Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 17-3-2.1 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 17 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Section 3. Limitations on Prosecution, 17-3-1 through 17-3-3.

17-3-2.1. Exclusions for certain offenses involving a victim under 16 years of age.

  1. For crimes committed during the period beginning on July 1, 1992, and ending on June 30, 2012, if the victim of a violation of:
    1. Cruelty to children, as defined in Code Section 16-5-70;
    2. Rape, as defined in Code Section 16-6-1;
    3. Sodomy or aggravated sodomy, as defined in Code Section 16-6-2;
    4. Statutory rape, as defined in Code Section 16-6-3;
    5. Child molestation or aggravated child molestation, as defined in Code Section 16-6-4;
    6. Enticing a child for indecent purposes, as defined in Code Section 16-6-5; or
    7. Incest, as defined in Code Section 16-6-22,

      is under 16 years of age on the date of the violation, the applicable period within which a prosecution shall be commenced under Code Section 17-3-1 or other applicable statute shall not begin to run until the victim has reached the age of 16 or the violation is reported to a law enforcement agency, prosecuting attorney, or other governmental agency, whichever occurs earlier. Such law enforcement agency or other governmental agency shall promptly report such allegation to the appropriate prosecuting attorney.

  2. For crimes committed on and after July 1, 2012, if the victim of a violation of:
    1. Trafficking a person for sexual servitude, as defined in Code Section 16-5-46;
    2. Cruelty to children in the first degree, as defined in Code Section 16-5-70;
    3. Rape, as defined in Code Section 16-6-1;
    4. Aggravated sodomy, as defined in Code Section 16-6-2;
    5. Child molestation or aggravated child molestation, as defined in Code Section 16-6-4;
    6. Enticing a child for indecent purposes, as defined in Code Section 16-6-5; or
    7. Incest, as defined in Code Section 16-6-22,

      is under 16 years of age on the date of the violation and the violation is not subject to punishment as provided in paragraph (2) of subsection (b) of Code Section 16-6-4, paragraph (2) of subsection (d) of Code Section 16-6-4, or subsection (c) of Code Section 16-6-5, a prosecution may be commenced at any time.

(Code 1981, §17-3-2.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1992, p. 2973, § 1; Ga. L. 2012, p. 899, § 4-2/HB 1176.)

The 2012 amendment, effective July 1, 2012, substituted the present provisions of subsection (a) for the former provisions, which read: "(a) If the victim of a violation of:

"(1) Code Section 16-5-70, relating to cruelty to children;

"(2) Code Section 16-6-1, relating to rape;

"(3) Code Section 16-6-2, relating to sodomy and aggravated sodomy;

"(4) Code Section 16-6-3, relating to statutory rape;

"(5) Code Section 16-6-4, relating to child molestation and aggravated child molestation;

"(6) Code Section 16-6-5, relating to enticing a child for indecent purposes; or

"(7) Code Section 16-6-22, relating to incest,

"is under 16 years of age on the date of the violation, the applicable period within which a prosecution must be commenced under Code Section 17-3-1 or other applicable statute shall not begin to run until the victim has reached the age of 16 or the violation is reported to a law enforcement agency, prosecuting attorney, or other governmental agency, whichever occurs earlier. Such law enforcement agency or other governmental agency shall promptly report such allegation to the appropriate prosecuting attorney."; and substituted the present provisions of subsection (b) for the former provisions, which read: "This Code section shall apply to any offense designated in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) of this Code section occurring on or after July 1, 1992." See editor's note for applicability.

Editor's notes.

- Ga. L. 2012, p. 899, § 9-1(a)/HB 1176, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: "This Act shall become effective on July 1, 2012, and shall apply to offenses which occur on or after that date. Any offense occurring before July 1, 2012, shall be governed by the statute in effect at the time of such offense and shall be considered a prior conviction for the purpose of imposing a sentence that provides for a different penalty for a subsequent conviction for the same type of offense, of whatever degree or level, pursuant to this Act."

Law reviews.

- For annual survey of criminal law, see 56 Mercer L. Rev. 153 (2004). For article on the 2012 amendment of this Code section, see 29 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 290 (2012). For note on 1992 enactment of this Code section, see 9 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 231 (1992). For note, "Give It to Me, I'm Worth It: The Need to Amend Georgia's Record Restriction Statute to Provide Ex-Offenders with a Second Chance in the Employment Sector," see 52 Ga. L. Rev. 267 (2017).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Tolling statute of limitations for offenses against minors.

- O.C.G.A. § 17-3-2.1 evidences the legislature's intent that statutes of limitation for certain crimes against minors should be tolled by the infancy of the victim until such time as the victim is 16 years of age or until the violation is reported to law enforcement authorities, whichever is earlier. Johnston v. State, 213 Ga. App. 579, 445 S.E.2d 566 (1994).

In a case in which the defendant orally sodomized a child victim between 1992 and 1995 and the victim turned 16 during the 1997 trial, the evidence of aggravated child molestation fell within the applicable statute of limitation, O.C.G.A. § 17-3-2.1(a) and (b). Brock v. State, 270 Ga. App. 250, 605 S.E.2d 907 (2004).

Seven-year limitations period for child molestation tolled until victim was 16 years of age.

- Because O.C.G.A. § 17-3-2.1(a) provides that if a victim of child molestation is under 16 years of age on the date of the offense, then the period within which the prosecution must be commenced under O.C.G.A. § 17-3-1 shall not begin to run until the victim has reached the age of 16, the seven year statute of limitations period did not run until the victim turned 16 yeas of age, and an indictment against the defendant that was returned within that seven-year period was timely. Tompkins v. State, 265 Ga. App. 760, 595 S.E.2d 599 (2004).

Seven year statute of limitations.

- Because an underage sexual abuse victim did not report molestation by the defendant until December 2001, the seven-year statute of limitations did not even begin to run until that time, pursuant to O.C.G.A. §§ 17-3-1(c) and17-3-2.1(a); further, the defendant's own statement that the defendant only knew the victim for two or three years would have been sufficient to show that the molestation took place at some point within the limitations period. Porter v. State, 270 Ga. App. 860, 608 S.E.2d 315 (2004).

Trial court's denial of the defendant's motion for a directed verdict of acquittal, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 17-9-1, on two counts of child molestation in violation of O.C.G.A. § 16-6-4, was proper because the evidence of defendant's inappropriate sexual abuse of the victim, defendant's son, sufficiently placed the dates of the charged offenses within the seven-year limitations period of O.C.G.A. §§ 17-3-1(c) and17-3-2.1(a)(5). Allen v. State, 275 Ga. App. 826, 622 S.E.2d 54 (2005).

Trial court did not err in granting the defendant's plea in bar to dismiss the counts of an indictment charging the defendant with child molestation and aggravated child molestation to a child under the age of 14 because the state failed to indict the defendant within the limitation period, O.C.G.A. § 17-3-1(c); because the state did not allege that the victim was under the age of 16, the tolling provision of O.C.G.A. § 17-3-2.1 was not invoked. State v. Godfrey, 309 Ga. App. 234, 709 S.E.2d 572 (2011).

Trial court erred in dismissing the counts of the indictment charging the defendant with aggravated child molestation, child molestation, and statutory rape with a child under the age of 16 because the indictment sufficiently invoked the tolling provision of O.C.G.A. § 17-3-2.1; pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 17-3-1(c), the state had seven years to indict the defendant, and the defendant was indicted within seven years. State v. Godfrey, 309 Ga. App. 234, 709 S.E.2d 572 (2011).

Pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 17-3-2.1(a), the statutory period did not begin to run, at the earliest, until November 9, 2004, when one of the victims reached 16 years of age. Further, the counts alleged that the defendant committed the offenses against a child under the age of 16, which sufficiently invoked the statute of limitation tolling provision set forth in § 17-3-2.1. Mosby v. State, 319 Ga. App. 642, 738 S.E.2d 98 (2013).

Indictment filed within 15 year statute of limitations.

- With regard to a defendant's conviction for forcible rape of the defendant's child during the time the child was 13 through 15 years of age, the trial court correctly concluded that the state had 15 years from the victim's 16th birthday on January 12, 1995, or until January 12, 2010, to prosecute the case; therefore, no ex post facto violation occurred since the indictment was filed on January 8, 2008. Duke v. State, 298 Ga. App. 719, 681 S.E.2d 174 (2009), cert. denied, No. S09C1866, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 31 (Ga. 2010).

With regard to a defendant's conviction for rape of a minor relative, the trial court did not err by denying the defendant's motion for a new trial on the ground that the applicable statute of limitations ran on the rape offenses before the defendant was charged because in applying the 1996 amendment to O.C.G.A. § 17-3-1 and the tolling provisions of O.C.G.A. § 17-3-2.1, the limitation period for the defendant's crime ran 15 years from December 13, 1995, when the crimes were first reported to authorities. Thus, because the state had until December 13, 2010 to indict the defendant, the January 7, 2008, indictment was timely and no ex post facto violation arose because the original seven-year limitation period had not expired at the time. Flournoy v. State, 299 Ga. App. 377, 682 S.E.2d 632 (2009).

Allegation of molestation of a child under 16 sufficient to invoke tolling.

- Indictment alleging the molestation of a child under the age of 16 sufficiently invoked the statute of limitation tolling provision set forth in O.C.G.A. § 17-3-2.1. Lyde v. State, 311 Ga. App. 512, 716 S.E.2d 572 (2011).

State had no actual knowledge of criminal wrongdoing.

- Superior court did not err in failing to grant the defendant's plea in bar, motion to dismiss, and general demurrer to prohibit prosecution of the non-murder counts in the indictment as barred by the applicable statutes of limitation because the record did not support a finding that the state had actual knowledge that there was criminal wrongdoing resulting in the fatality, much less that the defendant would be charged as the perpetrator of the victim's death, until the superseding medical examiner's report. Higgenbottom v. State, 290 Ga. 198, 719 S.E.2d 482 (2011).

Cited in State v. Outen, 296 Ga. 40, 764 S.E.2d 848 (2014).

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 17-3-2.1

Total Results: 11  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Jenkins v. State, 604 S.E.2d 789 (Ga. 2004).

Cited 71 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 8, 2004 | 278 Ga. 598, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 3579

Copy

Vasquez v. State, 830 S.E.2d 143 (Ga. 2019).

Cited 27 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 24, 2019 | 306 Ga. 216

Copy

Harper v. State, 292 Ga. 557 (Ga. 2013).

Cited 23 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Feb 18, 2013 | 738 S.E.2d 584, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 299

...by the state, shall be suspended during the pendency of the prosecution or action by the state and for two years thereafter. OCGA § 17-3-1 reads: (a) A prosecution for murder may be commenced at any time. (b) Except as otherwise provided in Code Section 17-3-2.1, prosecution for other crimes punishable by death or life imprisonment shall be commenced within seven years after the commission of the crime except as provided by subsection (d) of this Code section; provided, however, that prosecution for the crime of forcible rape shall be commenced within 15 years after the commission of the crime. (c) Except as otherwise provided in Code Section 17-3-2.1, prosecution for felonies other than those specified in subsections (a), (b), and (d) of this Code section shall be commenced within four years after the commission of the crime, provided that prosecution for felonies committed again...
Copy

Higgenbottom v. State, 719 S.E.2d 482 (Ga. 2011).

Cited 22 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 29, 2011 | 290 Ga. 198, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3859

...accused may assert the right to a speedy trial prior to indictment, and the pre-indictment failure to assert the right may be weighed against the accused. Haisman v. State, 242 Ga. 896, 899(2), 252 S.E.2d 397 (1979). [3] It should be noted that OCGA § 17-3-2.1 expressly excludes from periods of limitation prosecution for certain offenses, including the situation of a victim of a violation of: OCGA § 16-5-70, relating to cruelty to children if the victim is under 16 years of age on the date of the violation....
Copy

State v. Outen, 296 Ga. 40 (Ga. 2014).

Cited 14 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 20, 2014 | 764 S.E.2d 848

...The basic law governing the statute of limitations in criminal cases is codified at OCGA §§ 17-3-1 to 17-3-3. Broadly speaking, § 17-3-1 limits the time within which a prosecution for particular offenses or categories of offenses must commence, while §§ 17-3-2, 17-3-2.1, and 17-3-2.2 specify periods that are excluded from the various limitations periods....
Copy

Danuel v. State, 418 S.E.2d 45 (Ga. 1992).

Cited 14 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jul 16, 1992 | 262 Ga. 349, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 1429

Copy

Moulder v. State, 891 S.E.2d 903 (Ga. 2023).

Cited 11 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Aug 21, 2023 | 317 Ga. 43

Copy

Garrison v. State, 905 S.E.2d 629 (Ga. 2024).

Cited 10 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Aug 13, 2024 | 319 Ga. 711

...See OCGA § 17-3-1 (e). But there are circumstances that can extend or pause the running of a limitations period. “Broadly speaking, OCGA § 17-3-1 limits the time within which a prosecution for particular offenses must commence, while OCGA §§ 17-3-2, 17-3-2.1, and 17-3-2.2 specify periods that are excluded from the various limitations periods[,]” known as tolling exceptions, and OCGA § 17-3-3 specifies circumstances that can warrant an extension of the statute of limitations....
...40, 42 (2) (764 SE2d 848) (2014). The State bears the burden to prove that a crime occurred within the statute of limitations. See Lewis v. State, 306 Ga. 455, 462-463 (4) (831 SE2d 771) (2019). Under our precedent, whether the State relies on an exception under OCGA §§ 17-3-2, 17-3-2.1, and 17-3-2.2 or an extension under OCGA § 17-3-3 generally determines 13 the State’s burden to allege and prove the application of such a provision....
...crime charged is theft by conversion of public property while such an officer or employee[,]” or “[t]he accused is a guardian or trustee and the crime charged is theft by conversion of property of the ward or beneficiary.” OCGA § 17-3-2. OCGA § 17-3-2.1 tolls the applicable time period only for particular crimes and only until the victim reaches a particular age or the violation is reported, whichever is first. See OCGA § 17-3-2.1....
Copy

Gebhardt v. State, 307 Ga. 587 (Ga. 2019).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Dec 23, 2019

...death of another counts had to be vacated on the basis that there was insufficient evidence to show that the statute of limitation was tolled with regard to those crimes after they had been committed in 1983. See OCGA § 17- 3-1 (c) (“Except as otherwise provided in Code Section 17-3-2.1[, which refers to felonies not at issue in this case,] prosecution for felonies other than [murder or other crimes punishable by death or life imprisonment] shall be commenced evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support...
Copy

Sims v. State, 862 S.E.2d 534 (Ga. 2021).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Aug 24, 2021 | 312 Ga. 322

...State, 351 Ga. App. 836, 838 (832 SE2d 437) (2019) 23 (holding that trial counsel had not performed deficiently by failing to file a plea in bar contending that the State had failed to allege in the indictment that OCGA § 17-3-2.1 (a) tolled the applicable statute of limitation where the record showed that the State had properly alleged the tolling provision and a plea in bar would have been meritless). Judgment affirmed....
Copy

Vasquez v. State, 306 Ga. 216 (Ga. 2019).

Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 24, 2019