O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 17-6-53 (2019)
Giving advice or directions to defendants who are principals in bonds regarding defense or disposition of cases
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Professional bondsmen, their agents, or employees shall not advise defendants who are principals in bonds signed by them or give any directions in the defense or disposition of the cases in which they sign bonds.
History
Ga. L. 1921, p. 243, § 4; Code 1933, § 27-505.
Annotations
JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in State v. Jackson, 188 Ga. App. 259, 372 S.E.2d 823 (1988). RESEARCH REFERENCES C.J.S. - 8 C.J.S., Bail; Release and Detention Pending Proceedings, §§ 2 et seq., 170.
ALR. - Validity, construction, and application of statutes regulating bail bond business, 13 A.L.R.3d 618.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1988–1988 · leading case: State v. Jackson, 372 S.E.2d 823 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988).
State v. Jackson, 372 S.E.2d 823 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988). “The appellee, a bail bondsman, was charged by accusation with (1) suggesting to an arrestee the employment of a particular attorney, in violation of OCGA § 17-6-51; (2) soliciting business at the jail, in violation of OCGA § 17-6-52; and (3) giving advice to an arrestee with…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.