O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 26-3-1 (2019)

Short title

✓ O.C.G.A.: 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter may be cited as the “Georgia Drug and Cosmetic Act.”

History

Ga. L. 1961, p. 529, § 1; Code 1933,

§ 79A-1001, enacted by Ga. L. 1967, p. 296, § 1.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Georgia Drug and Cosmetic Act is not unconstitutional as violating the provisions of Ga. Const. 1945, Art. III, Sec. VII, Para. VIII (see now Ga. Const. 1983, Art. III, Sec. V, Para. III) which prohibits the inclusion of more than one subject

matter in any act of the General Assembly. Crumley v. Head, 225 Ga. 246, 167 S.E.2d 651, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 451 (1969) (decided under former Ga. Const. 1945, Art. III, Sec. VII, Para. VIII).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1987–1987 · leading case: Foster v. Georgia Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners, 359 S.E.2d 877 (Ga. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Foster v. Georgia Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners, 359 S.E.2d 877 (Ga. 1987). · cites it 2× “Appellant’s remaining Non-Constitutional arguments (11) The appellant argues that vitamins, minerals, and food supplements should not be treated as drugs under the Georgia CPA, since such substances are treated as foods under the Georgia Drug and Cosmetics Act (GDCA), OCGA §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.