Interest of J. N., 691 S.E.2d 396 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010).
In the Interest of J. N., 691 S.E.2d 396 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010). “§ 24A-3801 [currently codified at OCGA § 15-11-3] (Ga. L. 1971, pp. 709, 755).”
State v. Gober, 494 S.E.2d 724 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). “OCGA § 15-11-3. Nor is the judge of the juvenile court a "county officer" under Art.”
In re Interest of K.S., 814 S.E.2d 324 (Ga. 2018). “, which address, inter alia, the transfer of a case from juvenile to superior court for criminal prosecution.”
In the Interest of K.s., a Child, 303 Ga. 542 (Ga. 2018). “1 When the General Assembly 1 In all cases of final judgments of a juvenile court judge, appeals shall be taken to the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court in the same manner as appeals from the superior court.”
Roberts v. Tharp, 690 S.E.2d 404 (Ga. 2010). “See OCGA § 15-11-3. 1. Father contends that the juvenile court erred by failing to include in its orders regarding child support the specific provisions required by OCGA § 19-6-15 (c) (2), including a determination of the parents’ gross income and certain findings regarding the…”
In the Interest of B. L. S., 449 S.E.2d 823 (Ga. 1994). “OCGA § 15-11-3 (g). Accordingly, it was properly denied.”
In Re Jefferson, 645 S.E.2d 349 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007). “See OCGA § 15-11-3 (appeals from final judgments of a juvenile court "shall be taken .”
In the Interest of J. L. K., 691 S.E.2d 892 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010). “See also OCGA § 15-11-3 (for “final judgments of a juvenile court judge, appeals shall be taken to the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court in the same manner as appeals from the superior court”).”
In the Interest of D. H., a Child, 772 S.E.2d 70 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015). “did not seek to withdraw his admissions between adjudication and entry of disposition and did not file a timely notice of appeal from the disposition, which is a final judgment from which a direct appeal lies if taken within 30 days. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a) (Anotice of appeal must…”
In the Interest of C. B., 686 S.E.2d 124 (Ga. 2009). “Pursuant to OCGA § 15-11-3, there is no statutory right to super-sedeas in juvenile proceedings, but the juvenile court has discretion to grant or deny supersedeas.”
Peters v. Followill, 497 S.E.2d 789 (Ga. 1998). “The recipients of the order argue that the judges of the superior court cannot fix the salary of the juvenile court judge without the approval of the Columbus Council.”
In Re Jn, 691 S.E.2d 396 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010). “§ 24A-3801 [currently codified at OCGA § 15-11-3] (Ga. L. 1971, pp. 709, 755).”
— 15-11-3(a) — 1 case
State v. Gober, 494 S.E.2d 724 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). “OCGA § 15-11-3. Nor is the judge of the juvenile court a "county officer" under Art.”
— 15-11-3(d)(1) — 1 case
State v. Gober, 494 S.E.2d 724 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). “OCGA § 15-11-3. Nor is the judge of the juvenile court a "county officer" under Art.”
— 15-11-3(i) — 1 case
State v. Gober, 494 S.E.2d 724 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). “OCGA § 15-11-3. Nor is the judge of the juvenile court a "county officer" under Art.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.