Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448As used in this article, the term:
(Code 1933, § 34-1701, enacted by Ga. L. 1964, Ex. Sess., p. 26, § 1; Ga. L. 1987, p. 1050, § 1; Ga. L. 1998, p. 295, § 1.)
- In an election contest, the trial court did not err in denying an incumbent's motion to dismiss a challenger's lawsuit merely because that challenger failed to name the Board of Registration and Elections as the proper party defendant, as the failure to name the proper parties was an amendable defect, correctable by the parties or upon the court's own motion. Brodie v. Champion, 281 Ga. 105, 636 S.E.2d 511 (2006).
Cited in Ollila v. Graham, 126 Ga. App. 288, 190 S.E.2d 542 (1972).
Total Results: 11
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-12-10
Snippet: May 30, nine days after the primary. See OCGA § 21-2-520 et seq. That post-primary petition did not seek
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-09-17
Snippet: action is not an election contest under OCGA § 21-2-520 et seq. or a challenge to candidate qualifications
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-08-13
Snippet: litigate his election contest claims under OCGA § 21-2-520 et seq. before a subsequent election takes place
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2021-09-21
Snippet: 193, 194 (835 SE2d 245) (2019); see also OCGA § 21-2-520 et seq. “But an election contest is, by statutory
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2008-11-17
Citation: 670 S.E.2d 98, 284 Ga. 641, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 3671, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 978
Snippet: Yost, 281 Ga. 102, 636 S.E.2d 517 (2006); OCGA §§ 21-2-520 (allowing candidate to "contest the result of
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2006-10-16
Citation: 636 S.E.2d 517, 281 Ga. 102, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 3174, 2006 Ga. LEXIS 836
Snippet: involve an election contest brought under OCGA § 21-2-520 et seq., which by its terms, allows a candidate
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2006-10-16
Citation: 636 S.E.2d 511, 281 Ga. 105
Snippet: the proper party defendant pursuant to OCGA § 21-2-520(2).[2] Instead of specifically naming the Board
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1998-06-01
Citation: 501 S.E.2d 195, 269 Ga. 582, 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 1850, 1998 Ga. LEXIS 574
Snippet: Article 13 of the Georgia Election Code, OCGA §§ 21-2-520 et seq., sets forth the mechanisms for expediting
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1997-04-28
Citation: 485 S.E.2d 723, 267 Ga. 873, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 1433, 1997 Ga. LEXIS 154
Snippet: Article 13 of the Georgia Election Code, OCGA § 21-2-520 et seq., embodies the controlling statutes which
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1993-06-14
Citation: 263 Ga. 178, 432 S.E.2d 103, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 2202, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 488
Snippet: in an election contest are set forth in OCGA § 21-2-520: (2) “Defendant” means: (A) The person whose nomination
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1993-05-03
Citation: 428 S.E.2d 570, 263 Ga. 111, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 1766, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 400, 1993 WL 139338
Snippet: Bailey filed a contest to the election (see OCGA § 21-2-520 et seq.), contending there were irregularities