O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 45-1-1 (2019)

Employees of state hospitals and certain state institutions authorized to make purchases of goods and services; limitations

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as provided in Code Sections 45-10-20 through 45-10-25, employees of hospitals, educational institutions, eleemosynary institutions, penal institutions, and correctional institutions which are under the control and jurisdiction of a state department or the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia shall be entitled to obtain goods and services in the same manner and under the same procedure used in obtaining such goods and services through such hospitals and institutions and the laws of this state relating to purchasing contrary thereto shall not apply to such employees; provided, however, that no employee shall be permitted to make any single purchase of goods or services in excess of $50.00, except medical and dental services only; and in no event shall any employee obtain goods or services for any person except for himself or members of his immediate family.

History

(Ga. L. 1956, p. 383, § 1; Ga. L. 1990, p. 8, § 45.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2021–2021 · leading case: Anton I. Baptiste v. Dekalb Cnty. Sheriff, Jeffrey L. Mann, in His Off. Capacity (Ga. Ct. App. 2021).
Anton I. Baptiste v. Dekalb Cnty. Sheriff, Jeffrey L. Mann, in His Off. Capacity (Ga. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “The Georgia Whistleblower Act, OCGA § 45-1-1 et seq., prohibits a public employer from retaliating “against a public employee for disclosing a violation of or noncompliance with a law, rule, or regulation to either a supervisor or a government agency, unless the disclosure was…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.