O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 36-62-11 (2019)

Construction of chapter generally; effect of conflict

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

between chapter and other provisions of law; applicability of certain other provisions of law to proceedings under chapter. This chapter shall be liberally construed to effect the purposes hereof, and insofar as this chapter may be inconsistent with the provisions of any other law, including the charter of any municipal corporation, this chapter shall be controlling. The sale or issuance of bonds by any authority shall not be subject to regulation under Chapter 5 of Title 10, the ‘‘Georgia Uniform Securities Act of 2008,’’ or any other law. No proceeding or publication not required in this chapter shall be necessary to the performance of any act authorized in this chapter, nor shall any such act be subject to referendum.

History

Ga. L. 1963, p. 531, § 11; Ga. L. 1969, p. 137, § 8; Ga. L. 2008, p. 381, § 11/SB 358.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS O.C.G.A. Ch. 62, T. 36 is to be liberally construed; liberally, but not ultraliberally. Day v. Development Auth., 248 Ga. 488, 284 S.E.2d 275 (1981). Section preempted by the War on Terrorism Local Assistance Act, O.C.G.A. § 36-75-11(c). - Superior court did not err in finding that a county development authority was within the category of authorities governed by the War on

Terrorism Local Assistance Act, O.C.G.A. § 36-75-11(c), because § 36-75-11(c) was a general law that preempted by implication the exemption from referenda set forth in the Development Authorities Law, O.C.G.A. § 36-62-11, as to those development authorities that met the criteria of authorities defined in § 36-75-11(c). Dev. Auth. v. State, 286 Ga. 36, 684 S.E.2d 856 (2009).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: Dev. Auth. of DeKalb Cnty. v. State, 684 S.E.2d 856 (Ga. 2009).
Dev. Auth. of DeKalb Cnty. v. State, 684 S.E.2d 856 (Ga. 2009). · cites it 8× “OCGA § 36-62-11. This provision was not affected by the initial enactment of the WTLA Act, see Ga.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.