Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §15-18-80, enacted by Ga. L. 2000, p. 1115, § 3; Ga. L. 2006, p. 420, § 1/HB 718; Ga. L. 2012, p. 899, § 2-3/HB 1176; Ga. L. 2016, p. 443, § 1-9/SB 367; Ga. L. 2018, p. 906, § 1/SB 369.)
The 2016 amendment, effective July 1, 2016, added the last sentence in subsection (a).
The 2018 amendment, effective July 1, 2018, in subsection (f), deleted "and collect" following "assess" in the first sentence, inserted "collected by the clerk of court and" in the third sentence, and added the fourth sentence.
- Authorization to establish and administer pretrial intervention programs, § 34-2-14.
Pretrial release and diversion programs, T. 42, C. 8, A. 5.
- Ga. L. 2012, p. 899, § 9-1(a)/HB 1176, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: "This Act shall become effective on July 1, 2012, and shall apply to offenses which occur on or after that date. Any offense occurring before July 1, 2012, shall be governed by the statute in effect at the time of such offense and shall be considered a prior conviction for the purpose of imposing a sentence that provides for a different penalty for a subsequent conviction for the same type of offense, of whatever degree or level, pursuant to this Act."
- For article on the 2012 amendment of this Code section, see 29 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 290 (2012). For article on the 2016 amendment of this Code section, see 33 Georgia St. U.L. Rev. 139 (2016).
- Bondsman was not released from liability on the bondsman's bond for an accused shoplifter under O.C.G.A. § 17-6-31(d)(1)(C) because of the shoplifter's entry into a pretrial diversion program because the statute applied only to "a court ordered" program, and, in this case, the trial court had no involvement in the program. The enactment of O.C.G.A. § 15-18-80, allowing prosecutors to create pretrial diversion programs, did not implicitly amend § 17-6-31(d)(1)(C) or eliminate court-ordered programs. AA-Prof'l Bail Bonding v. Deal, 332 Ga. App. 857, 775 S.E.2d 217 (2015).
- Prosecution of the defendants for theft by taking and criminal trespass in Calhoun County, O.C.G.A. §§ 16-7-21(b) and16-8-2, was not prohibited by double jeopardy based on their prior entry into a pretrial intervention program under O.C.G.A. § 15-18-80(b) following charges of theft by receiving stolen property, O.C.G.A. § 16-8-7(a), in Irwin County because there was no prosecution in Irwin County within the meaning of O.C.G.A. §§ 16-1-3(14) and16-1-8(a)(1)-(2). Palmer v. State, 341 Ga. App. 433, 801 S.E.2d 300 (2017).
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-04-16
Snippet: district attorney’s office pursuant to OCGA § 15-18-80,1 requiring him, for the duration of the PDA