O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 44-5-13 (2019)

Grants by implication; presumptions favor grants

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A grantee of lands or a franchise takes nothing by implication but is confined to the terms of his grant; but every presumption is in favor of a grant.

History

(Orig. Code 1863, § 2334; Code 1868, § 2331; Code 1873, § 2362; Code 1882, § 2362; Civil Code 1895, § 3221; Civil Code 1910, § 3809; Code 1933, § 85-312.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Grant to maintain turnpike road strictly construed in favor of public. - Grant to a company incorporating them to construct and maintain a turnpike road, whether it be of property or franchises, is to be construed strictly in favor of the public, and nothing passes but what is granted in clear and explicit terms. Vernon Shell Rd. Co. v. Mayor of Savannah, 95 Ga. 387, 22 S.E. 625 (1895).

Authority to extend railroad into city not found. - An Act authorizing a railroad ‘‘to extend their road from any point at or in the City of Savannah to the island of Tybee’’ does not authorize the railroad to extend their road into the city, in a direction differing from that to Tybee Island, and to lay their track through the entire length of one of the streets, with a grade requiring deep

excavations and high embankments. Savannah, A. & G.R.R. v. Shields, 33 Ga. 601 (1863). RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 63A Am. Jur. 2d, Public Lands, §§ 3 et seq., 124. C.J.S. - 73B C.J.S., Public Lands, § 278. ALR. - Reservation in grant of land of right to hunt and fish with like right to the grantee, as limiting the right of the grantee actual owners of the land, 32 ALR 1533. Release of power of appointment of property, 76 ALR 1430.

Width of way created by express grant, reservation, or exception not specifying width, 28 ALR2d 253. Validity and effect of provision in deed attempting to make reservation or exception in favor of grantor’s spouse, 52 ALR3d 753. Liability for interference with franchise, 97 ALR3d 890.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: The State of Georgia v. Nofree, LLC (Ga. Ct. App. 2024).
The State of Georgia v. Nofree, LLC (Ga. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 8× “”8 Second, under OCGA § 44-5-13, “[a] grantee of lands [from the State] takes nothing by implication [and] is confined to the terms of his grant; but every presumption is in favor of a grant.”
The State of Georgia v. Nofree, LLC (Ga. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 4× “The court noted that it was cognizant that this matter involves complex factual issues which necessitate the harmonious application of various bodies of law including OCGA § 44-5-13 and § 44-5-14, which allow for a presumption of a 7 The trial court initially indicated that it…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.