O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 36-81-9 (2019)
Effect of article on other laws generally
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This article shall not be construed to repeal or conflict with any law providing budgetary, fiscal, or auditing procedures more restrictive than those in this article.
History
Ga. L. 1980, p. 1738, § 10; Ga. L. 1987, p. 3, § 36.
Annotations
JUDICIAL DECISIONS O.C.G.A. Art. 1, Ch. 81, T. 36 did not repeal by implication a 1961 local law requiring a county board of commissioners to publish ‘‘a monthly report or statement
in detail of the expenses and disbursements of the funds’’ of the county and to publish a full statement of the amount of money that was owed by the county and to
whom. Eley v. Greene County Bd. of Comm’rs, 258 Ga. 562, 372 S.E.2d 231 (1988).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1988–1988 · leading case: Eley v. Greene Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 372 S.E.2d 231 (Ga. 1988).
Eley v. Greene Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 372 S.E.2d 231 (Ga. 1988). “On the contrary, section 36-81-9 specifically states that "This article shall not be construed to repeal or conflict with any law providing budgetary, fiscal, or auditing procedures more restrictive than those in this article.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.