O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 26-2-212 (2019)

County and municipal ordinances dealing with meats, poultry, and dairy products

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Nothing in this article shall prevent the governing authority of any county or municipal corporation from adopting ordinances or resolutions providing for the inspection of meats, poultry, meat or poultry food products, and dairy products sold within its limits and to provide penalties for violation thereof; but no such ordinance or resolution shall conflict with any power or authority of the Commissioner or his representatives; provided, however, that no county or municipal corporation shall adopt sanitary standards or specifications that are less than those adopted by the Commissioner.

History

Ga. L. 1914, p. 148, § 5; Code 1933, § 42-406; Ga. L. 1956, p. 748, § 10.

Annotations

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Violation of section might not be punishable as misdemeanor. - Whether a violation of the provisions of former Code 1933, § 42-406 (see now O.C.G.A. § 26-2-212) could be punished

as for a misdemeanor as provided for in former Code 1933, § 42-9908 (see now O.C.G.A. § 26-2-215) was questionable. 1960-61 Ga. Op. Att’y Gen. 396.

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. Constitutionality of regulations as to milk, 42 A.L.R. 556; 58 A.L.R. 672; 80

A.L.R. 1225; 101 A.L.R. 64; 110 A.L.R. 644; 119 A.L.R. 243; 155 A.L.R. 1383. Validity of municipal ordinance impos-

ing requirements on outside producers of milk to be sold in city, 14 A.L.R.2d 103.

Dairy, creamery, or milk distributing plant, as nuisance, 92 A.L.R.2d 974.