O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 44-2-15 (2019)

Officers authorized to attest registrable instruments

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any of the instruments enumerated in Code Section 44-2-14 may be attested by a judge of a court of record, including a judge of a municipal court, or by a magistrate, a notary public, or a clerk or deputy clerk of a superior court or of a city court created by special Act of the General Assembly. With the exception of notaries public and judges of courts of record, such officers may attest such instruments only in the county in which they respectively hold their offices. (Laws 1785, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, p. 164; Laws 1827, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, pp. 171, 172; Laws 1839, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, p. 177; Laws 1850, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, pp. 180, 181; Ga. L. 1849-50, p. 149, § 1; Ga. L. 1853-54, p. 26, § 1; Code 1863, § 2668; Code 1868, § 2664; Code 1873, § 2706; Code 1882, § 2706; Ga. L. 1893, p. 37, § 1; Civil Code 1895, § 3620; Civil Code 1910, § 4202; Ga. L. 1924, p. 83, § 1;

Ga. L. 1931, p. 153, § 1; Code 1933, § 29-406; Ga. L. 1951, p. 15, § 1; Ga. L. 1983, p. 884, § 4-1.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS can Slicing Mach. Co., 18 Ga. App. 670, 90 S.E. 366 (1916) (see O.C.G.A. § 44-2-15). Clerk of superior court can attest deed in the county wherein the clerk holds office, and not elsewhere, and the clerk cannot only witness a deed when the deed is to be recorded in that county. Anderson & Conley v. Leverette, 116 Ga. 732, 42 S.E. 1026 (1902). Attesting officer presumed to have jurisdiction. - In the absence of direct evidence to the contrary, a deed is presumed to have been executed where attested, and the attesting officer is presumed to have had jurisdiction. Rowe v. Spencer, 132 Ga. 426, 64 S.E. 468, 47 L.R.A. (n.s.) 561 (1909); Flint River Lumber Co. v. Smith, 134 Ga. 627, 68 S.E. 436 (1910). See also Glover v. Cox, 137 Ga. 684, 73 S.E. 1068, 1913B Ann. Cas. 191 (1912); Cammon v. State, 20 Ga. App. 175, 92 S.E. 957 (1917). Lack of attestation or acknowledgment as affecting notice. - Registry of deed not attested, or not legally proved or acknowledged, is not constructive notice to a subsequent purchaser. Citizens’ Bank v. Taylor, 169 Ga. 203, 149 S.E. 861 (1929). Alleged defect in notarization not apparent on face of document. - Trial court did not err in granting summary judgment to the corporations on the issue of whether the corporations had actual or constructive notice of fraud regarding the relatives’ quitclaim deeds despite the relatives’ assertions that the deeds were notarized after the deeds were signed and were notarized outside the presence of each of the relatives; even assuming the assertion was true, that defect in proper notarization was not apparent from the face of any of the deeds involved, all of which were signed, witnessed, and notarized. Bowman v. Century Funding, Ltd., 277 Ga. App. 540, 627 S.E.2d 73 (2006).

Recorded deed must be attested, acknowledged, or proven by affidavit. - To admit a deed to record, it must be a perfect deed. It must be attested by two witnesses. It must be attested or acknowledged, if executed in this state, as provided in former Civil Code 1910, § 4202 (see O.C.G.A. § 44-2-15), or it must be probated as provided in former Civil Code 1910, § 4205 (see O.C.G.A. § 44-2-18). Citizens’ Bank v. Taylor, 169 Ga. 203, 149 S.E. 861 (1929). Deeds of realty and personalty may be acknowledged before, as well as attested by, an officer, or proven by the affidavit of a subscribing witness to prepare the deeds for record. Webb v. United-American Soda Fountain Co., 59 F.2d 329 (5th Cir. 1932). Effect of statutory modification. - Codifiers intentionally modified preexisting law which allowed clerk of inferior court to make attestation required. Miller v. Southwestern R.R., 55 Ga. 143 (1875); Kennedy v. McCardel, 88 Ga. 454, 14 S.E. 710 (1892) (decided under former Code 1873, § 2706, prior to amendment by Ga. L. 1924, p. 83, § 1). For other modifications made by the codifiers, see Gress Lumber Co. v. Coody, 99 Ga. 775, 27 S.E. 169 (1896); Anderson & Conley v. Leverette, 116 Ga. 732, 42 S.E. 1026 (1902). Attestation by justice of peace of another state does not meet requirements of this statute. Eaton v. Freeman, 58 Ga. 129 (1877) (see O.C.G.A. § 44-2-15). Attestation by notary public of another county. - Attestation by a notary public of another county than that in which recordation is sought does not meet requirements of this statute. Allgood v. State, 87 Ga. 668, 13 S.E. 569 (1891). See also Brockett v. Ameri-

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 23 Am. Jur. 2d, Deeds, § 99.

C.J.S. - 26A C.J.S., Deeds, §§ 68, 69.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26 cases (12 in the last 5 years), 2006–2026 · leading case: Trauner v. First Tennessee Bank Nat'l Ass'n (In re Simpson), 544 B.R. 913 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2016).
Trauner v. First Tennessee Bank Nat'l Ass'n (In re Simpson), 544 B.R. 913 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2016). · cites it 6× “§ 44-2-18 is a remedial provision that states: If a deed is neither attested by nor acknowledged before one of the officers named in Code Section 44-2-15, it may be recorded upon the affidavit of a subscribing witness, which affidavit shall be made before any one of the officers…”
Gordon v. Taylor (In Re Taylor), 430 B.R. 305 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2010). · cites it 4× “The complaint alleged that the security deed failed to comply with the Georgia law requirement that Deutsche’s security deed be attested to by an official witness.”
Gordon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In re Knight), 504 B.R. 668 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2014). · cites it 6× “In order for a security deed to be “duly recorded”, it must be attested or acknowledged by an “official witness” such as a judge of a court of record, a notary public, or a clerk or deputy clerk of a superior court or a city court, and it must also be attested or acknowledged by…”
Kelley v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In re Perry), 565 B.R. 442 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2017). · cites it 6× “In other words, an affidavit of a subscribing official witness must meet the following two-prong test to cure a defective security deed: (1) it must be made before a notary public or another officer as listed in O.C.G.A. § 44-2-15; and (2) it must testify to the execution and…”
U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Gordon, 709 S.E.2d 258 (Ga. 2011). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 44-2-15 (listing the “officers” who are authorized to attest a mortgage or deed).”
Joan Haynes v. McCalla Raymer, LLC, 793 F.3d 1246 (11th Cir. 2015). “See O.C.G.A. §§ 44-2-15, 44-14-33; see also Hopkins v.”
Bagwell v. Trammel, 778 S.E.2d 173 (Ga. 2015). · cites it 4× “Pursuant to OCGA § 44-5-30, a “deed to lands shall be an original document, in writing, signed by the maker, attested by an officer as provided in Code Section 44-2-15, and attested by one other witness.”
Gordon v. OneWest Bank FSB (In re Blackmon), 509 B.R. 415 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2014). · cites it 4× “See O.C.G.A. §§ 44-2-15 and 44-14-38. “Attestation is the act of witnessing the actual execution of a paper, and subscribing one’s name as a witness to that fact.”
Pingora Loan Servicing, LLC v. Cathy L. Scarver, 30 F.4th 1086 (11th Cir. 2022). “O.C.G.A. §§ 44-2-15, 44-14-61. The attorney was a notary, but he failed to attest the deed.”
Z & Y Corp. v. Indore C. Stores, Inc., 638 S.E.2d 760 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “Taylor, 169 Ga. 203, 210 ( 149 SE 861 ) (1929). Further, under OCGA § 44-2-14 (a), a deed may be recorded only if it has been properly attested or acknowledged.”
Gordon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Codrington), 430 B.R. 287 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2009). “As discussed previously, §§ 44-14-61 and 44-14-33, two witnesses must attest or acknowledge the execution of a security deed in order to admit the deed to record, and one of those witnesses must be an officer authorized pursuant to § 44-2-15 to attest recordable instruments.”
Us Bank Nat. Ass'n v. Gordon, 709 S.E.2d 258 (Ga. 2011). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 44-2-15 (listing the "officers" who are authorized to attest a mortgage or deed).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.