Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 3-4-44 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 3 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES

Section 4. Distilled Spirits, 3-4-1 through 3-4-180.

ARTICLE 3 LOCAL AUTHORIZATION AND REGULATIONS FOR MANUFACTURE, DISTRIBUTION, AND PACKAGE SALES

3-4-44. Certification of results; payment of expenses.

It shall be the duty of the election superintendent of the county or the municipality, as the case may be, to canvass the returns and declare and certify the results of the election to the Secretary of State. The expense for the election shall be borne by the county or the municipality conducting the election.

(Ga. L. 1937-38, Ex. Sess., p. 103, § 4; Ga. L. 1972, p. 207, § 3; Code 1933, § 5A-2305, enacted by Ga. L. 1980, p. 1573, § 1; Ga. L. 1983, p. 806, § 2; Ga. L. 2017, p. 820, § 2/HB 485.)

Editor's notes.

- Ga. L. 2017, p. 820, § 1/HB 485, effective May 9, 2017, reenacted this Code section without change.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

This section requires only that the ordinary (election superintendent) shall receive returns of election held and ascertain and immediately declare result thereof. No method or manner by which the ordinary may determine and announce result of election is provided; and there is no provision in the statutes for a contest or other hearing before the ordinary. It is clear that the acts of the ordinary were not judicial, but were ministerial or administrative, and that they are not reviewable by certiorari. Brockett v. Maxwell, 73 Ga. App. 663, 38 S.E.2d 176 (1946).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 45 Am. Jur. 2d, Intoxicating Liquors, § 92.

C.J.S.

- 48 C.J.S., Intoxicating Liquors, §§ 81, 84.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 3-4-44 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 5

In re Meyer

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2003-10-06

Citation: 277 Ga. 192, 587 S.E.2d 60, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 2979, 2003 Ga. LEXIS 845

Snippet: of Bar Rule 4-102 (d). A violation of Standard 3, 4, 44, 61, 63, 65, or 66 is punishable by disbarment

In re Bell

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2000-11-30

Citation: 273 Ga. 196, 539 S.E.2d 806, 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 4270, 2000 Ga. LEXIS 881

Snippet: as a result of Bell’s violations of Standards 3, 4, 44, 45, 61, 63 and 65 of Bar Rule 4-102 (d). Accordingly

In Matter of Robert A. Meier

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1986-05-30

Citation: 344 S.E.2d 212, 256 Ga. 72, 1986 Ga. LEXIS 688

Snippet: charges that Meier violated Rule 4-102, Standards 3, 4, 44, 63 and 65. After an evidentiary hearing at which

Watson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1941-09-10

Citation: 16 S.E.2d 426, 192 Ga. 679, 1941 Ga. LEXIS 542

Snippet: 26-6401, 26-6402;Rivers v. State, 118 Ga. 42 (3, 4) (44 S.E. 859);Birdsong v. State, 120 Ga. 850 (3) (48

Smith & Bondurant v. Meador

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1885-04-02

Citation: 74 Ga. 416, 1885 Ga. LEXIS 329

Snippet: (2); 14 Id., 192 (2); 20 Id., pp. 748, 749, (3), (4); 44 Id., 454; 52 Id., 239 (6); 63 Id., 527, where