O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 35-3-2 (2019)

Creation

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

There is created a Georgia Bureau of Investigation which shall be a separate department and agency of state government.

History

Ga. L. 1937, p. 322, art. 3, § 1; Ga. L. 1972, p. 1015, §§ 1608, 1608.1; Ga. L. 1974, p. 109, § 2.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in State v. Holton, 173 Ga. App. 241, 326 S.E.2d 235 (1984). RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 16A Am. Jur. 2d, Constitutional Law, §§ 347 et seq., 393.

C.J.S. - 16A C.J.S., Constitutional Law, §§ 707, 708, 709.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1984–2007 · leading case: Grech v. Clayton Cnty., GA, 335 F.3d 1326 (11th Cir. 2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Grech v. Clayton Cnty., GA, 335 F.3d 1326 (11th Cir. 2003). “O.C.G.A. §§ 35-3-2; 35 — 3—31(a). Responsibility for the GCIC is vested with the “Director” of the center, with the guidance of the GCIC Council.”

Corner v. State, 477 S.E.2d 593 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “1 The State does not dispute that the GBI is an agency, OCGA § 35-3-2, and the DFS is a division of that agency, OCGA § 35-3-3, as defined in the APA, and is thus mandated to adhere to requirements of the Act in amending its rules and regulations.”

State v. Holton, 326 S.E.2d 235 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “” The State contends that if the legislature had intended for the DFS to comply with the APA, the statute would have specifically directed DFS to do so. We find this analysis unpersuasive.”

Tubbs v. State, 642 S.E.2d 205 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 35-3-2; State v. Holton, 173 Ga. App.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.