O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 46-3-295 (2019)

Removal of directors

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Unless otherwise provided in the bylaws, at any meeting of members with respect to which notice of such purpose has been given, the entire board of directors or any individual director may be removed, with or without cause, by the affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the electric membership corporation.

(b) Whenever the members from a particular district are entitled to elect one or more directors pursuant to subsection (e) of Code Section 46-3-293, this Code section shall apply, in respect of the removal of the director or directors so elected, to the vote of the members from that district and not to the vote of the members as a whole.

(c) If any or all directors are removed, new directors may be elected at the same meeting.

History

(Code 1933, § 34C-606, enacted by Ga. L. 1981, p. 1587, § 1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1990–1996 · leading case: Jordan v. Georgia Power Co., 466 S.E.2d 601 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jordan v. Georgia Power Co., 466 S.E.2d 601 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “Members of the corporation have the right to vote (OCGA § 46-3-266), to bring derivative actions (OCGA § 46-3-272), and to remove directors and certain officers and agents (OCGA §§ 46-3-295 and 46-3-302 (b), respectively).”
Lowman v. State, 398 S.E.2d 832 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “Members of the corporation have the right to vote (OCGA § 46-3-266), to bring derivative actions (OCGA § 46-3-272), and to remove directors and certain officers and agents (OCGA §§ 46-3-295 and 46-3-302 (b), respectively).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.