Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448As used in this chapter, the term:
(4.1) "Detention facility" means a municipal or county jail used for the detention of persons charged with or convicted of a felony, a misdemeanor, or a municipal or county ordinance, but shall not include a facility customarily used to hold one or more persons for a period not to exceed eight hours while any such person awaits processing, booking, court appearance, or release.
(5.1) "Jail officer" means any person who is employed or appointed by a county or a municipality and who has the responsibility of supervising inmates who are confined in a municipal or county detention facility.
(5.2) "Juvenile correctional facility" means a facility operated by the Department of Juvenile Justice and used for the detention of youth who are delinquent or who are alleged to be delinquent or a facility operated by the Department of Juvenile Justice used for the care, treatment, and rehabilitation of juvenile offenders.
(5.3) "Juvenile correctional officer" means any person employed or appointed by the Department of Juvenile Justice who has the primary responsibility for the supervision and control of youth confined in its programs and facilities.
(B.1) Personnel who are authorized to exercise the power of arrest, who are employed or appointed by the Department of Juvenile Justice, and whose full-time duties include the preservation of public order, the protection of life and property, the detection of crime, the supervision of delinquent children in the department's institutions, facilities, or programs, or the supervision of delinquent children under intensive supervision in the community;
Law enforcement support personnel are not peace officers within the meaning of this chapter, but they may be certified upon voluntarily complying with the certification provisions of this chapter.
(10.1) "School resource officer" means a peace officer whose primary employment or assigned duties with a law enforcement unit is assignment or appointment to a public elementary school or secondary school.
(Ga. L. 1970, p. 208, §§ 2, 14; Ga. L. 1975, p. 1165, §§ 2, 3, 10; Ga. L. 1976, p. 395, §§ 1-5; Ga. L. 1978, p. 992, §§ 1, 2; Ga. L. 1978, p. 2299, § 1; Ga. L. 1980, p. 979, § 1; Ga. L. 1981, p. 778, § 1; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 35; Ga. L. 1982, p. 2478, §§ 1, 2, 5, 6; Ga. L. 1985, p. 283, § 1; Ga. L. 1987, p. 1141, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 568, § 1; Ga. L. 1993, p. 91, § 35; Ga. L. 1993, p. 966, §§ 1, 2; Ga. L. 1995, p. 880, § 1; Ga. L. 1995, p. 1238, § 1; Ga. L. 1996, p. 1281, § 1; Ga. L. 1997, p. 582, §§ 1, 2; Ga. L. 1997, p. 1453, § 1; Ga. L. 1997, p. 1488, §§ 2A, 2B, 7A, 7B; Ga. L. 1998, p. 128, § 35; Ga. L. 1998, p. 224, § 2; Ga. L. 1999, p. 777, §§ 2, 3; Ga. L. 2012, p. 775, § 35/HB 942; Ga. L. 2013, p. 294, § 4-45/HB 242; Ga. L. 2014, p. 382, § 1/SB 324; Ga. L. 2015, p. 422, § 5-56/HB 310; Ga. L. 2017, p. 673, § 1-1/SB 149.)
The 2012 amendment, effective May 1, 2012, part of an Act to revise, modernize, and correct the Code, revised punctuation in paragraph (4).
The 2013 amendment, effective January 1, 2014, in subparagraphs (7)(B) and (8)(B), substituted "delinquent children and any child with a pending juvenile court case alleging the child to be a child in need of services" for "unruly and delinquent children"; substituted "such department" for "said department" near the middle of subparagraph (7)(B); and deleted "and unruly" following "delinquent" near the end of subparagraph (8)(B.1). See Editor's notes for applicability.
The 2014 amendment, effective July 1, 2014, deleted "or" following "of crime," and "added , or the supervision of delinquent children under intensive supervision in the community" to the end of subparagraph (8)(B.1).
The 2015 amendment, effective July 1, 2015, inserted "the Department of Community Supervision," near the beginning of subparagraphs (7)(C) and (8)(C), and substituted "such department" for "said department" near the end of subparagraph (7)(C). See Editor's notes for applicability.
The 2017 amendment, effective July 1, 2017, added paragraph (10.1).
- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1998, "Department of Juvenile Justice" was substituted for "Department of Children and Youth Services" in subparagraph (8)(B).
- Ga. L. 2013, p. 294, § 5-1/HB 242, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "This Act shall become effective on January 1, 2014, and shall apply to all offenses which occur and juvenile proceedings commenced on and after such date. Any offense occurring before January 1, 2014, shall be governed by the statute in effect at the time of such offense and shall be considered a prior adjudication for the purpose of imposing a disposition that provides for a different penalty for subsequent adjudications, of whatever class, pursuant to this Act. The enactment of this Act shall not affect any prosecutions for acts occurring before January 1, 2014, and shall not act as an abatement of any such prosecutions."
Ga. L. 2015, p. 422, § 6-1/HB 310, not codified by the General Assembly, provides, in part, that this Act shall apply to sentences entered on or after July 1, 2015.
- Training, Official Compilation of the Rules and Regulations of the Sate of Georgia, Personnel, Board of Corrections, Sec. 124-2-1-.06.
Definition, Official Compilation of the Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia, Georgia Peace Officer Standards and Training Council, Sec. 464-2-.01.
- For article on the 2015 amendment of this Code section, see 32 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 231 (2015). For review of 1996 use of radar speed detection devices legislation, see 13 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 244 (1996).
- Under the police power, a deputy sheriff is authorized to go upon private property and direct the owner to move back from a burning building, when the deputy has been made aware of the possibility of an explosion, and in the deputy's opinion the safety of a 21/2-year-old child was unnecessarily endangered because of the proximity to the burning structure. Veit v. State, 182 Ga. App. 753, 357 S.E.2d 113 (1987).
- Juvenile's interference with a juvenile probation officer's attempt to take the juvenile into custody, after the juvenile tested positive for illegal drug use, was sufficient to support an adjudication under O.C.G.A. § 16-10-24(b); moreover, the appeals court was not persuaded by the juvenile's contention that O.C.G.A. § 42-8-30 specifically limited the role of the "probation supervisor" over juveniles to those counties in which no juvenile probation system existed. In the Interest of M.M., 287 Ga. App. 233, 651 S.E.2d 155 (2007), cert. denied, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 95 (Ga. 2008).
- Trial court erred by entering a default judgment against a police officer for failing to timely answer because the officer was immune from suit on the claim brought under state law, thus, the default judgment entered on that claim was a nullity and the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and should have dismissed the state law cause of action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Ferrell v. Young, 323 Ga. App. 338, 746 S.E.2d 167 (2013).
- With respect to law enforcement officers claiming qualified immunity in a case alleging that certain searches violated Fourth Amendment rights, the officers could show that the officers were acting within the officers' discretionary authority because it is clear that performing searches and assisting in arrests are legitimate job-related functions within the power of law enforcement bodies under O.C.G.A. § 35-8-2(8)(A). Mehta v. Foskey, 877 F. Supp. 2d 1367 (S.D. Ga. 2012).
Cited in Talley v. State, 129 Ga. App. 479, 199 S.E.2d 908 (1973); Smith v. Price, 616 F.2d 1371 (5th Cir. 1980); State v. Lockett, 259 Ga. App. 179, 576 S.E.2d 582 (2003); Manders v. Lee, 338 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2003); Love v. State, 290 Ga. App. 486, 659 S.E.2d 835 (2008).
- Employee of agency who is required by oath of office to preserve public order and protect life and property, but does not have power to make arrests, is not a peace officer under this definition. 1981 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 81-31.
- There are two conditions provided for in the definition of a peace officer, but it must be understood that once a person is given the power to arrest it necessarily follows that the person has a duty to preserve the public order. 1981 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 81-31.
- District attorney does not fit under any definition of a law enforcement officer or peace officer in this state. 1980 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U80-33.
- Though the security officers of the North Georgia Mountains Authority do have the power of arrest, the security officers fail to meet the definition of "peace officer" on two other grounds: (1) the security officers are not responsible for the enforcement of the criminal laws of the state or its political subdivisions; and (2) the security guards are not employed by the Department of Public Safety, a municipality, or a county. 1972 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 72-27.
Sheriffs and deputy sheriffs of municipal courts are not "peace officers" as defined by this section since they are not employed by a law enforcement unit. 1975 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U75-7 (see O.C.G.A. § 35-8-2).
- Communications department, independent from the law enforcement agencies the department serves, which is primarily an information transmitting department, is not a "law enforcement unit" as defined in paragraph (7) of O.C.G.A. § 35-8-2. 1983 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 83-67.
Intent of General Assembly regarding certification of persons employed to use speed detection devices was to have people certified no matter which type of device is used as long as the device itself fits within the definition provided for under paragraph (11) of this section. 1981 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 81-77 (see O.C.G.A. § 35-8-2).
Paragraph (11) does not include devices not considered under § 40-14-1. - Paragraph (11) of Ga. L. 1970, p. 208, §§ 2 and 14 (see O.C.G.A. § 35-8-2) specifically defines certain devices and does not bring in any additional types of devices not considered under the definition found in Ga. L. 1970, p. 435, § 3 (see O.C.G.A. § 40-14-1). 1981 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 81-77.
Definition of "speed detection device" in Ga. L. 1970, p. 208, §§ 2 and 14 (see O.C.G.A. § 35-8-2) does not conflict with the definition for the same device in Ga. L. 1970, p. 435, § 3 (see O.C.G.A. § 40-14-1). 1981 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 81-77.
- Although not normally thought to be a "speed detection device," a stopwatch meets this definition when the stopwatch is being used in traffic enforcement. 1981 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 81-77.
Stopwatch is a mechanism similar to "Vascar." In actuality "Vascar" is a type of stopwatch combined with a computer which handles the mathematical functions. 1981 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 81-77.
- 8 Am. Jur. 2d, Automobiles and Highway Traffic, §§ 980, 981.
- 22A C.J.S., Criminal Law, § 902. 62 C.J.S., Municipal Corporations, § 573 et seq.
No results found for Georgia Code 35-8-2.