Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 16-12-20 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 16-12-20 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 16-12-20

TITLE 16 CRIMES AND OFFENSES

Section 12. Offenses Against Public Health and Morals, 16-12-1 through 16-12-191.

ARTICLE 2 GAMBLING AND RELATED OFFENSES

16-12-20. Definitions.

As used in this part, the term:

  1. "Bet" means an agreement that, dependent upon chance even though accompanied by some skill, one stands to win or lose something of value. A bet does not include:
    1. Contracts of indemnity or guaranty or life, health, property, or accident insurance; or
    2. An offer of a prize, award, or compensation to the actual contestants in any bona fide contest for the determination of skill, speed, strength, or endurance or to the owners of animals, vehicles, watercraft, or aircraft entered in such contest.
  2. "Gambling device" means:
    1. Any contrivance which for a consideration affords the player an opportunity to obtain money or other thing of value, the award of which is determined by chance even though accompanied by some skill, whether or not the prize is automatically paid by contrivance;
    2. Any slot machine or any simulation or variation thereof;
    3. Any matchup or lineup game machine or device, operated for any consideration, in which two or more numerals, symbols, letters, or icons align in a winning combination on one or more lines vertically, horizontally, diagonally, or otherwise, without assistance by the player. Use of skill stops shall not be considered assistance by the player; or
    4. Any video game machine or device, operated for any consideration, for the play of poker, blackjack, any other card game, or keno or any simulation or variation of any of the foregoing, including, but not limited to, any game in which numerals, numbers, or any pictures, representations, or symbols are used as an equivalent or substitute for cards in the conduct of such game.

      Any item described in subparagraph (B), (C), or (D) of this paragraph shall be a prohibited gambling device subject to and prohibited by this part, notwithstanding any inference to the contrary in any other law of this state.

  3. "Gambling place" means any real estate, building, room, tent, vehicle, boat, or other property whatsoever, one of the principal uses of which is the making or settling of bets; the receiving, holding, recording, or forwarding of bets or offers to bet; or the conducting of a lottery or the playing of gambling devices.
  4. "Lottery" means any scheme or procedure whereby one or more prizes are distributed by chance among persons who have paid or promised consideration for a chance to win such prize, whether such scheme or procedure is called a pool, lottery, raffle, gift, gift enterprise, sale, policy game, or by some other name. Except as otherwise provided in Code Section 16-12-35, a lottery shall also include the payment of cash or other consideration or the payment for merchandise or services and the option to participate in or play, even if others can participate or play for free, a no skill game or to participate for cash, other consideration, other evidence of winnings, or other noncash prizes by lot or in a finite pool on a computer, mechanical device, or electronic device whereby the player is able to win a cash or noncash prize, other consideration, or other evidence of winnings. A lottery shall also include the organization of chain letter or pyramid clubs as provided in Code Section 16-12-38. A lottery shall not mean a:
    1. Promotional giveaway or contest which conforms with the qualifications of a lawful promotion specified in paragraph (16) of subsection (b) of Code Section 10-1-393;
    2. Scheme whereby a business gives away prizes to persons selected by lot if such prizes are made on the following conditions:
      1. Such prizes are conducted as advertising and promotional undertakings in good faith solely for the purpose of advertising the goods, wares, and merchandise of such business;
      2. No person to be eligible to receive such prize shall be required to:
    3. Pay any tangible consideration to the operator of such business in the form of money or other property or thing of value;
    4. Purchase any goods, wares, merchandise, or anything of value from such business; or
    5. Be present or be asked to participate in a seminar, sales presentation, or any other presentation, by whatever name denominated, in order to win such prizes; and
      1. The prizes awarded shall be noncash prizes and cannot be awarded based upon the playing of a game on a computer, mechanical device, or electronic device at a place of business in this state;
    6. Raffle authorized under Code Section 16-12-22.1; or
    7. National or regional promotion, contest, or sweepstakes conducted by any corporation or wholly owned subsidiary or valid franchise of such corporation, either directly or through another entity, provided that, at the time of such promotion, contest, or sweepstakes, such corporation:
      1. Is registered under the federal Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      2. Has total assets of not less than $100 million.

      The provisions of this part shall not be applicable to games offered by the Georgia Lottery Corporation pursuant to Chapter 27 of Title 50.

(Code 1933, § 26-2701, enacted by Ga. L. 1968, p. 1249, § 1; Ga. L. 1975, p. 1072, § 2; Ga. L. 1982, p. 1661, § 3; Ga. L. 1985, p. 437, § 1; Ga. L. 1986, p. 1313, § 3; Ga. L. 1987, p. 1386, § 3; Ga. L. 1995, p. 832, § 1; Ga. 2001, Ex. Sess., p. 312, § 1; Ga. L. 2012, p. 1136, § 2/SB 431.)

Code Commission notes.

- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1988, in paragraph (4) a period was added at the end of the second sentence and a comma was added following "presentation" the second time it appeared in division (4)(B)(ii)(III).

Editor's notes.

- Ga. L. 2001, Ex. Sess., p. 312, § 4, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "This Act is not intended to, and should not be construed to, affect the legality of the repair, transport, possession, or use of otherwise prohibited gambling devices on maritime vessels within the jurisdiction of the State of Georgia. To the extent that such repair, transport, possession, or use was lawful prior to the enactment of this Act, it shall not be prohibited by this Act; and to the extent that such repair, transport, possession, or use was prohibited prior to the enactment of this Act, it shall not be permitted by this Act."

Ga. L. 2001, Ex. Sess., p. 312, § 5, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "During the period beginning January 1, 2002, and ending June 30, 2002, it shall not be unlawful to possess in this state a machine or device described in subparagraph (B), (C), or (D) of paragraph (2) of Code Section 16-12-20, if: (1) Such machine is not in use; (2) Such machine is in transit to a storage facility or in a storage facility, which said storage facility is a secured facility and no part of same is accessible by anyone other than employees of said facility or employees of the owner of said machine; and (3) Such machine is not located in a place which is open to the public and is not located in a private club."

Ga. L. 2012, p. 1136, § 4/SB 431, not codified by the General Assembly, provides, in part, that this Code section shall apply to conduct that occurs on and after May 2, 2012. It is not the intention of this Act to abate any prosecution undertaken for conduct occurring under the law in effect prior to such date, and any offense committed before May 2, 2012, shall be prosecuted and punished under the statutes in effect at the time the offense was committed.

Law reviews.

- For note discussing organized crime in Georgia with respect to the application of state gambling laws, and suggesting proposals for combatting organized crime, see 7 Ga. St. B.J. 124 (1970). For comment on Boyd v. Piggly Wiggly S., Inc., 115 Ga. App. 628, 155 S.E.2d 630 (1967), see 2 Ga. L. Rev. 132 (1967).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Editor's notes.

- Editor's notes. - In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Penal Code 1895, § 406, former Penal Code 1910, §§ 397 and 398, and former Code 1933, §§ 26-6501 and 26-6502, as they read prior to revision of this title by Ga. L. 1968, p. 1249, are included in the annotations for this Code section.

Applying the "actual use" test to case concerning confiscation of gambling equipment, evidence was not sufficient to subject the equipment to confiscation where it was not shown that it was actually used for gambling. Monte Carlo Parties, Ltd. v. Webb, 253 Ga. 508, 322 S.E.2d 246 (1984).

It was error to use the functional use test to find that video poker game machines were gambling devices. To reason that a machine is a gambling device merely because it mimics a card game that "historically" had been used for gambling is much the same as saying the machine is a gambling device because it could be used for gambling purposes, whether it is actually so used or not. This is the functional use test rejected in Monte Carlo Parties, Ltd. v. Webb, 253 Ga. 508, 322 S.E.2d 246 (1984). Webb v. City of Rossville, 198 Ga. App. 294, 401 S.E.2d 312 (1991).

One may be acquitted of gambling but convicted of operating a gambling house.

- Gambling is one thing and operating a gambling house is a kindred but entirely different thing and different evidence is required to convict of these separate offenses. No absurdity or repugnancy is created by acquittal of gambling and conviction of operating a gambling house. McGahee v. State, 133 Ga. App. 964, 213 S.E.2d 91 (1975).

In a lottery, there must be union of consideration, chance, and prize. Barker v. State, 56 Ga. App. 705, 193 S.E. 605 (1937) (decided under former Code 1933, §§ 26-6501, 26-6502); Harrington v. State, 97 Ga. App. 315, 103 S.E.2d 126 (1958) (decided under former Code 1933, §§ 26-6501, 26-6502); Boyd v. Piggly Wiggly S., Inc., 115 Ga. App. 628, 155 S.E.2d 630 (1967), for comment, see 2 Ga. L. Rev. 132 (1967) (decided under former Code 1933, § 26-6501).

Three essentials of a lottery are consideration, prize, and chance. Equitable Loan & Sec. Co. v. Waring, 117 Ga. 599, 44 S.E. 320, 97 Am. St. R. 177, 62 L.R.A. 93 (1903); Sparkman v. State, 209 Ga. App. 763, 434 S.E.2d 564 (1993) (decided under former Penal Code 1895, § 406).

It matters not that value of thing hazarded is small or infinitesimal.

- "Lottery" imports a scheme or device for hazarding of money or other thing of value by chance. It matters not that value of thing hazarded is small or infinitesimal if in fact it does have some value. AAA Amusements, Inc. v. State, 106 Ga. App. 663, 127 S.E.2d 919 (1962) (decided under former Code 1933, §§ 26-6501, 26-6502).

When only priority of payment is determined by chance, scheme does not constitute lottery. Equitable Loan & Sec. Co. v. Waring, 117 Ga. 599, 44 S.E. 320, 97 Am. St. R. 177, 62 L.R.A. 93 (1903) (decided under former Penal Code 1895, § 406).

Gift enterprise defined.

- Gift enterprise is a sporting artifice by which, for example a merchant or tradesman sells wares for their market value, but, by way of inducement, gives to each purchaser a ticket which entitles the purchaser to a chance to win certain prizes, to be determined after the manner of a lottery. Barker v. State, 56 Ga. App. 705, 193 S.E. 605 (1937) (decided under former Code 1933, § 26-6501).

For definitions of "chance," "similar scheme," and "gift enterprise," see Russell v. Equitable & Sec. Co., 129 Ga. 154, 58 S.E. 881, 12 Ann. Cas. 129 (1907) (decided under former Penal Code 1895, § 406).

Punchboard constituting gambling device.

- See Hobbs v. K. & S. Sales Co., 35 Ga. App. 226, 132 S.E. 775 (1926) (decided under former Penal Code 1910, § 397).

Slot machines are not for amusement when played for something of value.

- An apparatus known as a slot machine, by which a person depositing money therein may, by chance, get directly or indirectly money or articles or value worth either more or less than money deposited, falls within purview of former Code 1933, §§ 26-6501, 26-6502, and cannot be treated as one kept only for amusement. Childs v. State, 70 Ga. App. 99, 27 S.E.2d 470 (1943) (decided under former Code 1933, §§ 26-6501, 26-6502).

Possession of machines designed for gambling purposes.

- Possession of machines designed for gambling purposes is illegal under the Georgia Video Poker Act of 2001, O.C.G.A. § 16-12-20 et seq. Jones v. State, 276 Ga. App. 810, 625 S.E.2d 4 (2005).

One may be guilty of operating a gambling house without participating in actual gambling. Miller v. State, 48 Ga. App. 786, 173 S.E. 491 (1934) (decided under former Code 1933, §§ 26-6501, 26-6502).

"Gambling devices."

- Trial court did not err in allowing the witnesses in defendant's trial for possession of illegal gambling machines to testify that the machines were "gambling devices," as the jury had to determine whether defendant sold a machine that detectives testified was set up for gambling to a witness, who then sold the machine to the detectives, and whether that machine was illegal under O.C.G.A. § 16-12-20(2); describing the machines the detectives seized as "gambling machines" did not answer those questions. Jones v. State, 276 Ga. App. 810, 625 S.E.2d 4 (2005).

Actions converted amusement machines into gambling devices.

- Judgment approving forfeiture was affirmed because by giving players cash and lottery tickets as rewards for winning games on the amusement machines, the gas station employees effectively converted the machines into gambling devices under O.C.G.A. § 16-12-32(b)(4), which clearly violated the gambling laws of Georgia prohibiting cash payouts for winning games on machines when the winnings are determined by chance even if the games involve an element of skill. Patel v. State of Ga., 341 Ga. App. 419, 801 S.E.2d 551 (2017).

Cited in Tierce v. State, 122 Ga. App. 845, 178 S.E.2d 913 (1970); St. John's Melkite Catholic Church v. Commissioner of Revenue, 240 Ga. 733, 242 S.E.2d 108 (1978); Drewry v. State, 201 Ga. App. 674, 411 S.E.2d 898 (1991); State v. Old South Amusements, Inc., 275 Ga. 274, 564 S.E.2d 710 (2002).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Editor's notes.

- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, opinions under former Code 1933, §§ 26-6501 and 26-6502 are included in the annotations for this Code section.

Electronic slot machines are gambling devices per se; the slot machines are contraband; the slot machines can be seized and destroyed as contraband; possession of such devices is a crime; no demonstration of operation of any such device is necessary antecedent to the machine's seizure, nor is any demonstration necessary to establish basis of criminal prosecution for possession of that device. 1971 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 71-167.

Fund-raising activities constituting gambling.

- Certain fund-raising activities, often for charitable purposes and generally designated as "Las Vegas Night" or "Casino Night," constitute gambling or commercial gambling and the equipment used at these activities is gambling paraphernalia. 1983 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 83-48.

Pinball machines operated for amusement and not gaming or gambling are legal.

- Keeping, maintaining or employing of slot machines is a misdemeanor, however, keeping, maintaining or employing of pinball machines is not illegal where they are operated for purpose of amusement and no gaming or gambling is connected with their operation. 1945-47 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 104 (decided under former Code 1933, § 26-6502).

Only if a coin-operated game can register more than fifteen free replays and has a "trip switch" allowing games to be erased other than by reactivating the machine for additional plays is the device a prohibited gambling device; if such a game is for bona fide amusement purposes only, it is legal. However, the transfer of anything of value in exchange for a free replay on any coin operated device, whether or not the device constitutes a gambling device per se, is illegal. 1990 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 90-15.

Video slot machine which involves no skill in the machine's operation and offers a ticket for a value of up to $5.00 in merchandise is a "gambling device". 1996 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U96-18.

Operation of a sweepstakes where a player can determine if the player has the "winning number" by calling a "dial-it" number is a "lottery," as that term is defined by O.C.G.A. § 16-12-20. 1984 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 84-83.

Gift-enterprise and sweepstake schemes constitute lotteries, and are prohibited in Georgia. 1973 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U73-115.

Bonuses or rebates to customers who provide for additional sales of produce are not lotteries. 1962 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 447 (decided under former Code 1933, § 26-6501).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 38 Am. Jur. 2d, Gambling, §§ 5 et seq., 64, 65.

C.J.S.

- 38 C.J.S., Gaming, §§ 1, 2, 11 et seq., 147 et seq.

ALR.

- Loan or investment association as a lottery, 28 A.L.R. 1311.

Scheme by which award depends upon votes as a lottery, 41 A.L.R. 1484.

Scheme for advertising or stimulating legitimate business as a lottery, 48 A.L.R. 1115; 57 A.L.R. 424; 103 A.L.R. 866; 109 A.L.R. 709; 113 A.L.R. 1121.

Slot vending machine as gambling device, 81 A.L.R. 177.

Coin-operated or slot machines as lottery, 101 A.L.R. 1126.

"Numbers (or number) game" or "policy game" as a lottery, 105 A.L.R. 305.

Constitutionality of statute prohibiting giving of premiums or trading stamps with purchases of commodities, 124 A.L.R. 341; 133 A.L.R. 1087.

Slot machine within prohibitory statute or ordinance as limited to gambling device, 132 A.L.R. 1004.

What are games of chance, games of skill, and mixed games of chance and skill, 135 A.L.R. 104.

Punchboard as a lottery, 163 A.L.R. 1279.

Coin-operated pinball machine or similar device, played for amusement only or confining reward to privilege of free replays, as prohibited or permitted by antigambling laws, 89 A.L.R.2d 815.

Bridge as within gambling laws, 97 A.L.R.2d 1420.

Paraphernalia or appliances used for recording gambling transactions or receiving or furnishing gambling information as gaming "devices" within criminal statute or ordinance, 1 A.L.R.3d 726.

Validity of pyramid distribution plan, 54 A.L.R.3d 217.

Validity of statute or ordinance prohibiting or regulating bookmaking or pool selling, 80 A.L.R.4th 1079.

Right to recover money lent for gambling purposes, 74 A.L.R.5th 369.

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 16-12-20

Total Results: 7  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

State v. Old South Amusements, Inc., 564 S.E.2d 710 (Ga. 2002).

Cited 25 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | May 28, 2002 | 275 Ga. 274, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 1497

...SB2EX2, commonly known as the Video Poker Act, is unconstitutional. We hold that it is not, and reverse the trial court's judgment to the contrary. The Video Poker Act was adopted by the legislature and signed into law on September 15, 2001, to be effective January 1, 2002. The act amends OCGA §§ 16-12-20, 16-12-35, and 48-17-1, by criminalizing the use and possession of video poker amusement machines....
...In this case, as in Menken, the new law does not take business property for a public use; it merely requires an already regulated business to adjust its property to the new law. [9] Judgments reversed. All the Justices concur. NOTES [1] This subparagraph restates OCGA § 16-12-20(2) verbatim....
Copy

Patel v. State, 713 S.E.2d 381 (Ga. 2011).

Cited 18 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jul 5, 2011 | 289 Ga. 479

...ent "winning" events by the players, in that they did not produce payouts greater than that initially placed into the machines. However, illegal gambling is not contingent upon a player winning, but upon the opportunity for a player to win. See OCGA § 16-12-20(1), (2)(A)....
...took to the store cash register and exchanged for $10. On October 29, a C.I., after inserting $20 into a video gaming machine, and playing it for a few minutes, received from the machine a printed ticket, which the C.I. took to the store cash register and exchanged for $ 10. [9] OCGA § 16-12-20 reads in pertinent part: (1) "Bet" means an agreement that, dependent upon chance even though accompanied by some skill, one stands to win or lose something of value....
...This subsection shall not apply, however, to any game or device classified by the United States government as requiring a federal gaming stamp under applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code or any item described as a gambling device in subparagraph (B), (C), or (D) of paragraph (2) of Code Section 16-12-20....
Copy

Damani v. State, 667 S.E.2d 372 (Ga. 2008).

Cited 18 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Sep 22, 2008 | 284 Ga. 372, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 2955

...alysis of the applicable law, and the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to each game machine. The trial court concluded that four of the eleven game machines were gambling devices subject to condemnation pursuant to OCGA §§ 16-12-20 and 16-12-35, but that seven of the game machines were not....
Copy

Izzo v. State, 356 S.E.2d 204 (Ga. 1987).

Cited 15 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | May 27, 1987 | 257 Ga. 109

...d.) OCGA § 16-12-32 (a) defines "property" as being "any personal property of any type, tangible or intangible, including but not limited to vehicles, conveyances, aircraft, watercraft, funds, other things of value or choses in action . . . ." OCGA § 16-12-20 (3) defines "gambling place" as being "any real estate, building, room, tent, vehicle, boat, or other property whatsoever, one of the principal uses of which is the making or settling of bets; the receiving, holding, recording, or forward...
...We conclude that OCGA § 16-12-32 (b) is not vague in light of the circumstances in question in this case — the seizure of "funds" within a "gambling place." This is so because the provisions of the statute relied on by the state to seize the appellants' money are not vague. First, the definition of "gambling place" in § 16-12-20 (3) is sufficiently clear to warn persons of ordinary intelligence of what places to avoid, and is sufficiently clear to discourage or preclude arbitrary enforcement decisions concerning what places constitute "gambling places." Moreover,...
...ng reasons we affirm the trial court's decision upholding the constitutionality of § 16-12-32. 2. We also reject the appellants' argument that the evidence failed to establish that the Nobility Club was a "gambling place" within the meaning of OCGA § 16-12-20 (3)....
Copy

Monte Carlo Parties, Ltd. v. Webb, 322 S.E.2d 246 (Ga. 1984).

Cited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 6, 1984 | 253 Ga. 508

...ness activity was not illegal and requested the court to enjoin Solicitor Webb from fulfilling his threat to prosecute, at least until the declaratory action was settled. Monte Carlo also requested that the court find Georgia's gambling laws, OCGA §§ 16-12-20 (2), 16-12-24, 16-12-30 and 16-12-32, unconstitutional....
...ideration. Though support of the arts is certainly a worthy end, charities are not exempt from the law, and the trial court did not err in holding these means to that end illegal. The third format used by Monte Carlo would violate the law. 3. OCGA §§ 16-12-20 (2) and 16-12-24 punish a person for knowingly possessing goods designed for gambling, or gambling devices....
Copy

Ultra Telecom, Inc. v. State, 701 S.E.2d 144 (Ga. 2010).

Cited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 4, 2010 | 288 Ga. 65, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 3194

...For the following reasons, we reverse the Court of Appeals. 1. The State of Georgia, by and through the District Attorney of Cobb County, brought civil condemnation actions against various game machines owned or leased by appellants claiming that they were illegal gambling devices in violation of OCGA § 16-12-20 et seq....
...Damani, supra, 299 Ga.App. at 116(1)(b), 681 S.E.2d 635. The majority opinion recognized that "[t]he term `a single play of the game or device' is key to our analysis," id., but noted that "[u]nfortunately, it is not defined in the statute. See OCGA § 16-12-20." Id....
...at 118(1)(c), 681 S.E.2d 635, our holding above makes it necessary for us to address the State's contention that OCGA § 16-12-35 is not applicable to the game machines at issue and the trial court's ruling should be reversed because the machines are illegal gambling devices as defined in OCGA § 16-12-20(2)(B), (C) and (D). [3] In particular, the State argues that the trial court erred as a matter of law by holding that a slot machine, as defined in OCGA § 16-12-20(2)(B), is limited to those types of slot games in which a player wins rewards through "pure chance." The State asserts the trial court should have construed OCGA § 16-12-20(2)(B) to go beyond the traditional definition of "slot machine" so as to create an absolute prohibition, such that no game or device that possesses slot machine characteristics may ever qualify as a bona fide amusement game or device unde...
...e of considerable skill in its operation to obtain rewards and complies with the redemption provisions in subsection (d)(2) of that statute. The definition the trial court used, however, was based on this Court's discussion of "slot machine" in OCGA § 16-12-20(2)(B) in State of Ga. v. Old South Amusements, Inc., 275 Ga. 274, 276(1), n. 2, 564 S.E.2d 710 (2002) ("[a] `slot machine' is a well recognized device for the hazarding of money [cits.]") and our express recognition therein that the terms in OCGA § 16-12-20(2), including "slot machine," "all possess common meaning ......
...findings in this regard are clearly erroneous. See generally Lyon v. State of Ga., 230 Ga.App. 264, 495 S.E.2d 899 (1998). 4. Our Constitution prohibits gambling, Art. I, Sec. II, Par. VIII(a), and our statutes outlaw illegal gambling devices. OCGA § 16-12-20 et seq....
...775, 776(2), 684 S.E.2d 271 (2009). This rule of statutory construction is particularly apt here where the newly enacted OCGA § 48-17-1(7.1) specifically references OCGA § 16-12-35 as the source for the term "single play" that it is defining. [3] OCGA § 16-12-20(2) defines "gambling device" as: (B) Any slot machine or any simulation or variation thereof; (C) Any matchup or lineup game machine or device, operated for any consideration, in which two or more numerals, symbols, letters, or icons alig...
...This subsection shall not apply, however, to any game or device classified by the United States government as requiring a federal gaming stamp under applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code or any item described as a gambling device in subparagraph (B), (C), or (D) of paragraph (2) of Code Section 16-12-20.

In the Matter of Stephanie Dianne Woodard (Ga. 2026).

Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jan 5, 2026 | 288 Ga. 65, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 3194