Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Code 1933, § 26-2015, enacted by Ga. L. 1968, p. 1249, § 1; Ga. L. 1970, p. 236, § 4; Ga. L. 1988, p. 1797, § 2; Ga. L. 1992, p. 6, § 16; Ga. L. 1998, p. 1301, § 2; Ga. L. 2001, p. 92, § 4; Ga. L. 2003, p. 878, § 1.1; Ga. L. 2011, p. 217, § 2/HB 200; Ga. L. 2017, p. 489, § 3/HB 341.)
The 2011 amendment, effective July 1, 2011, redesignated former subsection (b) as present paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(3); in paragraph (b)(1), substituted "A person convicted of any of the offenses enumerated in Code Sections 16-6-10 through 16-6-12 when such offense involves the conduct of a person who is at least 16 but less than 18 years of age" for "A person convicted of keeping a place of prostitution, pimping, or pandering when such offense involves keeping a place of prostitution for, the pimping for, or the solicitation of a person under the age of 18 years to perform an act of prostitution or the assembly of two or more persons under the age of 18 years at a fixed place for the purpose of being solicited by others to perform an act of prostitution" at the beginning, substituted "20 years, a fine of" for "20 years and such convicted person shall be fined" near the end, and added ", or both" at the end; added paragraph (b)(2); and deleted "when such offense involves keeping a place of prostitution for, the pimping for, or pandering of a person under the age of 18 years" following "second or subsequent offense" in the middle of paragraph (b)(3).
The 2017 amendment, effective July 1, 2017, substituted the present provisions of subsection (a) for the former provisions, which read: "Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b) of this Code section, a person convicted of any of the offenses enumerated in Code Sections 16-6-10 through 16-6-12 shall be punished as for a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature. A person convicted of the offense enumerated in Code Section 16-6-9 shall be punished as for a misdemeanor.".
- Affirmative defense to certain sexual crimes, § 16-3-6.
Registered offenders residing within areas where minors congregate, § 42-1-13.
- Ga. L. 2001, p. 92, §§ 1 and 2, not codified by the General Assembly, provide: "This Act shall be known and may be cited as the 'Child Sexual Commerce Prevention Act of 2001.' The General Assembly acknowledges that children are increasingly induced, coerced, or compelled to perform sexual acts for the financial benefit of third parties. The General Assembly enacts this law to express its abhorrence for these practices and to better protect children from sexual exploitation."
- For review of 1998 legislation relating to crimes and offenses, see 15 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 69 (1998). For article on the 2011 amendment of this Code section, see 28 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 131 (2011). For article, "Crimes and Offenses: Crimes Against the Person," see 28 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 131 (2011). For annual survey on criminal law, see 69 Mercer L. Rev. 73 (2017). For note on the 2001 amendment to this Code section, see 18 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 32 (2001).
- Counsel was not ineffective for failing to request a jury instruction on the crime of pimping as a lesser-included offense of trafficking a minor for sexual servitude without the use of coercion because the jury found the defendant guilty on the three trafficking without coercion counts and on three related counts charging the greater offense of trafficking the victim for sexual servitude through the use of coercion; thus, the defendant did not meet the defendant's burden of showing that there was a reasonable possibility that the jury would have acquitted the defendant on all of the indicted offenses and, instead, convicted the defendant only of pimping if counsel had requested a jury instruction on pimping as a lesser-included offense. Byrd v. State, 344 Ga. App. 780, 811 S.E.2d 85 (2018).
- Trial court did not err by sentencing defendant for felony pimping, instead of only a misdemeanor count of pimping, as defendant was charged with instructing a person to commit the act of prostitution and receiving money therefrom, which was a clear violation of O.C.G.A. § 16-6-11(4), and because the indictment alleged that the person whom defendant instructed was under the age of 18 years, the crime of pimping was elevated to a felony under O.C.G.A. § 16-6-13(b). Burroughs v. State, 292 Ga. App. 580, 665 S.E.2d 4 (2008), cert. denied, No. S08C1930, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 930 (Ga. 2008).
- Counsel was not ineffective for failing to request a jury instruction on the crime of pimping as a lesser-included offense of trafficking a minor for sexual servitude without the use of coercion because counsel believed that requesting an instruction on pimping as a lesser-included offense would have eliminated any chance of obtaining a full acquittal on all charges; and requesting a pimping instruction would have given the jury the opportunity to acquit the defendant on the sexual trafficking charges, but still find the defendant guilty of pimping, and that potential outcome outweighed any benefit to the defendant as pimping carried a substantial sentence that was comparable to that of trafficking for sexual servitude without coercion. Byrd v. State, 344 Ga. App. 780, 811 S.E.2d 85 (2018).
Cited in Sutton v. Garmon, 245 Ga. 685, 266 S.E.2d 497 (1980).
Total Results: 4
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-06-22
Snippet: prostitution in his or her own behalf . . . .”); 16-6-13 (b) (2) (making a conviction under § 16-6-12 a
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-02-01
Snippet: or some part of a sentence. See, e.g., OCGA §§ 16-6-13 (a) (1) (upon conviction for keeping a place of
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2009-11-23
Citation: 686 S.E.2d 777, 286 Ga. 245, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 3663, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 735
Snippet: expressly refer for a definition, see, e.g., OCGA §§ 16-6-13.2 (provision on forfeiture of motor vehicles used
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1994-10-31
Citation: 264 Ga. 583, 449 S.E.2d 87, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 3570, 1994 Ga. LEXIS 868
Snippet: and solicitation of sodomy of an adult, OCGA § 16-6-13 (a). In the earlier appearance of this disciplinary