Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1953, Nov.-Dec. Sess., p. 556, § 78; Code 1933, § 68A-502, enacted by Ga. L. 1974, p. 633, § 1; Ga. L. 1990, p. 2048, § 5; Ga. L. 1995, p. 229, § 3.)
Pedestrian in crosswalk is entitled to assume that approaching vehicle would yield right of way and not pass the other stopped vehicles. Greene v. Helms, 115 Ga. App. 447, 154 S.E.2d 892 (1967).
When the pedestrian plaintiff entered the roadway in the crosswalk and in accordance with the pedestrian-control signal, it was error to charge the jury on the "dart-out" provision of O.C.G.A. § 40-6-91. Gaffron v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth., 229 Ga. App. 426, 494 S.E.2d 54 (1997).
When the plaintiff represented that the plaintiff safely entered a crosswalk, although admitting that the last time the plaintiff saw the defendant's vehicle was when the vehicle was slowing down, and that plaintiff entered the crosswalk when faced solely with a green arrow, and when the defendant's testimony was that the plaintiff "jetted out" into the path of the defendant's vehicle as the defendant made a right turn on red, the jury's verdict in favor of the defendant was authorized by the evidence and the trial court did not err in denying the plaintiff's motion for new trial. Sampson v. Jones, 236 Ga. App. 57, 510 S.E.2d 902 (1999).
- Grant of summary judgment to the driver and the insurer was affirmed because the evidence showed that the plaintiff was dressed in black clothing, was drunk, crossed a major roadway at night outside of an available crosswalk, and there was no evidence that the driver was speeding nor was violating any rules of the road, or even saw the pedestrian; therefore, the driver did not fail to exercise due diligence to avoid striking the pedestrian. Politzer v. Xiaoyan, 801 S.E.2d 114 (2017).
- Appellate court erred in reversing the defendant's conviction for vehicular homicide based on the defendant's failure to stop for a pedestrian in a crosswalk because those charges were strict liability offenses to which the accident defense did not apply since it was undisputed the defendant voluntarily drove into the crosswalk and struck the child. State v. Ogilvie, 292 Ga. 6, 734 S.E.2d 50 (2012).
Cited in Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth. v. Federick, 187 Ga. App. 696, 371 S.E.2d 204 (1988); Weathers v. Foote & Davies Transp. Co., 189 Ga. App. 134, 375 S.E.2d 97 (1988).
- 7A Am. Jur. 2d, Automobiles and Highway Traffic, § 302.
- 60A C.J.S., Motor Vehicles, § 895.
- Duty of pedestrian before crossing street to look for vehicles approaching on intersecting street, 9 A.L.R. 1248; 44 A.L.R. 1299.
Liability for injury to pedestrian colliding with side of automobile, 25 A.L.R. 1513.
Contributory negligence of pedestrian at street crossing as affected by statute or ordinance, 96 A.L.R. 786.
Liability for collision of automobile with pedestrian at intersection as affected by reliance upon or disregard of traffic sign or signal other than stop-and-go signal, 3 A.L.R.3d 557.
No results found for Georgia Code 40-6-91.