Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448is under 16 years of age on the date of the violation, the applicable period within which a prosecution shall be commenced under Code Section 17-3-1 or other applicable statute shall not begin to run until the victim has reached the age of 16 or the violation is reported to a law enforcement agency, prosecuting attorney, or other governmental agency, whichever occurs earlier. Such law enforcement agency or other governmental agency shall promptly report such allegation to the appropriate prosecuting attorney.
is under 16 years of age on the date of the violation and the violation is not subject to punishment as provided in paragraph (2) of subsection (b) of Code Section 16-6-4, paragraph (2) of subsection (d) of Code Section 16-6-4, or subsection (c) of Code Section 16-6-5, a prosecution may be commenced at any time.
(Code 1981, §17-3-2.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1992, p. 2973, § 1; Ga. L. 2012, p. 899, § 4-2/HB 1176.)
The 2012 amendment, effective July 1, 2012, substituted the present provisions of subsection (a) for the former provisions, which read: "(a) If the victim of a violation of:
"(1) Code Section 16-5-70, relating to cruelty to children;
"(2) Code Section 16-6-1, relating to rape;
"(3) Code Section 16-6-2, relating to sodomy and aggravated sodomy;
"(4) Code Section 16-6-3, relating to statutory rape;
"(5) Code Section 16-6-4, relating to child molestation and aggravated child molestation;
"(6) Code Section 16-6-5, relating to enticing a child for indecent purposes; or
"(7) Code Section 16-6-22, relating to incest,
"is under 16 years of age on the date of the violation, the applicable period within which a prosecution must be commenced under Code Section 17-3-1 or other applicable statute shall not begin to run until the victim has reached the age of 16 or the violation is reported to a law enforcement agency, prosecuting attorney, or other governmental agency, whichever occurs earlier. Such law enforcement agency or other governmental agency shall promptly report such allegation to the appropriate prosecuting attorney."; and substituted the present provisions of subsection (b) for the former provisions, which read: "This Code section shall apply to any offense designated in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) of this Code section occurring on or after July 1, 1992." See editor's note for applicability.
- Ga. L. 2012, p. 899, § 9-1(a)/HB 1176, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: "This Act shall become effective on July 1, 2012, and shall apply to offenses which occur on or after that date. Any offense occurring before July 1, 2012, shall be governed by the statute in effect at the time of such offense and shall be considered a prior conviction for the purpose of imposing a sentence that provides for a different penalty for a subsequent conviction for the same type of offense, of whatever degree or level, pursuant to this Act."
- For annual survey of criminal law, see 56 Mercer L. Rev. 153 (2004). For article on the 2012 amendment of this Code section, see 29 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 290 (2012). For note on 1992 enactment of this Code section, see 9 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 231 (1992). For note, "Give It to Me, I'm Worth It: The Need to Amend Georgia's Record Restriction Statute to Provide Ex-Offenders with a Second Chance in the Employment Sector," see 52 Ga. L. Rev. 267 (2017).
- O.C.G.A. § 17-3-2.1 evidences the legislature's intent that statutes of limitation for certain crimes against minors should be tolled by the infancy of the victim until such time as the victim is 16 years of age or until the violation is reported to law enforcement authorities, whichever is earlier. Johnston v. State, 213 Ga. App. 579, 445 S.E.2d 566 (1994).
In a case in which the defendant orally sodomized a child victim between 1992 and 1995 and the victim turned 16 during the 1997 trial, the evidence of aggravated child molestation fell within the applicable statute of limitation, O.C.G.A. § 17-3-2.1(a) and (b). Brock v. State, 270 Ga. App. 250, 605 S.E.2d 907 (2004).
- Because O.C.G.A. § 17-3-2.1(a) provides that if a victim of child molestation is under 16 years of age on the date of the offense, then the period within which the prosecution must be commenced under O.C.G.A. § 17-3-1 shall not begin to run until the victim has reached the age of 16, the seven year statute of limitations period did not run until the victim turned 16 yeas of age, and an indictment against the defendant that was returned within that seven-year period was timely. Tompkins v. State, 265 Ga. App. 760, 595 S.E.2d 599 (2004).
- Because an underage sexual abuse victim did not report molestation by the defendant until December 2001, the seven-year statute of limitations did not even begin to run until that time, pursuant to O.C.G.A. §§ 17-3-1(c) and17-3-2.1(a); further, the defendant's own statement that the defendant only knew the victim for two or three years would have been sufficient to show that the molestation took place at some point within the limitations period. Porter v. State, 270 Ga. App. 860, 608 S.E.2d 315 (2004).
Trial court's denial of the defendant's motion for a directed verdict of acquittal, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 17-9-1, on two counts of child molestation in violation of O.C.G.A. § 16-6-4, was proper because the evidence of defendant's inappropriate sexual abuse of the victim, defendant's son, sufficiently placed the dates of the charged offenses within the seven-year limitations period of O.C.G.A. §§ 17-3-1(c) and17-3-2.1(a)(5). Allen v. State, 275 Ga. App. 826, 622 S.E.2d 54 (2005).
Trial court did not err in granting the defendant's plea in bar to dismiss the counts of an indictment charging the defendant with child molestation and aggravated child molestation to a child under the age of 14 because the state failed to indict the defendant within the limitation period, O.C.G.A. § 17-3-1(c); because the state did not allege that the victim was under the age of 16, the tolling provision of O.C.G.A. § 17-3-2.1 was not invoked. State v. Godfrey, 309 Ga. App. 234, 709 S.E.2d 572 (2011).
Trial court erred in dismissing the counts of the indictment charging the defendant with aggravated child molestation, child molestation, and statutory rape with a child under the age of 16 because the indictment sufficiently invoked the tolling provision of O.C.G.A. § 17-3-2.1; pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 17-3-1(c), the state had seven years to indict the defendant, and the defendant was indicted within seven years. State v. Godfrey, 309 Ga. App. 234, 709 S.E.2d 572 (2011).
Pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 17-3-2.1(a), the statutory period did not begin to run, at the earliest, until November 9, 2004, when one of the victims reached 16 years of age. Further, the counts alleged that the defendant committed the offenses against a child under the age of 16, which sufficiently invoked the statute of limitation tolling provision set forth in § 17-3-2.1. Mosby v. State, 319 Ga. App. 642, 738 S.E.2d 98 (2013).
- With regard to a defendant's conviction for forcible rape of the defendant's child during the time the child was 13 through 15 years of age, the trial court correctly concluded that the state had 15 years from the victim's 16th birthday on January 12, 1995, or until January 12, 2010, to prosecute the case; therefore, no ex post facto violation occurred since the indictment was filed on January 8, 2008. Duke v. State, 298 Ga. App. 719, 681 S.E.2d 174 (2009), cert. denied, No. S09C1866, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 31 (Ga. 2010).
With regard to a defendant's conviction for rape of a minor relative, the trial court did not err by denying the defendant's motion for a new trial on the ground that the applicable statute of limitations ran on the rape offenses before the defendant was charged because in applying the 1996 amendment to O.C.G.A. § 17-3-1 and the tolling provisions of O.C.G.A. § 17-3-2.1, the limitation period for the defendant's crime ran 15 years from December 13, 1995, when the crimes were first reported to authorities. Thus, because the state had until December 13, 2010 to indict the defendant, the January 7, 2008, indictment was timely and no ex post facto violation arose because the original seven-year limitation period had not expired at the time. Flournoy v. State, 299 Ga. App. 377, 682 S.E.2d 632 (2009).
- Indictment alleging the molestation of a child under the age of 16 sufficiently invoked the statute of limitation tolling provision set forth in O.C.G.A. § 17-3-2.1. Lyde v. State, 311 Ga. App. 512, 716 S.E.2d 572 (2011).
- Superior court did not err in failing to grant the defendant's plea in bar, motion to dismiss, and general demurrer to prohibit prosecution of the non-murder counts in the indictment as barred by the applicable statutes of limitation because the record did not support a finding that the state had actual knowledge that there was criminal wrongdoing resulting in the fatality, much less that the defendant would be charged as the perpetrator of the victim's death, until the superseding medical examiner's report. Higgenbottom v. State, 290 Ga. 198, 719 S.E.2d 482 (2011).
Cited in State v. Outen, 296 Ga. 40, 764 S.E.2d 848 (2014).
Total Results: 9
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-08-13
Snippet: offenses must commence, while OCGA §§ 17-3-2, 17-3-2.1, and 17-3-2.2 specify periods that are excluded
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2023-08-21
Snippet: (a) At trial, the State alleged that OCGA § 17-3-2 (1) applied to toll the seven- and four-year statutes
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2021-08-24
Snippet: failed to allege in the indictment that OCGA § 17-3-2.1 (a) tolled the applicable statute of limitation
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-06-24
Citation: 830 S.E.2d 143, 306 Ga. 216
Snippet: (1) (a) 604 S.E.2d 789 (2004). However, OCGA § 17-3-2 (1) provides, in relevant part, that "[t]he period
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-10-20
Citation: 296 Ga. 40, 764 S.E.2d 848, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 812
Snippet: offenses must commence, while OCGA §§ 17-3-2, 17-3-2.1, and 17-3-2.2 specify periods that are excluded
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-02-18
Citation: 292 Ga. 557, 738 S.E.2d 584, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 299, 2013 WL 593494, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 145
Snippet: (b) Except as otherwise provided in Code Section 17-3-2.1, prosecution for other crimes punishable by death
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-11-29
Citation: 719 S.E.2d 482, 290 Ga. 198, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3859, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 944
Snippet: 397 (1979). [3] It should be noted that OCGA § 17-3-2.1 expressly excludes from periods of limitation
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2004-11-08
Citation: 604 S.E.2d 789, 278 Ga. 598, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 3579, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 960
Snippet: limitations. OCGA § 17-3-1(a). [3] See OCGA § 17-3-2(1), (2). [4] OCGA § 17-3-1(b). [5] OCGA § 17-3-1(c)
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1992-07-16
Citation: 418 S.E.2d 45, 262 Ga. 349, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 1429, 1992 Ga. LEXIS 576
Snippet: begun prior to June 1, 1988. However, OCGA § 17-3-2 (1) provides: The period within which a prosecution